Improve check-cfg Cargo macro diagnostic with crate name
This commit is contained in:
parent
e3e5bd95cd
commit
291c519c69
5 changed files with 19 additions and 14 deletions
|
@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ lint_unexpected_cfg_add_build_rs_println = or consider adding `{$build_rs_printl
|
|||
lint_unexpected_cfg_add_cargo_feature = consider using a Cargo feature instead
|
||||
lint_unexpected_cfg_add_cargo_toml_lint_cfg = or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:{$cargo_toml_lint_cfg}
|
||||
lint_unexpected_cfg_add_cmdline_arg = to expect this configuration use `{$cmdline_arg}`
|
||||
lint_unexpected_cfg_cargo_update = the {$macro_kind} `{$macro_name}` may come from an old version of it's defining crate, try updating your dependencies with `cargo update`
|
||||
lint_unexpected_cfg_cargo_update = the {$macro_kind} `{$macro_name}` may come from an old version of the `{$crate_name}` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p {$crate_name}`
|
||||
|
||||
lint_unexpected_cfg_define_features = consider defining some features in `Cargo.toml`
|
||||
lint_unexpected_cfg_doc_cargo = see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ mod check_cfg;
|
|||
|
||||
pub(super) fn decorate_lint(
|
||||
sess: &Session,
|
||||
_tcx: Option<TyCtxt<'_>>,
|
||||
tcx: Option<TyCtxt<'_>>,
|
||||
diagnostic: BuiltinLintDiag,
|
||||
diag: &mut Diag<'_, ()>,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
|
@ -205,10 +205,10 @@ pub(super) fn decorate_lint(
|
|||
.decorate_lint(diag);
|
||||
}
|
||||
BuiltinLintDiag::UnexpectedCfgName(name, value) => {
|
||||
check_cfg::unexpected_cfg_name(sess, name, value).decorate_lint(diag);
|
||||
check_cfg::unexpected_cfg_name(sess, tcx, name, value).decorate_lint(diag);
|
||||
}
|
||||
BuiltinLintDiag::UnexpectedCfgValue(name, value) => {
|
||||
check_cfg::unexpected_cfg_value(sess, name, value).decorate_lint(diag);
|
||||
check_cfg::unexpected_cfg_value(sess, tcx, name, value).decorate_lint(diag);
|
||||
}
|
||||
BuiltinLintDiag::DeprecatedWhereclauseLocation(left_sp, sugg) => {
|
||||
let suggestion = match sugg {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
|||
use rustc_hir::def_id::LOCAL_CRATE;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::bug;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::TyCtxt;
|
||||
use rustc_session::Session;
|
||||
use rustc_session::config::ExpectedValues;
|
||||
use rustc_span::edit_distance::find_best_match_for_name;
|
||||
|
@ -73,17 +74,20 @@ fn rustc_macro_help(span: Span) -> Option<lints::UnexpectedCfgRustcMacroHelp> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn cargo_macro_help(span: Span) -> Option<lints::UnexpectedCfgCargoMacroHelp> {
|
||||
fn cargo_macro_help(
|
||||
tcx: Option<TyCtxt<'_>>,
|
||||
span: Span,
|
||||
) -> Option<lints::UnexpectedCfgCargoMacroHelp> {
|
||||
let oexpn = span.ctxt().outer_expn_data();
|
||||
if let Some(def_id) = oexpn.macro_def_id
|
||||
&& let ExpnKind::Macro(macro_kind, macro_name) = oexpn.kind
|
||||
&& def_id.krate != LOCAL_CRATE
|
||||
&& let Some(tcx) = tcx
|
||||
{
|
||||
Some(lints::UnexpectedCfgCargoMacroHelp {
|
||||
macro_kind: macro_kind.descr(),
|
||||
macro_name,
|
||||
// FIXME: Get access to a `TyCtxt` from an `EarlyContext`
|
||||
// crate_name: cx.tcx.crate_name(def_id.krate),
|
||||
crate_name: tcx.crate_name(def_id.krate),
|
||||
})
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
@ -92,6 +96,7 @@ fn cargo_macro_help(span: Span) -> Option<lints::UnexpectedCfgCargoMacroHelp> {
|
|||
|
||||
pub(super) fn unexpected_cfg_name(
|
||||
sess: &Session,
|
||||
tcx: Option<TyCtxt<'_>>,
|
||||
(name, name_span): (Symbol, Span),
|
||||
value: Option<(Symbol, Span)>,
|
||||
) -> lints::UnexpectedCfgName {
|
||||
|
@ -223,7 +228,7 @@ pub(super) fn unexpected_cfg_name(
|
|||
};
|
||||
lints::unexpected_cfg_name::InvocationHelp::Cargo {
|
||||
help,
|
||||
macro_help: cargo_macro_help(name_span),
|
||||
macro_help: cargo_macro_help(tcx, name_span),
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
let help = lints::UnexpectedCfgRustcHelp::new(&inst(EscapeQuotes::No));
|
||||
|
@ -238,6 +243,7 @@ pub(super) fn unexpected_cfg_name(
