Fix a numerical underflow in tuple wrap suggestion

This commit is contained in:
Michael Goulet 2022-07-19 22:47:00 +00:00
parent 29c5a028b0
commit 43c0c63eda
3 changed files with 26 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -575,6 +575,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
// If so, we might have just forgotten to wrap some args in a tuple.
if let Some(ty::Tuple(tys)) =
formal_and_expected_inputs.get(mismatch_idx.into()).map(|tys| tys.1.kind())
// If the tuple is unit, we're not actually wrapping any arguments.
&& !tys.is_empty()
&& provided_arg_tys.len() == formal_and_expected_inputs.len() - 1 + tys.len()
{
// Wrap up the N provided arguments starting at this position in a tuple.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
fn main() {
let f = |_: (), f: fn()| f;
let _f = f(main);
//~^ ERROR this function takes 2 arguments but 1 argument was supplied
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
error[E0057]: this function takes 2 arguments but 1 argument was supplied
--> $DIR/issue-99482.rs:3:14
|
LL | let _f = f(main);
| ^ ---- an argument of type `()` is missing
|
note: closure defined here
--> $DIR/issue-99482.rs:2:13
|
LL | let f = |_: (), f: fn()| f;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: provide the argument
|
LL | let _f = f((), main);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0057`.