Use tidy
to sort crate attributes for all compiler crates.
We already do this for a number of crates, e.g. `rustc_middle`, `rustc_span`, `rustc_metadata`, `rustc_span`, `rustc_errors`. For the ones we don't, in many cases the attributes are a mess. - There is no consistency about order of attribute kinds (e.g. `allow`/`deny`/`feature`). - Within attribute kind groups (e.g. the `feature` attributes), sometimes the order is alphabetical, and sometimes there is no particular order. - Sometimes the attributes of a particular kind aren't even grouped all together, e.g. there might be a `feature`, then an `allow`, then another `feature`. This commit extends the existing sorting to all compiler crates, increasing consistency. If any new attribute line is added there is now only one place it can go -- no need for arbitrary decisions. Exceptions: - `rustc_log`, `rustc_next_trait_solver` and `rustc_type_ir_macros`, because they have no crate attributes. - `rustc_codegen_gcc`, because it's quasi-external to rustc (e.g. it's ignored in `rustfmt.toml`).
This commit is contained in:
parent
ebcb862bbb
commit
75b164d836
58 changed files with 226 additions and 107 deletions
|
@ -30,12 +30,14 @@
|
|||
//! get confused if the spans from leaf AST nodes occur in multiple places
|
||||
//! in the HIR, especially for multiple identifiers.
|
||||
|
||||
// tidy-alphabetical-start
|
||||
#![allow(internal_features)]
|
||||
#![feature(rustdoc_internals)]
|
||||
#![doc(rust_logo)]
|
||||
#![feature(assert_matches)]
|
||||
#![feature(box_patterns)]
|
||||
#![feature(let_chains)]
|
||||
#![feature(rustdoc_internals)]
|
||||
// tidy-alphabetical-end
|
||||
|
||||
use crate::errors::{AssocTyParentheses, AssocTyParenthesesSub, MisplacedImplTrait};
|
||||
use rustc_ast::node_id::NodeMap;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue