1
Fork 0

Rollup merge of #139615 - nnethercote:rm-name_or_empty, r=jdonszelmann

Remove `name_or_empty`

Another step towards #137978.

r? ``@jdonszelmann``
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Krüger 2025-04-18 05:16:29 +02:00 committed by GitHub
commit 540fb228af
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
42 changed files with 309 additions and 226 deletions

View file

@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ pub fn eval_condition(
};
match &cfg.kind {
MetaItemKind::List(mis) if cfg.name_or_empty() == sym::version => {
MetaItemKind::List(mis) if cfg.has_name(sym::version) => {
try_gate_cfg(sym::version, cfg.span, sess, features);
let (min_version, span) = match &mis[..] {
[MetaItemInner::Lit(MetaItemLit { kind: LitKind::Str(sym, ..), span, .. })] => {
@ -149,18 +149,18 @@ pub fn eval_condition(
// The unwraps below may look dangerous, but we've already asserted
// that they won't fail with the loop above.
match cfg.name_or_empty() {
sym::any => mis
match cfg.name() {
Some(sym::any) => mis
.iter()
// We don't use any() here, because we want to evaluate all cfg condition
// as eval_condition can (and does) extra checks
.fold(false, |res, mi| res | eval_condition(mi, sess, features, eval)),
sym::all => mis
Some(sym::all) => mis
.iter()
// We don't use all() here, because we want to evaluate all cfg condition
// as eval_condition can (and does) extra checks
.fold(true, |res, mi| res & eval_condition(mi, sess, features, eval)),
sym::not => {
Some(sym::not) => {
let [mi] = mis.as_slice() else {
dcx.emit_err(session_diagnostics::ExpectedOneCfgPattern { span: cfg.span });
return false;
@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ pub fn eval_condition(
!eval_condition(mi, sess, features, eval)
}
sym::target => {
Some(sym::target) => {
if let Some(features) = features
&& !features.cfg_target_compact()
{

View file

@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ impl<'sess> AttributeParser<'sess> {
// if we're only looking for a single attribute,
// skip all the ones we don't care about
if let Some(expected) = self.parse_only {
if attr.name_or_empty() != expected {
if !attr.has_name(expected) {
continue;
}
}
@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ impl<'sess> AttributeParser<'sess> {
// that's expanded right? But no, sometimes, when parsing attributes on macros,
// we already use the lowering logic and these are still there. So, when `omit_doc`
// is set we *also* want to ignore these
if omit_doc == OmitDoc::Skip && attr.name_or_empty() == sym::doc {
if omit_doc == OmitDoc::Skip && attr.has_name(sym::doc) {
continue;
}
@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ impl<'sess> AttributeParser<'sess> {
}))
}
// // FIXME: make doc attributes go through a proper attribute parser
// ast::AttrKind::Normal(n) if n.name_or_empty() == sym::doc => {
// ast::AttrKind::Normal(n) if n.has_name(sym::doc) => {
// let p = GenericMetaItemParser::from_attr(&n, self.dcx());
//
// attributes.push(Attribute::Parsed(AttributeKind::DocComment {