move considering_regions
to the infcx
This commit is contained in:
parent
ceeb5ade20
commit
608625dae9
12 changed files with 75 additions and 88 deletions
|
@ -30,7 +30,9 @@ pub fn codegen_fulfill_obligation<'tcx>(
|
|||
|
||||
// Do the initial selection for the obligation. This yields the
|
||||
// shallow result we are looking for -- that is, what specific impl.
|
||||
tcx.infer_ctxt().with_opaque_type_inference(DefiningAnchor::Bubble).enter(|infcx| {
|
||||
let mut infcx_builder =
|
||||
tcx.infer_ctxt().ignoring_regions().with_opaque_type_inference(DefiningAnchor::Bubble);
|
||||
infcx_builder.enter(|infcx| {
|
||||
//~^ HACK `Bubble` is required for
|
||||
// this test to pass: type-alias-impl-trait/assoc-projection-ice.rs
|
||||
let mut selcx = SelectionContext::new(&infcx);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -15,8 +15,6 @@ use rustc_middle::ty::{self, Ty, TyCtxt};
|
|||
|
||||
pub trait TraitEngineExt<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn new(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>) -> Box<Self>;
|
||||
|
||||
fn new_ignoring_regions(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>) -> Box<Self>;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> TraitEngineExt<'tcx> for dyn TraitEngine<'tcx> {
|
||||
|
@ -27,14 +25,6 @@ impl<'tcx> TraitEngineExt<'tcx> for dyn TraitEngine<'tcx> {
|
|||
Box::new(FulfillmentContext::new())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn new_ignoring_regions(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>) -> Box<Self> {
|
||||
if tcx.sess.opts.unstable_opts.chalk {
|
||||
Box::new(ChalkFulfillmentContext::new())
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Box::new(FulfillmentContext::new_ignoring_regions())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Used if you want to have pleasant experience when dealing
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -58,19 +58,6 @@ pub struct FulfillmentContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
|
||||
relationships: FxHashMap<ty::TyVid, ty::FoundRelationships>,
|
||||
|
||||
// Should this fulfillment context register type-lives-for-region
|
||||
// obligations on its parent infcx? In some cases, region
|
||||
// obligations are either already known to hold (normalization) or
|
||||
// hopefully verified elsewhere (type-impls-bound), and therefore
|
||||
// should not be checked.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Note that if we are normalizing a type that we already
|
||||
// know is well-formed, there should be no harm setting this
|
||||
// to true - all the region variables should be determinable
|
||||
// using the RFC 447 rules, which don't depend on
|
||||
// type-lives-for-region constraints, and because the type
|
||||
// is well-formed, the constraints should hold.
|
||||
register_region_obligations: bool,
|
||||
// Is it OK to register obligations into this infcx inside
|
||||
// an infcx snapshot?
|
||||
//
|
||||
|
@ -103,7 +90,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FulfillmentContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
FulfillmentContext {
|
||||
predicates: ObligationForest::new(),
|
||||
relationships: FxHashMap::default(),
|
||||
register_region_obligations: true,
|
||||
usable_in_snapshot: false,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -112,30 +98,18 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FulfillmentContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
FulfillmentContext {
|
||||
predicates: ObligationForest::new(),
|
||||
relationships: FxHashMap::default(),
|
||||
register_region_obligations: true,
|
||||
usable_in_snapshot: true,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn new_ignoring_regions() -> FulfillmentContext<'tcx> {
|
||||
FulfillmentContext {
|
||||
predicates: ObligationForest::new(),
|
||||
relationships: FxHashMap::default(),
|
||||
register_region_obligations: false,
|
||||
usable_in_snapshot: false,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Attempts to select obligations using `selcx`.
|
||||
fn select(&mut self, selcx: &mut SelectionContext<'a, 'tcx>) -> Vec<FulfillmentError<'tcx>> {
|
||||
let span = debug_span!("select", obligation_forest_size = ?self.predicates.len());
|
||||
let _enter = span.enter();
|
||||
|
||||
// Process pending obligations.
|
||||
let outcome: Outcome<_, _> = self.predicates.process_obligations(&mut FulfillProcessor {
|
||||
selcx,
|
||||
register_region_obligations: self.register_region_obligations,
|
||||
});
|
||||
let outcome: Outcome<_, _> =
|
||||
self.predicates.process_obligations(&mut FulfillProcessor { selcx });
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: if we kept the original cache key, we could mark projection
|
||||
// obligations as complete for the projection cache here.
