stop using ParamEnv::reveal while handling MIR

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/check_consts/check.rs

@@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for Checker<'_, 'tcx> {
                 // Typeck only does a "non-const" check since it operates on HIR and cannot distinguish
                 // which path expressions are getting called on and which path expressions are only used
                 // as function pointers. This is required for correctness.
-                let infcx = tcx.infer_ctxt().build(body.phase.typing_mode());
+                let infcx = tcx.infer_ctxt().build(body.typing_mode(tcx));
                 let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new_with_diagnostics(&infcx);
 
                 let predicates = tcx.predicates_of(callee).instantiate(tcx, fn_args);

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/check_consts/ops.rs

@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ impl<'tcx> NonConstOp<'tcx> for FnCallNonConst<'tcx> {
                     let obligation =
                         Obligation::new(tcx, ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env, trait_ref);
 
-                    let infcx = tcx.infer_ctxt().build(body.phase.typing_mode());
+                    let infcx = tcx.infer_ctxt().build(body.typing_mode(tcx));
                     let mut selcx = SelectionContext::new(&infcx);
                     let implsrc = selcx.select(&obligation);
 

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/eval_context.rs

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ use rustc_errors::DiagCtxtHandle;
 use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
 use rustc_infer::infer::TyCtxtInferExt;
 use rustc_infer::infer::at::ToTrace;
-use rustc_infer::traits::ObligationCause;
+use rustc_infer::traits::{ObligationCause, Reveal};
 use rustc_middle::mir::interpret::{ErrorHandled, InvalidMetaKind, ReportedErrorInfo};
 use rustc_middle::query::TyCtxtAt;
 use rustc_middle::ty::layout::{
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ impl<'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> FnAbiOfHelpers<'tcx> for InterpCx<'tcx, M> {
 /// This test should be symmetric, as it is primarily about layout compatibility.
 pub(super) fn mir_assign_valid_types<'tcx>(
     tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
+    typing_mode: TypingMode<'tcx>,
     param_env: ParamEnv<'tcx>,
     src: TyAndLayout<'tcx>,
     dest: TyAndLayout<'tcx>,
@@ -124,7 +125,7 @@ pub(super) fn mir_assign_valid_types<'tcx>(
     // all normal lifetimes are erased, higher-ranked types with their
     // late-bound lifetimes are still around and can lead to type
     // differences.
-    if util::relate_types(tcx, param_env, Variance::Covariant, src.ty, dest.ty) {
+    if util::relate_types(tcx, typing_mode, param_env, Variance::Covariant, src.ty, dest.ty) {
         // Make sure the layout is equal, too -- just to be safe. Miri really
         // needs layout equality. For performance reason we skip this check when
         // the types are equal. Equal types *can* have different layouts when
@@ -144,6 +145,7 @@ pub(super) fn mir_assign_valid_types<'tcx>(
 #[cfg_attr(not(debug_assertions), inline(always))]
 pub(super) fn from_known_layout<'tcx>(
     tcx: TyCtxtAt<'tcx>,
+    typing_mode: TypingMode<'tcx>,
     param_env: ParamEnv<'tcx>,
     known_layout: Option<TyAndLayout<'tcx>>,
     compute: impl FnOnce() -> InterpResult<'tcx, TyAndLayout<'tcx>>,
@@ -153,7 +155,13 @@ pub(super) fn from_known_layout<'tcx>(
         Some(known_layout) => {
             if cfg!(debug_assertions) {
                 let check_layout = compute()?;
-                if !mir_assign_valid_types(tcx.tcx, param_env, check_layout, known_layout) {
+                if !mir_assign_valid_types(
+                    tcx.tcx,
+                    typing_mode,
+                    param_env,
+                    check_layout,
+                    known_layout,
+                ) {
                     span_bug!(
                         tcx.span,
                         "expected type differs from actual type.\nexpected: {}\nactual: {}",
@@ -203,6 +211,11 @@ impl<'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> InterpCx<'tcx, M> {
         }
     }
 
+    pub fn typing_mode(&self) -> TypingMode<'tcx> {
+        debug_assert_eq!(self.param_env.reveal(), Reveal::All);
+        TypingMode::PostAnalysis
+    }
+
     /// Returns the span of the currently executed statement/terminator.
     /// This is the span typically used for error reporting.
     #[inline(always)]
@@ -327,7 +340,7 @@ impl<'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> InterpCx<'tcx, M> {
             return true;
         }
         // Slow path: spin up an inference context to check if these traits are sufficiently equal.
-        let infcx = self.tcx.infer_ctxt().build(TypingMode::from_param_env(self.param_env));
+        let infcx = self.tcx.infer_ctxt().build(self.typing_mode());
         let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(&infcx);
         let cause = ObligationCause::dummy_with_span(self.cur_span());
         // equate the two trait refs after normalization

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/operand.rs

@@ -773,6 +773,7 @@ impl<'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> InterpCx<'tcx, M> {
                 )?;
             if !mir_assign_valid_types(
                 *self.tcx,
+                self.typing_mode(),
                 self.param_env,
                 self.layout_of(normalized_place_ty)?,
                 op.layout,
@@ -832,7 +833,9 @@ impl<'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> InterpCx<'tcx, M> {
             })
         };
         let layout =
-            from_known_layout(self.tcx, self.param_env, layout, || self.layout_of(ty).into())?;
+            from_known_layout(self.tcx, self.typing_mode(), self.param_env, layout, || {
+                self.layout_of(ty).into()
+            })?;
         let imm = match val_val {
             mir::ConstValue::Indirect { alloc_id, offset } => {
                 // This is const data, no mutation allowed.

