1
Fork 0

Rollup merge of #111486 - fmease:pp-inh-proj, r=petrochenkov

Pretty-print inherent projections correctly

Previously, we were trying to pretty-print inherent projections with `Printer::print_def_path` which is incorrect since
it expects the substitutions to be of a certain format (parents substs followed by own substs) which doesn't hold for
inherent projections (self type subst followed by own substs).
Now we print inherent projections manually.

Fixes #111390.
Fixes #111397.

Lacking tests! Is there a test suite / compiletest flags for the pretty-printer? In most if not all cases,
inherent projections are normalized away before they get the chance to appear in diagnostics.

If I were to create regression tests for linked issues, they would need to be `mir-opt` tests to exercise
`-Zdump-mir=all` (right?) which doesn't feel quite adequate to me.

`@rustbot` label F-inherent_associated_types
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Krüger 2023-05-23 19:53:41 +02:00 committed by GitHub
commit 221039b416
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
4 changed files with 28 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -1164,6 +1164,22 @@ pub trait PrettyPrinter<'tcx>:
traits.entry(trait_ref).or_default().extend(proj_ty);
}
fn pretty_print_inherent_projection(
self,
alias_ty: &ty::AliasTy<'tcx>,
) -> Result<Self::Path, Self::Error> {
let def_key = self.tcx().def_key(alias_ty.def_id);
self.path_generic_args(
|cx| {
cx.path_append(
|cx| cx.path_qualified(alias_ty.self_ty(), None),
&def_key.disambiguated_data,
)
},
&alias_ty.substs[1..],
)
}
fn ty_infer_name(&self, _: ty::TyVid) -> Option<Symbol> {
None
}
@ -2821,7 +2837,11 @@ define_print_and_forward_display! {
}
ty::AliasTy<'tcx> {
p!(print_def_path(self.def_id, self.substs));
if let DefKind::Impl { of_trait: false } = cx.tcx().def_kind(cx.tcx().parent(self.def_id)) {
p!(pretty_print_inherent_projection(self))
} else {
p!(print_def_path(self.def_id, self.substs));
}
}
ty::ClosureKind {