|
||||
|
@ -239,7 +213,6 @@ impl<'tcx> TraitEngine<'tcx> for FulfillmentContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
|
||||
struct FulfillProcessor<'a, 'b, 'tcx> {
|
||||
selcx: &'a mut SelectionContext<'b, 'tcx>,
|
||||
register_region_obligations: bool,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn mk_pending(os: Vec<PredicateObligation<'_>>) -> Vec<PendingPredicateObligation<'_>> {
|
||||
|
@ -385,19 +358,21 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'tcx> ObligationProcessor for FulfillProcessor<'a, 'b, 'tcx> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::RegionOutlives(data) => {
|
||||
match infcx.region_outlives_predicate(&obligation.cause, Binder::dummy(data)) {
|
||||
Ok(()) => ProcessResult::Changed(vec![]),
|
||||
Err(_) => ProcessResult::Error(CodeSelectionError(Unimplemented)),
|
||||
if infcx.considering_regions || data.has_placeholders() {
|
||||
match infcx
|
||||
.region_outlives_predicate(&obligation.cause, Binder::dummy(data))
|
||||
{
|
||||
Ok(()) => ProcessResult::Changed(vec![]),
|
||||
Err(_) => ProcessResult::Error(CodeSelectionError(Unimplemented)),
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ProcessResult::Changed(vec![])
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::TypeOutlives(ty::OutlivesPredicate(t_a, r_b)) => {
|
||||
if self.register_region_obligations {
|
||||
self.selcx.infcx().register_region_obligation_with_cause(
|
||||
t_a,
|
||||
r_b,
|
||||
&obligation.cause,
|
||||
);
|
||||
if infcx.considering_regions {
|
||||
infcx.register_region_obligation_with_cause(t_a, r_b, &obligation.cause);
|
||||
}
|
||||
ProcessResult::Changed(vec![])
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ pub fn type_known_to_meet_bound_modulo_regions<'a, 'tcx>(
|
|||
// The handling of regions in this area of the code is terrible,
|
||||
// see issue #29149. We should be able to improve on this with
|
||||
// NLL.
|
||||
let mut fulfill_cx = FulfillmentContext::new_ignoring_regions();
|
||||
let mut fulfill_cx = FulfillmentContext::new();
|
||||
|
||||
// We can use a dummy node-id here because we won't pay any mind
|
||||
// to region obligations that arise (there shouldn't really be any
|
||||
|
@ -207,21 +207,21 @@ fn do_normalize_predicates<'tcx>(
|
|||
predicates: Vec<ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
) -> Result<Vec<ty::Predicate<'tcx>>, ErrorGuaranteed> {
|
||||
let span = cause.span;
|
||||
tcx.infer_ctxt().enter(|infcx| {
|
||||
// FIXME. We should really... do something with these region
|
||||
// obligations. But this call just continues the older
|
||||
// behavior (i.e., doesn't cause any new bugs), and it would
|
||||
// take some further refactoring to actually solve them. In
|
||||
// particular, we would have to handle implied bounds
|
||||
// properly, and that code is currently largely confined to
|
||||
// regionck (though I made some efforts to extract it
|
||||
// out). -nmatsakis
|
||||
//
|
||||
// @arielby: In any case, these obligations are checked
|
||||
// by wfcheck anyway, so I'm not sure we have to check
|
||||
// them here too, and we will remove this function when
|
||||
// we move over to lazy normalization *anyway*.
|
||||
let fulfill_cx = FulfillmentContext::new_ignoring_regions();
|
||||
// FIXME. We should really... do something with these region
|
||||
// obligations. But this call just continues the older
|
||||
// behavior (i.e., doesn't cause any new bugs), and it would
|
||||
// take some further refactoring to actually solve them. In
|
||||
// particular, we would have to handle implied bounds
|
||||
// properly, and that code is currently largely confined to
|
||||
// regionck (though I made some efforts to extract it
|
||||
// out). -nmatsakis
|
||||
//
|
||||
// @arielby: In any case, these obligations are checked
|
||||
// by wfcheck anyway, so I'm not sure we have to check
|
||||
// them here too, and we will remove this function when
|
||||
// we move over to lazy normalization *anyway*.
|
||||
tcx.infer_ctxt().ignoring_regions().enter(|infcx| {
|
||||
let fulfill_cx = FulfillmentContext::new();
|
||||
let predicates =
|
||||
match fully_normalize(&infcx, fulfill_cx, cause, elaborated_env, predicates) {
|
||||
Ok(predicates) => predicates,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -207,18 +207,7 @@ fn fulfill_implication<'a, 'tcx>(
|
|||
// (which are packed up in penv)
|
||||
|
||||
infcx.save_and_restore_in_snapshot_flag(|infcx| {
|
||||
// If we came from `translate_substs`, we already know that the
|
||||
// predicates for our impl hold (after all, we know that a more
|
||||
// specialized impl holds, so our impl must hold too), and
|
||||
// we only want to process the projections to determine the
|
||||
// the types in our substs using RFC 447, so we can safely
|
||||
// ignore region obligations, which allows us to avoid threading
|
||||
// a node-id to assign them with.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// If we came from specialization graph construction, then
|
||||
// we already make a mockery out of the region system, so
|
||||
// why not ignore them a bit earlier?
|
||||
let mut fulfill_cx = FulfillmentContext::new_ignoring_regions();
|
||||
let mut fulfill_cx = FulfillmentContext::new();
|
||||
for oblig in obligations.chain(more_obligations) {
|
||||
fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligation(&infcx, oblig);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue