bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Activity

Spellchecking compiler comments

Browse source 
This PR cleans up the rest of the spelling mistakes in the compiler comments. This PR does not change any literal or code spelling issues.
This commit is contained in:
Yuri Astrakhan 2022-03-30 15:14:15 -04:00
parent 3e7514670d
commit 5160f8f843
116 changed files with 171 additions and 171 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/project.rs
View file

@ -1566,7 +1566,7 @@ fn assemble_candidates_from_impls<'cx, 'tcx>(
// fn bar<T:SomeTrait<Foo=usize>>(...) { ... }
// ```
//
// Doesn't the `T : Sometrait<Foo=usize>` predicate help
// Doesn't the `T : SomeTrait<Foo=usize>` predicate help
// resolve `T::Foo`? And of course it does, but in fact
// that single predicate is desugared into two predicates
// in the compiler: a trait predicate (`T : SomeTrait`) and a
@ -1989,7 +1989,7 @@ fn confirm_impl_candidate<'cx, 'tcx>(
// Get obligations corresponding to the predicates from the where-clause of the
// associated type itself.
// Note: `feature(generic_associated_types)` is required to write such
// predicates, even for non-generic associcated types.
// predicates, even for non-generic associated types.
fn assoc_ty_own_obligations<'cx, 'tcx>(
selcx: &mut SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx>,
obligation: &ProjectionTyObligation<'tcx>,