Rewrite collect_tokens implementations to use a flattened buffer

Instead of trying to collect tokens at each depth, we 'flatten' the
stream as we go allong, pushing open/close delimiters to our buffer
just like regular tokens. One capturing is complete, we reconstruct a
nested `TokenTree::Delimited` structure, producing a normal
`TokenStream`.

The reconstructed `TokenStream` is not created immediately - instead, it is
produced on-demand by a closure (wrapped in a new `LazyTokenStream` type). This
closure stores a clone of the original `TokenCursor`, plus a record of the
number of calls to `next()/next_desugared()`. This is sufficient to reconstruct
the tokenstream seen by the callback without storing any additional state. If
the tokenstream is never used (e.g. when a captured `macro_rules!` argument is
never passed to a proc macro), we never actually create a `TokenStream`.

This implementation has a number of advantages over the previous one:

* It is significantly simpler, with no edge cases around capturing the
  start/end of a delimited group.

* It can be easily extended to allow replacing tokens an an arbitrary
  'depth' by just using `Vec::splice` at the proper position. This is
  important for PR #76130, which requires us to track information about
  attributes along with tokens.

* The lazy approach to `TokenStream` construction allows us to easily
  parse an AST struct, and then decide after the fact whether we need a
  `TokenStream`. This will be useful when we start collecting tokens for
  `Attribute` - we can discard the `LazyTokenStream` if the parsed
  attribute doesn't need tokens (e.g. is a builtin attribute).

The performance impact seems to be neglibile (see
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/77250#issuecomment-703960604). There is a
small slowdown on a few benchmarks, but it only rises above 1% for incremental
builds, where it represents a larger fraction of the much smaller instruction
count. There a ~1% speedup on a few other incremental benchmarks - my guess is
that the speedups and slowdowns will usually cancel out in practice.

compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/attr.rs

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ use rustc_ast::attr;
 use rustc_ast::token::{self, Nonterminal};
 use rustc_ast_pretty::pprust;
 use rustc_errors::{error_code, PResult};
-use rustc_span::Span;
+use rustc_span::{sym, Span};
 
 use tracing::debug;
 
@@ -302,3 +302,16 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
         Err(self.struct_span_err(self.token.span, &msg))
     }
 }
+
+pub fn maybe_needs_tokens(attrs: &[ast::Attribute]) -> bool {
+    attrs.iter().any(|attr| {
+        if let Some(ident) = attr.ident() {
+            ident.name == sym::derive
+            // This might apply a custom attribute/derive
+            || ident.name == sym::cfg_attr
+            || !rustc_feature::is_builtin_attr_name(ident.name)
+        } else {
+            true
+        }
+    })
+}