bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Activity

Resolve enum field visibility correctly

Browse source 
Previously, this code treated enum fields' visibility as if they were
struct fields. However, that's not correct because the visibility of a
struct field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is private to the
module it's defined in, whereas the visibility of an *enum* field with
`ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is the visibility of the enum it
belongs to.
This commit is contained in:
Camelid 2020-12-11 19:52:51 -08:00
parent 2225ee1b62
commit 5ce3f4c166
5 changed files with 75 additions and 3 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs
View file

@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
if no_accessible_remaining_fields {
self.report_no_accessible_fields(adt_ty, span);
} else {
self.report_missing_field(adt_ty, span, remaining_fields);
self.report_missing_fields(adt_ty, span, remaining_fields);
}
}
@ -1279,7 +1279,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
///
/// error: aborting due to previous error
/// ```
fn report_missing_field(
fn report_missing_fields(
&self,
adt_ty: Ty<'tcx>,
span: Span,