Rollup merge of #130350 - RalfJung:strict-provenance, r=dtolnay
stabilize Strict Provenance and Exposed Provenance APIs Given that [RFC 3559](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3559-rust-has-provenance.html) has been accepted, t-lang has approved the concept of provenance to exist in the language. So I think it's time that we stabilize the strict provenance and exposed provenance APIs, and discuss provenance explicitly in the docs: ```rust // core::ptr pub const fn without_provenance<T>(addr: usize) -> *const T; pub const fn dangling<T>() -> *const T; pub const fn without_provenance_mut<T>(addr: usize) -> *mut T; pub const fn dangling_mut<T>() -> *mut T; pub fn with_exposed_provenance<T>(addr: usize) -> *const T; pub fn with_exposed_provenance_mut<T>(addr: usize) -> *mut T; impl<T: ?Sized> *const T { pub fn addr(self) -> usize; pub fn expose_provenance(self) -> usize; pub fn with_addr(self, addr: usize) -> Self; pub fn map_addr(self, f: impl FnOnce(usize) -> usize) -> Self; } impl<T: ?Sized> *mut T { pub fn addr(self) -> usize; pub fn expose_provenance(self) -> usize; pub fn with_addr(self, addr: usize) -> Self; pub fn map_addr(self, f: impl FnOnce(usize) -> usize) -> Self; } impl<T: ?Sized> NonNull<T> { pub fn addr(self) -> NonZero<usize>; pub fn with_addr(self, addr: NonZero<usize>) -> Self; pub fn map_addr(self, f: impl FnOnce(NonZero<usize>) -> NonZero<usize>) -> Self; } ``` I also did a pass over the docs to adjust them, because this is no longer an "experiment". The `ptr` docs now discuss the concept of provenance in general, and then they go into the two families of APIs for dealing with provenance: Strict Provenance and Exposed Provenance. I removed the discussion of how pointers also have an associated "address space" -- that is not actually tracked in the pointer value, it is tracked in the type, so IMO it just distracts from the core point of provenance. I also adjusted the docs for `with_exposed_provenance` to make it clear that we cannot guarantee much about this function, it's all best-effort. There are two unstable lints associated with the strict_provenance feature gate; I moved them to a new [strict_provenance_lints](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130351) feature since I didn't want this PR to have an even bigger FCP. ;) `@rust-lang/opsem` Would be great to get some feedback on the docs here. :) Nominating for `@rust-lang/libs-api.` Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95228. [FCP comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/130350#issuecomment-2395114536)
This commit is contained in:
commit
20b1dadf92
90 changed files with 363 additions and 525 deletions
|
@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
|
|||
#![feature(let_chains)]
|
||||
#![feature(negative_impls)]
|
||||
#![feature(rustdoc_internals)]
|
||||
#![feature(strict_provenance)]
|
||||
#![feature(trait_alias)]
|
||||
#![feature(try_blocks)]
|
||||
#![warn(unreachable_pub)]
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -361,12 +361,16 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>> FunctionCx<'a, 'tcx, Bx> {
|
|||
(Int(..) | Float(_), Int(..) | Float(_)) => bx.bitcast(imm, to_backend_ty),
|
||||
(Pointer(..), Pointer(..)) => bx.pointercast(imm, to_backend_ty),
|
||||
(Int(..), Pointer(..)) => bx.ptradd(bx.const_null(bx.type_ptr()), imm),
|
||||
(Pointer(..), Int(..)) => bx.ptrtoint(imm, to_backend_ty),
|
||||
(Pointer(..), Int(..)) => {
|
||||
// FIXME: this exposes the provenance, which shouldn't be necessary.
|
||||
bx.ptrtoint(imm, to_backend_ty)
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Float(_), Pointer(..)) => {
|
||||
let int_imm = bx.bitcast(imm, bx.cx().type_isize());
|
||||
bx.ptradd(bx.const_null(bx.type_ptr()), int_imm)
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Pointer(..), Float(_)) => {
|
||||
// FIXME: this exposes the provenance, which shouldn't be necessary.
|
||||
let int_imm = bx.ptrtoint(imm, bx.cx().type_isize());
|
||||
bx.bitcast(int_imm, to_backend_ty)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue