Rephrase term 'non-pointer type'
If the reader assumes that 'pointer type's include 'smart pointer's, the term 'non-pointer type' could mislead the reader to assume that x should not be a smart pointer type. I tried to rephrase the term 'non-pointer type' to remove ambiguity in the doc comments. closes #72335 Thank you for reviewing this PR! :)
This commit is contained in:
parent
f6072cab13
commit
3048a41a5a
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
|
|||
///
|
||||
/// If `T` implements `Deref<Target = U>`, and `x` is a value of type `T`, then:
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// * In immutable contexts, `*x` on non-pointer types is equivalent to
|
||||
/// `*Deref::deref(&x)`.
|
||||
/// * In immutable contexts, `*x` (where `T` is neither a reference nor a raw pointer)
|
||||
/// is equivalent to `*Deref::deref(&x)`.
|
||||
/// * Values of type `&T` are coerced to values of type `&U`
|
||||
/// * `T` implicitly implements all the (immutable) methods of the type `U`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
|
@ -115,8 +115,8 @@ impl<T: ?Sized> Deref for &mut T {
|
|||
/// If `T` implements `DerefMut<Target = U>`, and `x` is a value of type `T`,
|
||||
/// then:
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// * In mutable contexts, `*x` on non-pointer types is equivalent to
|
||||
/// `*DerefMut::deref_mut(&mut x)`.
|
||||
/// * In mutable contexts, `*x` (where `T` is neither a reference nor a raw pointer)
|
||||
/// is equivalent to `*DerefMut::deref_mut(&mut x)`.
|
||||
/// * Values of type `&mut T` are coerced to values of type `&mut U`
|
||||
/// * `T` implicitly implements all the (mutable) methods of the type `U`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue