Changed unwrap_or to unwrap_or_else in some places.
The discussion seems to have resolved that this lint is a bit "noisy" in that applying it in all places would result in a reduction in readability. A few of the trivial functions (like `Path::new`) are fine to leave outside of closures. The general rule seems to be that anything that is obviously an allocation (`Box`, `Vec`, `vec![]`) should be in a closure, even if it is a 0-sized allocation.
This commit is contained in:
parent
38030ffb4e
commit
261ca04c92
14 changed files with 31 additions and 30 deletions
|
@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
self.check_member_constraints(infcx, &mut errors_buffer);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let outlives_requirements = outlives_requirements.unwrap_or(vec![]);
|
||||
let outlives_requirements = outlives_requirements.unwrap_or_default();
|
||||
|
||||
if outlives_requirements.is_empty() {
|
||||
(None, errors_buffer)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue