do not attempt to prove unknowable goals
This commit is contained in:
parent
6199b69c53
commit
6188aae369
5 changed files with 100 additions and 108 deletions
|
@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ use crate::infer::outlives::env::OutlivesEnvironment;
|
|||
use crate::infer::InferOk;
|
||||
use crate::solve::inspect::{InspectGoal, ProofTreeInferCtxtExt, ProofTreeVisitor};
|
||||
use crate::solve::{deeply_normalize_for_diagnostics, inspect};
|
||||
use crate::traits::query::evaluate_obligation::InferCtxtExt;
|
||||
use crate::traits::select::IntercrateAmbiguityCause;
|
||||
use crate::traits::{
|
||||
util, FulfillmentErrorCode, NormalizeExt, Obligation, ObligationCause, PredicateObligation,
|
||||
|
@ -624,14 +625,13 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> for AmbiguityCausesVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
// at ambiguous goals, as for others the coherence unknowable candidate
|
||||
// was irrelevant.
|
||||
match goal.result() {
|
||||
Ok(Certainty::Maybe(_)) => {}
|
||||
Ok(Certainty::Yes) | Err(NoSolution) => return,
|
||||
Ok(Certainty::Maybe(_)) => {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let Goal { param_env, predicate } = goal.goal();
|
||||
|
||||
// For bound predicates we simply call `infcx.enter_forall`
|
||||
// and then prove the resulting predicate as a nested goal.
|
||||
let Goal { param_env, predicate } = goal.goal();
|
||||
let trait_ref = match predicate.kind().no_bound_vars() {
|
||||
Some(ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::Trait(tr))) => tr.trait_ref,
|
||||
Some(ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::Projection(proj)))
|
||||
|
@ -645,7 +645,11 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> for AmbiguityCausesVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
_ => return,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Add ambiguity causes for reservation impls.
|
||||
if trait_ref.references_error() {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let mut candidates = goal.candidates();
|
||||
for cand in goal.candidates() {
|
||||
if let inspect::ProbeKind::TraitCandidate {
|
||||
source: CandidateSource::Impl(def_id),
|
||||
|
@ -664,78 +668,68 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> for AmbiguityCausesVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Add ambiguity causes for unknowable goals.
|
||||
let mut ambiguity_cause = None;
|
||||
for cand in goal.candidates() {
|
||||
if let inspect::ProbeKind::TraitCandidate {
|
||||
source: CandidateSource::CoherenceUnknowable,
|
||||
result: Ok(_),
|
||||
} = cand.kind()
|
||||
{
|
||||
let lazily_normalize_ty = |mut ty: Ty<'tcx>| {
|
||||
if matches!(ty.kind(), ty::Alias(..)) {
|
||||
let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(infcx);
|
||||
ty = ocx
|
||||
.structurally_normalize(&ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env, ty)
|
||||
.map_err(|_| ())?;
|
||||
if !ocx.select_where_possible().is_empty() {
|
||||
return Err(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(ty)
|
||||
};
|
||||
// We also look for unknowable candidates. In case a goal is unknowable, there's
|
||||
// always exactly 1 candidate.
|
||||
let Some(cand) = candidates.pop() else {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
infcx.probe(|_| {
|
||||
match trait_ref_is_knowable(infcx, trait_ref, lazily_normalize_ty) {
|
||||
Err(()) => {}
|
||||
Ok(Ok(())) => warn!("expected an unknowable trait ref: {trait_ref:?}"),
|
||||
Ok(Err(conflict)) => {
|
||||
if !trait_ref.references_error() {
|
||||
// Normalize the trait ref for diagnostics, ignoring any errors if this fails.
|
||||
let trait_ref =
|
||||
deeply_normalize_for_diagnostics(infcx, param_env, trait_ref);
|
||||
let inspect::ProbeKind::TraitCandidate {
|
||||
source: CandidateSource::CoherenceUnknowable,
|
||||
result: Ok(_),
|
||||
} = cand.kind()
|
||||
else {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let self_ty = trait_ref.self_ty();
|
||||
let self_ty = self_ty.has_concrete_skeleton().then(|| self_ty);
|
||||
ambiguity_cause = Some(match conflict {
|
||||
Conflict::Upstream => {
|
||||
IntercrateAmbiguityCause::UpstreamCrateUpdate {
|
||||
trait_ref,
|
||||
self_ty,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Conflict::Downstream => {
|
||||
IntercrateAmbiguityCause::DownstreamCrate {
|
||||
trait_ref,
|
||||
self_ty,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
match cand.result() {
|
||||
// We only add an ambiguity cause if the goal would otherwise
|
||||
// result in an error.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// FIXME: While this matches the behavior of the
|
||||
// old solver, it is not the only way in which the unknowable
|
||||
// candidates *weaken* coherence, they can also force otherwise
|
||||
// successful normalization to be ambiguous.
|
||||
Ok(Certainty::Maybe(_) | Certainty::Yes) => {
|
||||
ambiguity_cause = None;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
Err(NoSolution) => continue,
|
||||
let lazily_normalize_ty = |mut ty: Ty<'tcx>| {
|
||||
if matches!(ty.kind(), ty::Alias(..)) {
|
||||
let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(infcx);
|
||||
ty = ocx
|
||||
.structurally_normalize(&ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env, ty)
|
||||
.map_err(|_| ())?;
|
||||
if !ocx.select_where_possible().is_empty() {
|
||||
return Err(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(ty)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(ambiguity_cause) = ambiguity_cause {
|
||||
self.causes.insert(ambiguity_cause);
|
||||
}
|
||||
infcx.probe(|_| {
|
||||
let conflict = match trait_ref_is_knowable(infcx, trait_ref, lazily_normalize_ty) {
|
||||
Err(()) => return,
|
||||
Ok(Ok(())) => {
|
||||
warn!("expected an unknowable trait ref: {trait_ref:?}");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(Err(conflict)) => conflict,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// It is only relevant that a goal is unknowable if it would have otherwise
|
||||
// failed.
|
||||
let non_intercrate_infcx = infcx.fork_with_intercrate(false);
|
||||
if non_intercrate_infcx.predicate_may_hold(&Obligation::new(
|
||||
infcx.tcx,
|
||||
ObligationCause::dummy(),
|
||||
param_env,
|
||||
predicate,
|
||||
)) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Normalize the trait ref for diagnostics, ignoring any errors if this fails.
|
||||
let trait_ref = deeply_normalize_for_diagnostics(infcx, param_env, trait_ref);
|
||||
let self_ty = trait_ref.self_ty();
|
||||
let self_ty = self_ty.has_concrete_skeleton().then(|| self_ty);
|
||||
self.causes.insert(match conflict {
|
||||
Conflict::Upstream => {
|
||||
IntercrateAmbiguityCause::UpstreamCrateUpdate { trait_ref, self_ty }
|
||||
}
|
||||
Conflict::Downstream => {
|
||||
IntercrateAmbiguityCause::DownstreamCrate { trait_ref, self_ty }
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue