the wasm ABI behavior is a bug
This commit is contained in:
parent
243ef313a5
commit
28d152935e
3 changed files with 15 additions and 11 deletions
|
@ -36,7 +36,10 @@ pub enum PassMode {
|
|||
Ignore,
|
||||
/// Pass the argument directly.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The argument has a layout abi of `Scalar`, `Vector` or in rare cases (e.g. on wasm) `Aggregate`.
|
||||
/// The argument has a layout abi of `Scalar` or `Vector`.
|
||||
/// Unfortunately due to past mistakes, in rare cases on wasm, it can also be `Aggregate`.
|
||||
/// This is bad since it leaks LLVM implementation details into the ABI.
|
||||
/// (Also see <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115666>.)
|
||||
Direct(ArgAttributes),
|
||||
/// Pass a pair's elements directly in two arguments.
|
||||
///
|
||||
|
@ -527,7 +530,7 @@ impl<'a, Ty> ArgAbi<'a, Ty> {
|
|||
scalar_attrs(&layout, b, a.size(cx).align_to(b.align(cx).abi)),
|
||||
),
|
||||
Abi::Vector { .. } => PassMode::Direct(ArgAttributes::new()),
|
||||
// The `Aggregate` ABI is almost always adjusted later.
|
||||
// The `Aggregate` ABI should always be adjusted later.
|
||||
Abi::Aggregate { .. } => PassMode::Direct(ArgAttributes::new()),
|
||||
};
|
||||
ArgAbi { layout, mode }
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -61,6 +61,10 @@ where
|
|||
/// The purpose of this ABI is for matching the WebAssembly standard. This
|
||||
/// intentionally diverges from the C ABI and is specifically crafted to take
|
||||
/// advantage of LLVM's support of multiple returns in WebAssembly.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This ABI is *bad*! It uses `PassMode::Direct` for `abi::Aggregate` types, which leaks LLVM
|
||||
/// implementation details into the ABI. It's just hard to fix because ABIs are hard to change.
|
||||
/// Also see <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115666>.
|
||||
pub fn compute_wasm_abi_info<Ty>(fn_abi: &mut FnAbi<'_, Ty>) {
|
||||
if !fn_abi.ret.is_ignore() {
|
||||
classify_ret(&mut fn_abi.ret);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue