Obligation::as_goal
This commit is contained in:
parent
aa8f0fd716
commit
575f129faa
7 changed files with 17 additions and 18 deletions
|
@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ impl<'tcx> rustc_next_trait_solver::delegate::SolverDelegate for SolverDelegate<
|
|||
) -> Option<Vec<Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>> {
|
||||
crate::traits::wf::unnormalized_obligations(&self.0, param_env, arg, DUMMY_SP, CRATE_DEF_ID)
|
||||
.map(|obligations| {
|
||||
obligations.into_iter().map(|obligation| obligation.into()).collect()
|
||||
obligations.into_iter().map(|obligation| obligation.as_goal()).collect()
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ impl<'tcx> ObligationStorage<'tcx> {
|
|||
// change.
|
||||
// FIXME: <https://github.com/Gankra/thin-vec/pull/66> is merged, this can be removed.
|
||||
self.overflowed.extend(ExtractIf::new(&mut self.pending, |o| {
|
||||
let goal = o.clone().into();
|
||||
let goal = o.as_goal();
|
||||
let result = <&SolverDelegate<'tcx>>::from(infcx)
|
||||
.evaluate_root_goal(goal, GenerateProofTree::No, o.cause.span)
|
||||
.0;
|
||||
|
@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ where
|
|||
|
||||
let mut has_changed = false;
|
||||
for obligation in self.obligations.unstalled_for_select() {
|
||||
let goal = obligation.clone().into();
|
||||
let goal = obligation.as_goal();
|
||||
let result = <&SolverDelegate<'tcx>>::from(infcx)
|
||||
.evaluate_root_goal(goal, GenerateProofTree::No, obligation.cause.span)
|
||||
.0;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ use rustc_middle::ty::error::{ExpectedFound, TypeError};
|
|||
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, Ty, TyCtxt};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::{bug, span_bug};
|
||||
use rustc_next_trait_solver::solve::{GenerateProofTree, SolverDelegateEvalExt as _};
|
||||
use rustc_type_ir::solve::{Goal, NoSolution};
|
||||
use rustc_type_ir::solve::NoSolution;
|
||||
use tracing::{instrument, trace};
|
||||
|
||||
use crate::solve::Certainty;
|
||||
|
@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ pub(super) fn fulfillment_error_for_stalled<'tcx>(
|
|||
let (code, refine_obligation) = infcx.probe(|_| {
|
||||
match <&SolverDelegate<'tcx>>::from(infcx)
|
||||
.evaluate_root_goal(
|
||||
root_obligation.clone().into(),
|
||||
root_obligation.as_goal(),
|
||||
GenerateProofTree::No,
|
||||
root_obligation.cause.span,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ fn find_best_leaf_obligation<'tcx>(
|
|||
.fudge_inference_if_ok(|| {
|
||||
infcx
|
||||
.visit_proof_tree(
|
||||
obligation.clone().into(),
|
||||
obligation.as_goal(),
|
||||
&mut BestObligation { obligation: obligation.clone(), consider_ambiguities },
|
||||
)
|
||||
.break_value()
|
||||
|
@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ impl<'tcx> BestObligation<'tcx> {
|
|||
{
|
||||
let nested_goal = candidate.instantiate_proof_tree_for_nested_goal(
|
||||
GoalSource::Misc,
|
||||
Goal::new(infcx.tcx, obligation.param_env, obligation.predicate),
|
||||
obligation.as_goal(),
|
||||
self.span(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
// Skip nested goals that aren't the *reason* for our goal's failure.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ fn compute_intercrate_ambiguity_causes<'tcx>(
|
|||
let mut causes: FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause<'tcx>> = Default::default();
|
||||
|
||||
for obligation in obligations {
|
||||
search_ambiguity_causes(infcx, obligation.clone().into(), &mut causes);
|
||||
search_ambiguity_causes(infcx, obligation.as_goal(), &mut causes);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
causes
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue