specialization_graph_of's errored field is used in the only call site, and used to immediately throw away the rest of the value. Let's use Result to statically signal that this is happening

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/specialize/mod.rs

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ use rustc_middle::ty::{self, ImplSubject, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeVisitableExt};
 use rustc_middle::ty::{GenericArgs, GenericArgsRef};
 use rustc_session::lint::builtin::COHERENCE_LEAK_CHECK;
 use rustc_session::lint::builtin::ORDER_DEPENDENT_TRAIT_OBJECTS;
-use rustc_span::{Span, DUMMY_SP};
+use rustc_span::{ErrorGuaranteed, Span, DUMMY_SP};
 
 use super::util;
 use super::SelectionContext;
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ fn fulfill_implication<'tcx>(
 pub(super) fn specialization_graph_provider(
     tcx: TyCtxt<'_>,
     trait_id: DefId,
-) -> specialization_graph::Graph {
+) -> Result<&'_ specialization_graph::Graph, ErrorGuaranteed> {
     let mut sg = specialization_graph::Graph::new();
     let overlap_mode = specialization_graph::OverlapMode::get(tcx, trait_id);
 
@@ -271,6 +271,8 @@ pub(super) fn specialization_graph_provider(
     trait_impls
         .sort_unstable_by_key(|def_id| (-(def_id.krate.as_u32() as i64), def_id.index.index()));
 
+    let mut errored = Ok(());
+
     for impl_def_id in trait_impls {
         if let Some(impl_def_id) = impl_def_id.as_local() {
             // This is where impl overlap checking happens:
@@ -283,15 +285,21 @@ pub(super) fn specialization_graph_provider(
             };
 
             if let Some(overlap) = overlap {
-                report_overlap_conflict(tcx, overlap, impl_def_id, used_to_be_allowed, &mut sg);
+                errored = errored.and(report_overlap_conflict(
+                    tcx,
+                    overlap,
+                    impl_def_id,
+                    used_to_be_allowed,
+                ));
             }
         } else {
             let parent = tcx.impl_parent(impl_def_id).unwrap_or(trait_id);
             sg.record_impl_from_cstore(tcx, parent, impl_def_id)
         }
     }
+    errored?;
 
-    sg
+    Ok(tcx.arena.alloc(sg))
 }
 
 // This function is only used when
@@ -304,36 +312,31 @@ fn report_overlap_conflict<'tcx>(
     overlap: OverlapError<'tcx>,
     impl_def_id: LocalDefId,
     used_to_be_allowed: Option<FutureCompatOverlapErrorKind>,
-    sg: &mut specialization_graph::Graph,
-) {
+) -> Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> {
     let impl_polarity = tcx.impl_polarity(impl_def_id.to_def_id());
     let other_polarity = tcx.impl_polarity(overlap.with_impl);
     match (impl_polarity, other_polarity) {
         (ty::ImplPolarity::Negative, ty::ImplPolarity::Positive) => {
-            report_negative_positive_conflict(
+            Err(report_negative_positive_conflict(
                 tcx,
                 &overlap,
                 impl_def_id,
                 impl_def_id.to_def_id(),
                 overlap.with_impl,
-                sg,
-            );
+            ))
         }
 
         (ty::ImplPolarity::Positive, ty::ImplPolarity::Negative) => {
-            report_negative_positive_conflict(
+            Err(report_negative_positive_conflict(
                 tcx,
                 &overlap,
                 impl_def_id,
                 overlap.with_impl,
                 impl_def_id.to_def_id(),
-                sg,
-            );
+            ))
         }
 
-        _ => {
-            report_conflicting_impls(tcx, overlap, impl_def_id, used_to_be_allowed, sg);
-        }
+        _ => report_conflicting_impls(tcx, overlap, impl_def_id, used_to_be_allowed),
     }
 }
 
@@ -343,16 +346,16 @@ fn report_negative_positive_conflict<'tcx>(
     local_impl_def_id: LocalDefId,
     negative_impl_def_id: DefId,
     positive_impl_def_id: DefId,
-    sg: &mut specialization_graph::Graph,
-) {
-    let err = tcx.dcx().create_err(NegativePositiveConflict {
-        impl_span: tcx.def_span(local_impl_def_id),
-        trait_desc: overlap.trait_ref,
-        self_ty: overlap.self_ty,
-        negative_impl_span: tcx.span_of_impl(negative_impl_def_id),
-        positive_impl_span: tcx.span_of_impl(positive_impl_def_id),
-    });
-    sg.has_errored = Some(err.emit());
+) -> ErrorGuaranteed {
+    tcx.dcx()
+        .create_err(NegativePositiveConflict {
+            impl_span: tcx.def_span(local_impl_def_id),
+            trait_desc: overlap.trait_ref,
+            self_ty: overlap.self_ty,
+            negative_impl_span: tcx.span_of_impl(negative_impl_def_id),
+            positive_impl_span: tcx.span_of_impl(positive_impl_def_id),
+        })
+        .emit()
 }
 
 fn report_conflicting_impls<'tcx>(
@@ -360,8 +363,7 @@ fn report_conflicting_impls<'tcx>(
     overlap: OverlapError<'tcx>,
     impl_def_id: LocalDefId,
     used_to_be_allowed: Option<FutureCompatOverlapErrorKind>,
-    sg: &mut specialization_graph::Graph,
-) {
+) -> Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> {
     let impl_span = tcx.def_span(impl_def_id);
 
     // Work to be done after we've built the DiagnosticBuilder. We have to define it
@@ -429,14 +431,11 @@ fn report_conflicting_impls<'tcx>(
                 let mut err = tcx.dcx().struct_span_err(impl_span, msg);
                 err.code(error_code!(E0119));
                 decorate(tcx, &overlap, impl_span, &mut err);
-                Some(err.emit())
+                err.emit()
             } else {
-                Some(
-                    tcx.dcx()
-                        .span_delayed_bug(impl_span, "impl should have failed the orphan check"),
-                )
+                tcx.dcx().span_delayed_bug(impl_span, "impl should have failed the orphan check")
             };
-            sg.has_errored = reported;
+            Err(reported)
         }
         Some(kind) => {
             let lint = match kind {
@@ -452,8 +451,9 @@ fn report_conflicting_impls<'tcx>(
                     decorate(tcx, &overlap, impl_span, err);
                 },
             );
+            Ok(())
         }
-    };
+    }
 }
 
 /// Recovers the "impl X for Y" signature from `impl_def_id` and returns it as a