|
|||
|
||||
pub(super) fn unexpected_cfg_value(
|
||||
sess: &Session,
|
||||
tcx: Option<TyCtxt<'_>>,
|
||||
(name, name_span): (Symbol, Span),
|
||||
value: Option<(Symbol, Span)>,
|
||||
) -> lints::UnexpectedCfgValue {
|
||||
|
@ -339,7 +345,7 @@ pub(super) fn unexpected_cfg_value(
|
|||
};
|
||||
lints::unexpected_cfg_value::InvocationHelp::Cargo {
|
||||
help,
|
||||
macro_help: cargo_macro_help(name_span),
|
||||
macro_help: cargo_macro_help(tcx, name_span),
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
let help = if can_suggest_adding_value {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2187,8 +2187,7 @@ pub(crate) struct UnexpectedCfgRustcMacroHelp {
|
|||
pub(crate) struct UnexpectedCfgCargoMacroHelp {
|
||||
pub macro_kind: &'static str,
|
||||
pub macro_name: Symbol,
|
||||
// FIXME: Figure out a way to get the crate name
|
||||
// crate_name: String,
|
||||
pub crate_name: Symbol,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(LintDiagnostic)]
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ LL | cfg_macro::my_lib_macro!();
|
|||
= help: expected names are: `clippy`, `debug_assertions`, `doc`, `doctest`, `feature`, `fmt_debug`, `miri`, `overflow_checks`, `panic`, `proc_macro`, `relocation_model`, `rustfmt`, `sanitize`, `sanitizer_cfi_generalize_pointers`, `sanitizer_cfi_normalize_integers`, `target_abi`, `target_arch`, `target_endian`, `target_env`, `target_family`, `target_feature`, `target_has_atomic`, `target_has_atomic_equal_alignment`, `target_has_atomic_load_store`, `target_os`, `target_pointer_width`, `target_thread_local`, `target_vendor`, `test`, `ub_checks`, `unix`, and `windows`
|
||||
= note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
|
||||
= help: try refering to `cfg_macro::my_lib_macro` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
|
||||
= help: the macro `cfg_macro::my_lib_macro` may come from an old version of it's defining crate, try updating your dependencies with `cargo update`
|
||||
= help: the macro `cfg_macro::my_lib_macro` may come from an old version of the `cfg_macro` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p cfg_macro`
|
||||
= note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
|
||||
= note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default
|
||||
= note: this warning originates in the macro `cfg_macro::my_lib_macro` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
|
||||
|
@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ LL | cfg_macro::my_lib_macro_value!();
|
|||
= note: expected values for `panic` are: `abort` and `unwind`
|
||||
= note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
|
||||
= help: try refering to `cfg_macro::my_lib_macro_value` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
|
||||
= help: the macro `cfg_macro::my_lib_macro_value` may come from an old version of it's defining crate, try updating your dependencies with `cargo update`
|
||||
= help: the macro `cfg_macro::my_lib_macro_value` may come from an old version of the `cfg_macro` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p cfg_macro`
|
||||
= note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
|
||||
= note: this warning originates in the macro `cfg_macro::my_lib_macro_value` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ LL | cfg_macro::my_lib_macro_feature!();
|
|||
= note: no expected values for `feature`
|
||||
= note: using a cfg inside a macro will use the cfgs from the destination crate and not the ones from the defining crate
|
||||
= help: try refering to `cfg_macro::my_lib_macro_feature` crate for guidance on how handle this unexpected cfg
|
||||
= help: the macro `cfg_macro::my_lib_macro_feature` may come from an old version of it's defining crate, try updating your dependencies with `cargo update`
|
||||
= help: the macro `cfg_macro::my_lib_macro_feature` may come from an old version of the `cfg_macro` crate, try updating your dependency with `cargo update -p cfg_macro`
|
||||
= note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
|
||||
= note: this warning originates in the macro `cfg_macro::my_lib_macro_feature` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue