uplift clippy::clone_double_ref as suspicious_double_ref_op

This commit is contained in:
Deadbeef 2023-04-28 17:17:46 +00:00
parent 1a6ae3d692
commit 5c99175a9e
19 changed files with 230 additions and 199 deletions

View file

@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
use crate::context::LintContext;
use crate::lints::NoopMethodCallDiag;
use crate::lints::{NoopMethodCallDiag, SuspiciousDoubleRefDiag};
use crate::LateContext;
use crate::LateLintPass;
use rustc_hir::def::DefKind;
use rustc_hir::{Expr, ExprKind};
use rustc_middle::ty;
use rustc_middle::ty::adjustment::Adjust;
use rustc_span::symbol::sym;
declare_lint! {
@ -35,14 +36,44 @@ declare_lint! {
"detects the use of well-known noop methods"
}
declare_lint_pass!(NoopMethodCall => [NOOP_METHOD_CALL]);
declare_lint! {
/// The `suspicious_double_ref_op` lint checks for usage of `.clone()`/`.borrow()`/`.deref()`
/// on an `&&T` when `T: !Deref/Borrow/Clone`, which means the call will return the inner `&T`,
/// instead of performing the operation on the underlying `T` and can be confusing.
///
/// ### Example
///
/// ```rust
/// # #![allow(unused)]
/// struct Foo;
/// let foo = &&Foo;
/// let clone: &Foo = foo.clone();
/// ```
///
/// {{produces}}
///
/// ### Explanation
///
/// Since `Foo` doesn't implement `Clone`, running `.clone()` only dereferences the double
/// reference, instead of cloning the inner type which should be what was intended.
pub SUSPICIOUS_DOUBLE_REF_OP,
Warn,
"suspicious call of trait method on `&&T`"
}
declare_lint_pass!(NoopMethodCall => [NOOP_METHOD_CALL, SUSPICIOUS_DOUBLE_REF_OP]);
impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for NoopMethodCall {
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, expr: &'tcx Expr<'_>) {
// We only care about method calls.
let ExprKind::MethodCall(call, receiver, ..) = &expr.kind else {
return
let ExprKind::MethodCall(call, receiver, _, call_span) = &expr.kind else {
return;
};
if call_span.from_expansion() {
return;
}
// We only care about method calls corresponding to the `Clone`, `Deref` and `Borrow`
// traits and ignore any other method call.
let did = match cx.typeck_results().type_dependent_def(expr.hir_id) {
@ -70,25 +101,39 @@ impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for NoopMethodCall {
};
// (Re)check that it implements the noop diagnostic.
let Some(name) = cx.tcx.get_diagnostic_name(i.def_id()) else { return };
if !matches!(
name,
sym::noop_method_borrow | sym::noop_method_clone | sym::noop_method_deref
) {
return;
}
let op = match name {
sym::noop_method_borrow => "borrowing",
sym::noop_method_clone => "cloning",
sym::noop_method_deref => "dereferencing",
_ => return,
};
let receiver_ty = cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(receiver);
let expr_ty = cx.typeck_results().expr_ty_adjusted(expr);
if receiver_ty != expr_ty {
// This lint will only trigger if the receiver type and resulting expression \
// type are the same, implying that the method call is unnecessary.
let arg_adjustments = cx.typeck_results().expr_adjustments(receiver);
// If there is any user defined auto-deref step, then we don't want to warn.
// https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9272
if arg_adjustments.iter().any(|adj| matches!(adj.kind, Adjust::Deref(Some(_)))) {
return;
}
let expr_span = expr.span;
let span = expr_span.with_lo(receiver.span.hi());
cx.emit_spanned_lint(
NOOP_METHOD_CALL,
span,
NoopMethodCallDiag { method: call.ident.name, receiver_ty, label: span },
);
if receiver_ty == expr_ty {
cx.emit_spanned_lint(
NOOP_METHOD_CALL,
span,
NoopMethodCallDiag { method: call.ident.name, receiver_ty, label: span },
);
} else {
cx.emit_spanned_lint(
SUSPICIOUS_DOUBLE_REF_OP,
span,
SuspiciousDoubleRefDiag { call: call.ident.name, ty: expr_ty, op },
)
}
}
}