remove an unused DefId
This commit is contained in:
parent
a3beeaa84d
commit
24799e3720
11 changed files with 28 additions and 74 deletions
|
@ -317,14 +317,13 @@ fn negative_impl<'cx, 'tcx>(
|
|||
let (subject2, obligations) =
|
||||
impl_subject_and_oblig(selcx, impl_env, impl2_def_id, impl2_substs);
|
||||
|
||||
!equate(&infcx, impl_env, impl1_def_id, subject1, subject2, obligations)
|
||||
!equate(&infcx, impl_env, subject1, subject2, obligations)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn equate<'cx, 'tcx>(
|
||||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'cx, 'tcx>,
|
||||
impl_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
impl1_def_id: DefId,
|
||||
subject1: ImplSubject<'tcx>,
|
||||
subject2: ImplSubject<'tcx>,
|
||||
obligations: impl Iterator<Item = PredicateObligation<'tcx>>,
|
||||
|
@ -341,7 +340,7 @@ fn equate<'cx, 'tcx>(
|
|||
let opt_failing_obligation = obligations
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.chain(more_obligations)
|
||||
.find(|o| negative_impl_exists(selcx, impl_env, impl1_def_id, o));
|
||||
.find(|o| negative_impl_exists(selcx, impl_env, o));
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(failing_obligation) = opt_failing_obligation {
|
||||
debug!("overlap: obligation unsatisfiable {:?}", failing_obligation);
|
||||
|
@ -356,18 +355,17 @@ fn equate<'cx, 'tcx>(
|
|||
fn negative_impl_exists<'cx, 'tcx>(
|
||||
selcx: &SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx>,
|
||||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
region_context: DefId,
|
||||
o: &PredicateObligation<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> bool {
|
||||
let infcx = &selcx.infcx().fork();
|
||||
|
||||
if resolve_negative_obligation(infcx, param_env, region_context, o) {
|
||||
if resolve_negative_obligation(infcx, param_env, o) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Try to prove a negative obligation exists for super predicates
|
||||
for o in util::elaborate_predicates(infcx.tcx, iter::once(o.predicate)) {
|
||||
if resolve_negative_obligation(infcx, param_env, region_context, &o) {
|
||||
if resolve_negative_obligation(infcx, param_env, &o) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -379,7 +377,6 @@ fn negative_impl_exists<'cx, 'tcx>(
|
|||
fn resolve_negative_obligation<'cx, 'tcx>(
|
||||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'cx, 'tcx>,
|
||||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
region_context: DefId,
|
||||
o: &PredicateObligation<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> bool {
|
||||
let tcx = infcx.tcx;
|
||||
|
@ -409,7 +406,7 @@ fn resolve_negative_obligation<'cx, 'tcx>(
|
|||
|
||||
infcx.process_registered_region_obligations(outlives_env.region_bound_pairs_map(), param_env);
|
||||
|
||||
let errors = infcx.resolve_regions(region_context, &outlives_env);
|
||||
let errors = infcx.resolve_regions(&outlives_env);
|
||||
|
||||
if !errors.is_empty() {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -198,17 +198,13 @@ pub fn type_known_to_meet_bound_modulo_regions<'a, 'tcx>(
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(tcx, elaborated_env))]
|
||||
fn do_normalize_predicates<'tcx>(
|
||||
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
region_context: DefId,
|
||||
cause: ObligationCause<'tcx>,
|
||||
elaborated_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
predicates: Vec<ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
) -> Result<Vec<ty::Predicate<'tcx>>, ErrorGuaranteed> {
|
||||
debug!(
|
||||
"do_normalize_predicates(predicates={:?}, region_context={:?}, cause={:?})",
|
||||
predicates, region_context, cause,
|
||||
);
|
||||
let span = cause.span;
|
||||
tcx.infer_ctxt().enter(|infcx| {
|
||||
// FIXME. We should really... do something with these region
|
||||
|
@ -240,7 +236,7 @@ fn do_normalize_predicates<'tcx>(
|
|||
// cares about declarations like `'a: 'b`.
|
||||
let outlives_env = OutlivesEnvironment::new(elaborated_env);
|
||||
|
||||
infcx.resolve_regions_and_report_errors(region_context, &outlives_env);
|
||||
infcx.resolve_regions_and_report_errors(&outlives_env);
|
||||
|
||||
let predicates = match infcx.fully_resolve(predicates) {
|
||||
Ok(predicates) => predicates,
|
||||
|
@ -269,9 +265,9 @@ fn do_normalize_predicates<'tcx>(
|
|||
|
||||
// FIXME: this is gonna need to be removed ...
|
||||
/// Normalizes the parameter environment, reporting errors if they occur.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(tcx))]
|
||||
pub fn normalize_param_env_or_error<'tcx>(
|
||||
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
region_context: DefId,
|
||||
unnormalized_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
cause: ObligationCause<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> ty::ParamEnv<'tcx> {
|
||||
|
@ -289,12 +285,6 @@ pub fn normalize_param_env_or_error<'tcx>(
|
|||
// parameter environments once for every fn as it goes,
|
||||
// and errors will get reported then; so outside of type inference we
|
||||
// can be sure that no errors should occur.
|
||||
|
||||
debug!(
|
||||
"normalize_param_env_or_error(region_context={:?}, unnormalized_env={:?}, cause={:?})",
|
||||
region_context, unnormalized_env, cause
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut predicates: Vec<_> =
|
||||
util::elaborate_predicates(tcx, unnormalized_env.caller_bounds().into_iter())
|
||||
.map(|obligation| obligation.predicate)
|
||||
|
@ -338,7 +328,6 @@ pub fn normalize_param_env_or_error<'tcx>(
|
|||
);
|
||||
let Ok(non_outlives_predicates) = do_normalize_predicates(
|
||||
tcx,
|
||||
region_context,
|
||||
cause.clone(),
|
||||
elaborated_env,
|
||||
predicates,
|
||||
|
@ -362,7 +351,6 @@ pub fn normalize_param_env_or_error<'tcx>(
|
|||
);
|
||||
let Ok(outlives_predicates) = do_normalize_predicates(
|
||||
tcx,
|
||||
region_context,
|
||||
cause,
|
||||
outlives_env,
|
||||
outlives_predicates,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue