Replace parse_[sth]_expr with parse_expr_[sth] function names
This resolves an inconsistency in naming style for functions on the parser, between functions parsing specific kinds of items and those for expressions, favoring the parse_item_[sth] style used by functions for items. There are multiple advantages of that style: * functions of both categories are collected in the same place in the rustdoc output. * it helps with autocompletion, as you can narrow down your search for a function to those about expressions. * it mirrors rust's path syntax where less specific things come first, then it gets more specific, i.e. std::collections::hash_map::Entry The disadvantage is that it doesn't "read like a sentence" any more, but I think the advantages weigh more greatly. This change was mostly application of this command: sed -i -E 's/(fn |\.)parse_([[:alnum:]_]+)_expr/\1parse_expr_\2/' compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/*.rs Plus very minor fixes outside of rustc_parse, and an invocation of x fmt.
This commit is contained in:
parent
07c993eba8
commit
2850116636
7 changed files with 131 additions and 131 deletions
|
@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ pub fn parse_asm_args<'a>(
|
|||
ast::InlineAsmOperand::InOut { reg, expr, late: true }
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if p.eat_keyword(kw::Const) {
|
||||
let anon_const = p.parse_anon_const_expr()?;
|
||||
let anon_const = p.parse_expr_anon_const()?;
|
||||
ast::InlineAsmOperand::Const { anon_const }
|
||||
} else if p.eat_keyword(sym::sym) {
|
||||
let expr = p.parse_expr()?;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue