1
Fork 0

reduce false positives of tail-expr-drop-order from consumed values

take 2

open up coroutines

tweak the wordings

the lint works up until 2021

We were missing one case, for ADTs, which was
causing `Result` to yield incorrect results.

only include field spans with significant types

deduplicate and eliminate field spans

switch to emit spans to impl Drops

Co-authored-by: Niko Matsakis <nikomat@amazon.com>

collect drops instead of taking liveness diff

apply some suggestions and add explantory notes

small fix on the cache

let the query recurse through coroutine

new suggestion format with extracted variable name

fine-tune the drop span and messages

bugfix on runtime borrows

tweak message wording

filter out ecosystem types earlier

apply suggestions

clippy

check lint level at session level

further restrict applicability of the lint

translate bid into nop for stable mir

detect cycle in type structure
This commit is contained in:
Ding Xiang Fei 2024-09-02 01:13:07 +08:00
parent 70e814bd9e
commit 297b618944
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 3CD748647EEF6359
58 changed files with 2015 additions and 538 deletions

View file

@ -772,9 +772,6 @@ lint_suspicious_double_ref_clone =
lint_suspicious_double_ref_deref =
using `.deref()` on a double reference, which returns `{$ty}` instead of dereferencing the inner type
lint_tail_expr_drop_order = these values and local bindings have significant drop implementation that will have a different drop order from that of Edition 2021
.label = these values have significant drop implementation and will observe changes in drop order under Edition 2024
lint_trailing_semi_macro = trailing semicolon in macro used in expression position
.note1 = macro invocations at the end of a block are treated as expressions
.note2 = to ignore the value produced by the macro, add a semicolon after the invocation of `{$name}`