more dupe word typos

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/coherence.rs

@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ fn overlap_within_probe<'cx, 'tcx>(
         }
     }
 
-    // We disable the leak when when creating the `snapshot` by using
+    // We disable the leak when creating the `snapshot` by using
     // `infcx.probe_maybe_disable_leak_check`.
     if infcx.leak_check(true, snapshot).is_err() {
         debug!("overlap: leak check failed");

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/const_evaluatable.rs

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ impl<'tcx> ConstUnifyCtxt<'tcx> {
                         a_uv == b_uv
                     }
                     // FIXME(generic_const_exprs): We may want to either actually try
-                    // to evaluate `a_ct` and `b_ct` if they are are fully concrete or something like
+                    // to evaluate `a_ct` and `b_ct` if they are fully concrete or something like
                     // this, for now we just return false here.
                     _ => false,
                 }

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/project.rs

@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'tcx> TypeFolder<'tcx> for AssocTypeNormalizer<'a, 'b, 'tcx> {
                     .unwrap_or_else(|| ty.super_fold_with(self).into())
                 };
                 // For cases like #95134 we would like to catch overflows early
-                // otherwise they slip away away and cause ICE.
+                // otherwise they slip away and cause ICE.
                 let recursion_limit = self.tcx().recursion_limit();
                 if !recursion_limit.value_within_limit(self.depth)
                     // HACK: Don't overflow when running cargo doc see #100991