Use the opaque_types_defined_by query to cheaply check for whether a hidden type may be registered for an opaque type
This commit is contained in:
parent
6ae803eedf
commit
4e92f761fe
17 changed files with 368 additions and 162 deletions
|
@ -55,3 +55,11 @@ ty_utils_multiple_array_fields_simd_type = monomorphising SIMD type `{$ty}` with
|
|||
ty_utils_oversized_simd_type = monomorphising SIMD type `{$ty}` of length greater than {$max_lanes}
|
||||
|
||||
ty_utils_non_primitive_simd_type = monomorphising SIMD type `{$ty}` with a non-primitive-scalar (integer/float/pointer) element type `{$e_ty}`
|
||||
|
||||
ty_utils_impl_trait_duplicate_arg = non-defining opaque type use in defining scope
|
||||
.label = generic argument `{$arg}` used twice
|
||||
.note = for this opaque type
|
||||
|
||||
ty_utils_impl_trait_not_param = non-defining opaque type use in defining scope
|
||||
.label = argument `{$arg}` is not a generic parameter
|
||||
.note = for this opaque type
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue