Rollup merge of #98713 - nikomatsakis:issue-98693, r=jackh726
promote placeholder bounds to 'static obligations In NLL, when we are promoting a bound out from a closure, if we have a requirement that `T: 'a` where `'a` is in a higher universe, we were previously ignoring that, which is totally wrong. We should be promoting those constraints to `'static`, since universes are not expressible across closure boundaries. Fixes #98693 ~~(Marking as WIP because I'm still running tests, haven't add the new test, etc)~~ r? ``@jackh726``
This commit is contained in:
commit
2cb7d1c933
5 changed files with 85 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -917,6 +917,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
/// The idea then is to lower the `T: 'X` constraint into multiple
|
||||
/// bounds -- e.g., if `'X` is the union of two free lifetimes,
|
||||
/// `'1` and `'2`, then we would create `T: '1` and `T: '2`.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, infcx, propagated_outlives_requirements))]
|
||||
fn try_promote_type_test(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'_, 'tcx>,
|
||||
|
@ -934,11 +935,41 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
debug!("subject = {:?}", subject);
|
||||
|
||||
let r_scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(*lower_bound);
|
||||
|
||||
debug!(
|
||||
"lower_bound = {:?} r_scc={:?} universe={:?}",
|
||||
lower_bound, r_scc, self.scc_universes[r_scc]
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// If the type test requires that `T: 'a` where `'a` is a
|
||||
// placeholder from another universe, that effectively requires
|
||||
// `T: 'static`, so we have to propagate that requirement.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// It doesn't matter *what* universe because the promoted `T` will
|
||||
// always be in the root universe.
|
||||
if let Some(p) = self.scc_values.placeholders_contained_in(r_scc).next() {
|
||||
debug!("encountered placeholder in higher universe: {:?}, requiring 'static", p);
|
||||
let static_r = self.universal_regions.fr_static;
|
||||
propagated_outlives_requirements.push(ClosureOutlivesRequirement {
|
||||
subject,
|
||||
outlived_free_region: static_r,
|
||||
blame_span: locations.span(body),
|
||||
category: ConstraintCategory::Boring,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// we can return here -- the code below might push add'l constraints
|
||||
// but they would all be weaker than this one.
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// For each region outlived by lower_bound find a non-local,
|
||||
// universal region (it may be the same region) and add it to
|
||||
// `ClosureOutlivesRequirement`.
|
||||
let r_scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(*lower_bound);
|
||||
for ur in self.scc_values.universal_regions_outlived_by(r_scc) {
|
||||
debug!("universal_region_outlived_by ur={:?}", ur);
|
||||
// Check whether we can already prove that the "subject" outlives `ur`.
|
||||
// If so, we don't have to propagate this requirement to our caller.
|
||||
//
|
||||
|
@ -963,8 +994,6 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
debug!("try_promote_type_test: ur={:?}", ur);
|
||||
|
||||
let non_local_ub = self.universal_region_relations.non_local_upper_bounds(ur);
|
||||
debug!("try_promote_type_test: non_local_ub={:?}", non_local_ub);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1001,6 +1030,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
/// will use it's *external name*, which will be a `RegionKind`
|
||||
/// variant that can be used in query responses such as
|
||||
/// `ReEarlyBound`.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, infcx))]
|
||||
fn try_promote_type_test_subject(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'_, 'tcx>,
|
||||
|
@ -1008,8 +1038,6 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
) -> Option<ClosureOutlivesSubject<'tcx>> {
|
||||
let tcx = infcx.tcx;
|
||||
|
||||
debug!("try_promote_type_test_subject(ty = {:?})", ty);
|
||||
|
||||
let ty = tcx.fold_regions(ty, |r, _depth| {
|
||||
let region_vid = self.to_region_vid(r);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue