Auto merge of #85385 - richkadel:simpler-simplify-with-coverage, r=wesleywiser

Reland - Report coverage `0` of dead blocks

Fixes: #84018

With `-Z instrument-coverage`, coverage reporting of dead blocks
(for example, blocks dropped because a conditional branch is dropped,
based on const evaluation) is now supported.

Note, this PR relands an earlier, reverted PR that failed when compiling
generators. The prior issues with generators has been resolved and a new
test was added to prevent future regressions.

Check out the resulting changes to test coverage of dead blocks in the
test coverage reports in this PR.

r? `@tmandry`
fyi: `@wesleywiser`

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/coverageinfo/map.rs

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ pub struct Expression {
 /// only whitespace or comments). According to LLVM Code Coverage Mapping documentation, "A count
 /// for a gap area is only used as the line execution count if there are no other regions on a
 /// line."
+#[derive(Debug)]
 pub struct FunctionCoverage<'tcx> {
     instance: Instance<'tcx>,
     source_hash: u64,
@@ -113,6 +114,14 @@ impl<'tcx> FunctionCoverage<'tcx> {
             expression_id, lhs, op, rhs, region
         );
         let expression_index = self.expression_index(u32::from(expression_id));
+        debug_assert!(
+            expression_index.as_usize() < self.expressions.len(),
+            "expression_index {} is out of range for expressions.len() = {}
+            for {:?}",
+            expression_index.as_usize(),
+            self.expressions.len(),
+            self,
+        );
         if let Some(previous_expression) = self.expressions[expression_index].replace(Expression {
             lhs,
             op,