1
Fork 0

Rollup merge of #119577 - tmiasko:lint, r=oli-obk

Migrate memory overlap check from validator to lint

The check attempts to identify potential undefined behaviour, rather
than whether MIR is well-formed. It belongs in the lint not validator.

Follow up to changes from #119077.
This commit is contained in:
Michael Goulet 2024-01-05 10:57:22 -05:00 committed by GitHub
commit 3a983ad3b0
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
13 changed files with 115 additions and 264 deletions

View file

@ -74,7 +74,6 @@ impl<'tcx> MirPass<'tcx> for Validator {
mir_phase,
unwind_edge_count: 0,
reachable_blocks: traversal::reachable_as_bitset(body),
place_cache: FxHashSet::default(),
value_cache: FxHashSet::default(),
can_unwind,
};
@ -106,7 +105,6 @@ struct CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
mir_phase: MirPhase,
unwind_edge_count: usize,
reachable_blocks: BitSet<BasicBlock>,
place_cache: FxHashSet<PlaceRef<'tcx>>,
value_cache: FxHashSet<u128>,
// If `false`, then the MIR must not contain `UnwindAction::Continue` or
// `TerminatorKind::Resume`.
@ -294,19 +292,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
fn visit_statement(&mut self, statement: &Statement<'tcx>, location: Location) {
match &statement.kind {
StatementKind::Assign(box (dest, rvalue)) => {
// FIXME(JakobDegen): Check this for all rvalues, not just this one.
if let Rvalue::Use(Operand::Copy(src) | Operand::Move(src)) = rvalue {
// The sides of an assignment must not alias. Currently this just checks whether
// the places are identical.
if dest == src {
self.fail(
location,
"encountered `Assign` statement with overlapping memory",
);
}
}
}
StatementKind::AscribeUserType(..) => {
if self.mir_phase >= MirPhase::Runtime(RuntimePhase::Initial) {
self.fail(
@ -341,7 +326,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
self.fail(location, format!("explicit `{kind:?}` is forbidden"));
}
}
StatementKind::StorageLive(_)
StatementKind::Assign(..)
| StatementKind::StorageLive(_)
| StatementKind::StorageDead(_)
| StatementKind::Intrinsic(_)
| StatementKind::Coverage(_)
@ -404,10 +390,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
}
// The call destination place and Operand::Move place used as an argument might be
// passed by a reference to the callee. Consequently they must be non-overlapping
// and cannot be packed. Currently this simply checks for duplicate places.
self.place_cache.clear();
self.place_cache.insert(destination.as_ref());
// passed by a reference to the callee. Consequently they cannot be packed.
if is_within_packed(self.tcx, &self.body.local_decls, *destination).is_some() {
// This is bad! The callee will expect the memory to be aligned.
self.fail(
@ -418,10 +401,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
),
);
}
let mut has_duplicates = false;
for arg in args {
if let Operand::Move(place) = arg {
has_duplicates |= !self.place_cache.insert(place.as_ref());
if is_within_packed(self.tcx, &self.body.local_decls, *place).is_some() {
// This is bad! The callee will expect the memory to be aligned.
self.fail(
@ -434,16 +415,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
}
}
}
if has_duplicates {
self.fail(
location,
format!(
"encountered overlapping memory in `Move` arguments to `Call` terminator: {:?}",
terminator.kind,
),
);
}
}
TerminatorKind::Assert { target, unwind, .. } => {
self.check_edge(location, *target, EdgeKind::Normal);
@ -1112,17 +1083,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
)
}
}
// FIXME(JakobDegen): Check this for all rvalues, not just this one.
if let Rvalue::Use(Operand::Copy(src) | Operand::Move(src)) = rvalue {
// The sides of an assignment must not alias. Currently this just checks whether
// the places are identical.
if dest == src {
self.fail(
location,
"encountered `Assign` statement with overlapping memory",
);
}
}
}
StatementKind::AscribeUserType(..) => {
if self.mir_phase >= MirPhase::Runtime(RuntimePhase::Initial) {