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/place.rs

@@ -540,6 +540,7 @@ where
                 )?;
             if !mir_assign_valid_types(
                 *self.tcx,
+                self.typing_mode(),
                 self.param_env,
                 self.layout_of(normalized_place_ty)?,
                 place.layout,
@@ -870,8 +871,13 @@ where
     ) -> InterpResult<'tcx> {
         // We do NOT compare the types for equality, because well-typed code can
         // actually "transmute" `&mut T` to `&T` in an assignment without a cast.
-        let layout_compat =
-            mir_assign_valid_types(*self.tcx, self.param_env, src.layout(), dest.layout());
+        let layout_compat = mir_assign_valid_types(
+            *self.tcx,
+            self.typing_mode(),
+            self.param_env,
+            src.layout(),
+            dest.layout(),
+        );
         if !allow_transmute && !layout_compat {
             span_bug!(
                 self.cur_span(),

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/stack.rs

@@ -596,12 +596,13 @@ impl<'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> InterpCx<'tcx, M> {
             return interp_ok(layout);
         }
 
-        let layout = from_known_layout(self.tcx, self.param_env, layout, || {
-            let local_ty = frame.body.local_decls[local].ty;
-            let local_ty =
-                self.instantiate_from_frame_and_normalize_erasing_regions(frame, local_ty)?;
-            self.layout_of(local_ty).into()
-        })?;
+        let layout =
+            from_known_layout(self.tcx, self.typing_mode(), self.param_env, layout, || {
+                let local_ty = frame.body.local_decls[local].ty;
+                let local_ty =
+                    self.instantiate_from_frame_and_normalize_erasing_regions(frame, local_ty)?;
+                self.layout_of(local_ty).into()
+            })?;
 
         // Layouts of locals are requested a lot, so we cache them.
         state.layout.set(Some(layout));

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/util/compare_types.rs

@@ -8,24 +8,15 @@ use rustc_middle::traits::ObligationCause;
 use rustc_middle::ty::{ParamEnv, Ty, TyCtxt, TypingMode, Variance};
 use rustc_trait_selection::traits::ObligationCtxt;
 
-/// Returns whether the two types are equal up to subtyping.
-///
-/// This is used in case we don't know the expected subtyping direction
-/// and still want to check whether anything is broken.
-pub fn is_equal_up_to_subtyping<'tcx>(
+/// Returns whether `src` is a subtype of `dest`, i.e. `src <: dest`.
+pub fn sub_types<'tcx>(
     tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
+    typing_mode: TypingMode<'tcx>,
     param_env: ParamEnv<'tcx>,
     src: Ty<'tcx>,
     dest: Ty<'tcx>,
 ) -> bool {
-    // Fast path.
-    if src == dest {
-        return true;
-    }
-
-    // Check for subtyping in either direction.
-    relate_types(tcx, param_env, Variance::Covariant, src, dest)
-        || relate_types(tcx, param_env, Variance::Covariant, dest, src)
+    relate_types(tcx, typing_mode, param_env, Variance::Covariant, src, dest)
 }
 
 /// Returns whether `src` is a subtype of `dest`, i.e. `src <: dest`.
@@ -35,6 +26,7 @@ pub fn is_equal_up_to_subtyping<'tcx>(
 /// because we want to check for type equality.
 pub fn relate_types<'tcx>(
     tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
+    typing_mode: TypingMode<'tcx>,
     param_env: ParamEnv<'tcx>,
     variance: Variance,
     src: Ty<'tcx>,
@@ -45,8 +37,7 @@ pub fn relate_types<'tcx>(
     }
 
     let mut builder = tcx.infer_ctxt().ignoring_regions();
-    // FIXME(#132279): This should eventually use the already defined hidden types.
-    let infcx = builder.build(TypingMode::from_param_env(param_env));
+    let infcx = builder.build(typing_mode);
     let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(&infcx);
     let cause = ObligationCause::dummy();
     let src = ocx.normalize(&cause, param_env, src);

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/util/mod.rs

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ mod type_name;
 
 pub use self::alignment::{is_disaligned, is_within_packed};
 pub use self::check_validity_requirement::check_validity_requirement;
-pub use self::compare_types::{is_equal_up_to_subtyping, relate_types};
+pub use self::compare_types::{relate_types, sub_types};
 pub use self::type_name::type_name;
 
 /// Classify whether an operator is "left-homogeneous", i.e., the LHS has the