bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Activity

Match unmatched backticks in comments in compiler/

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
est31 2023-03-03 04:15:15 +01:00
parent ff2c609d66
commit 6df5ae4fb0
24 changed files with 28 additions and 25 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/candidate_assembly.rs
View file

@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
// Essentially any user-written impl will match with an error type,
// so creating `ImplCandidates` isn't useful. However, we might
// end up finding a candidate elsewhere (e.g. a `BuiltinCandidate` for `Sized)
// end up finding a candidate elsewhere (e.g. a `BuiltinCandidate` for `Sized`)
// This helps us avoid overflow: see issue #72839
// Since compilation is already guaranteed to fail, this is just
// to try to show the 'nicest' possible errors to the user.

2
compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs
View file

@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
// Otherwise, we can say that `T: NonAutoTrait` is
// true.
// Let's imagine we have a predicate stack like
// `Foo: Bar -> WF(T) -> T: NonAutoTrait -> T: Auto
// `Foo: Bar -> WF(T) -> T: NonAutoTrait -> T: Auto`
// depth ^1 ^2 ^3
// and the current predicate is `WF(T)`. `wf_args`
// would contain `(T, 1)`. We want to check all