bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Activity

Auto merge of #104844 - cjgillot:mention-eval-place, r=jackh726,RalfJung

Browse source 
Evaluate place expression in `PlaceMention`

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102256 introduces a `PlaceMention(place)` MIR statement which keep trace of `let _ = place` statements from surface rust, but without semantics.

This PR proposes to change the behaviour of `let _ =` patterns with respect to the borrow-checker to verify that the bound place is live.

Specifically, consider this code:
```rust
let _ = {
    let a = 5;
    &a
};
```

This passes borrowck without error on stable. Meanwhile, replacing `_` by `_: _` or `_p` errors with "error[E0597]: `a` does not live long enough", [see playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=c448d25a7c205dc95a0967fe96bccce8).

This PR *does not* change how `_` patterns behave with respect to initializedness: it remains ok to bind a moved-from place to `_`.

The relevant test is `tests/ui/borrowck/let_underscore_temporary.rs`. Crater check found no regression.

For consistency, this PR changes miri to evaluate the place found in `PlaceMention`, and report eventual dangling pointers found within it.

r? `@RalfJung`
This commit is contained in:
bors 2023-04-22 09:54:21 +00:00
commit 21fab435da
22 changed files with 201 additions and 39 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

1
compiler/rustc_interface/src/tests.rs
View file

@ -768,6 +768,7 @@ fn test_unstable_options_tracking_hash() {
tracked!(merge_functions, Some(MergeFunctions::Disabled));
tracked!(mir_emit_retag, true);
tracked!(mir_enable_passes, vec![("DestProp".to_string(), false)]);
tracked!(mir_keep_place_mention, true);
tracked!(mir_opt_level, Some(4));
tracked!(move_size_limit, Some(4096));
tracked!(mutable_noalias, false);