bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Activity

Auto merge of #101241 - camsteffen:refactor-binding-annotations, r=cjgillot

Browse source 
`BindingAnnotation` refactor

* `ast::BindingMode` is deleted and replaced with `hir::BindingAnnotation` (which is moved to `ast`)
* `BindingAnnotation` is changed from an enum to a tuple struct e.g. `BindingAnnotation(ByRef::No, Mutability::Mut)`
* Associated constants added for convenience `BindingAnnotation::{NONE, REF, MUT, REF_MUT}`

One goal is to make it more clear that `BindingAnnotation` merely represents syntax `ref mut` and not the actual binding mode. This was especially confusing since we had `ast::BindingMode`->`hir::BindingAnnotation`->`thir::BindingMode`.

I wish there were more symmetry between `ByRef` and `Mutability` (variant) naming (maybe `Mutable::Yes`?), and I also don't love how long the name `BindingAnnotation` is, but this seems like the best compromise. Ideas welcome.
This commit is contained in:
bors 2022-09-06 03:16:29 +00:00
commit 6c358c67d4
61 changed files with 278 additions and 333 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

13
compiler/rustc_lint/src/builtin.rs
View file

@ -259,17 +259,8 @@ impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for NonShorthandFieldPatterns {
== Some(cx.tcx.field_index(fieldpat.hir_id, cx.typeck_results()))
{
cx.struct_span_lint(NON_SHORTHAND_FIELD_PATTERNS, fieldpat.span, |lint| {
let binding = match binding_annot {
hir::BindingAnnotation::Unannotated => None,
hir::BindingAnnotation::Mutable => Some("mut"),
hir::BindingAnnotation::Ref => Some("ref"),
hir::BindingAnnotation::RefMut => Some("ref mut"),
};
let suggested_ident = if let Some(binding) = binding {
format!("{} {}", binding, ident)
} else {
ident.to_string()
};
let suggested_ident =
format!("{}{}", binding_annot.prefix_str(), ident);
lint.build(fluent::lint::builtin_non_shorthand_field_patterns)
.set_arg("ident", ident.clone())
.span_suggestion(