rustc_typeck to rustc_hir_analysis

compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/thir/cx/expr.rs

@@ -998,7 +998,7 @@ impl<'tcx> Cx<'tcx> {
             .temporary_scope(self.region_scope_tree, closure_expr.hir_id.local_id);
         let var_ty = place.base_ty;
 
-        // The result of capture analysis in `rustc_typeck/check/upvar.rs`represents a captured path
+        // The result of capture analysis in `rustc_hir_analysis/check/upvar.rs`represents a captured path
         // as it's seen for use within the closure and not at the time of closure creation.
         //
         // That is we see expect to see it start from a captured upvar and not something that is local

compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/thir/pattern/mod.rs

@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> PatCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
         // ```
         //
         // the type assigned to `Some(n)` in `unadjusted_pat` would be `Option<i32>` (this is
-        // determined in rustc_typeck::check::match). The adjustments would be
+        // determined in rustc_hir_analysis::check::match). The adjustments would be
         //
         // `vec![&&Option<i32>, &Option<i32>]`.
         //

compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/thir/pattern/usefulness.rs

@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ impl<'p, 'tcx> Witness<'p, 'tcx> {
 /// Report that a match of a `non_exhaustive` enum marked with `non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns`
 /// is not exhaustive enough.
 ///
-/// NB: The partner lint for structs lives in `compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/pat.rs`.
+/// NB: The partner lint for structs lives in `compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/pat.rs`.
 fn lint_non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns<'p, 'tcx>(
     cx: &MatchCheckCtxt<'p, 'tcx>,
     scrut_ty: Ty<'tcx>,