1
Fork 0

Replace Vec<Vec<_>> with Vec<_>

This commit is contained in:
Aaron Hill 2019-06-23 20:22:02 -04:00
parent e3d8001f00
commit 770655a47f
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B4087E510E98B164
2 changed files with 9 additions and 20 deletions

View file

@ -376,15 +376,7 @@ struct RegionResolutionVisitor<'tcx> {
// up their indices.
pessimistic_yield: bool,
// Stores scopes when pessimistic_yield is true.
// Each time we encounter an ExprKind::AssignOp, we push
// a new Vec into the outermost Vec. This inner Vec is used
// to store any scopes we encounter when visiting the inner expressions
// of the AssignOp. Once we finish visiting the inner expressions, we pop
// off the inner Vec, and process the Scopes it contains.
// This allows us to handle nested AssignOps - while a terrible idea,
// they are valid Rust, so we need to handle them.
fixup_scopes: Vec<Vec<Scope>>,
fixup_scopes: Vec<Scope>,
// Generated scope tree:
scope_tree: ScopeTree,
@ -1020,11 +1012,11 @@ fn resolve_expr<'tcx>(visitor: &mut RegionResolutionVisitor<'tcx>, expr: &'tcx h
let body = visitor.tcx.hir().body(body);
visitor.visit_body(body);
},
hir::ExprKind::AssignOp(_, ref left_expression, ref right_expression) => {
hir::ExprKind::AssignOp(_, ref left_expr, ref right_expr) => {
debug!("resolve_expr - enabling pessimistic_yield, was previously {}",
prev_pessimistic);
visitor.fixup_scopes.push(vec![]);
let start_point = visitor.fixup_scopes.len();
visitor.pessimistic_yield = true;
// If the actual execution order turns out to be right-to-left,
@ -1032,17 +1024,16 @@ fn resolve_expr<'tcx>(visitor: &mut RegionResolutionVisitor<'tcx>, expr: &'tcx h
// then we'll assign too low a count to any `yield` expressions
// we encounter in 'right_expression' - they should really occur after all of the
// expressions in 'left_expression'.
visitor.visit_expr(&right_expression);
visitor.visit_expr(&right_expr);
visitor.pessimistic_yield = prev_pessimistic;
let target_scopes = visitor.fixup_scopes.pop().unwrap();
debug!("resolve_expr - restoring pessimistic_yield to {}", prev_pessimistic);
visitor.visit_expr(&left_expression);
visitor.visit_expr(&left_expr);
debug!("resolve_expr - fixing up counts to {}", visitor.expr_and_pat_count);
// Remove and process any scopes pushed by the visitor
let target_scopes = visitor.fixup_scopes.drain(start_point..);
for scope in target_scopes {
let mut yield_data = visitor.scope_tree.yield_in_scope.get_mut(&scope).unwrap();
let count = yield_data.expr_and_pat_count;
@ -1083,7 +1074,7 @@ fn resolve_expr<'tcx>(visitor: &mut RegionResolutionVisitor<'tcx>, expr: &'tcx h
visitor.scope_tree.yield_in_scope.insert(scope, data);
if visitor.pessimistic_yield {
debug!("resolve_expr in pessimistic_yield - marking scope {:?} for fixup", scope);
visitor.fixup_scopes.last_mut().unwrap().push(scope);
visitor.fixup_scopes.push(scope);
}
// Keep traversing up while we can.

View file

@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InteriorVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
let live_across_yield = scope.map(|s| {
self.region_scope_tree.yield_in_scope(s).and_then(|yield_data| {
// If we are recording an expression that is the last yield
// in the scope, or that has a postorder CFG index larger
// than the one of all of the yields, then its value can't