Rollup merge of #122487 - GuillaumeGomez:rename-stmtkind-local, r=oli-obk
Rename `StmtKind::Local` variant into `StmtKind::Let` It comes from this [discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Improve.20naming.20of.20.60ExprKind.3A.3ALet.60.3F). Starting point was: > I often end up looking at [ExprKind::Let](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir/enum.ExprKind.html#variant.Let) instead of Local because of the name. I think renaming it (both the `ExprKind` variant and the Let struct) to `LetPattern` or LetPat could improve the situation as I'm not sure I'm not the only one encountering this issue. And then it evolved into: > It's already `Expr::Let` instead of `StmtKind::Local`. Counterproposal: rename `StmtKind::Local` to `StmtKind::Let`. The goal here is to clear this confusion. r? `@oli-obk`
This commit is contained in:
commit
1f4aff7d2b
74 changed files with 103 additions and 103 deletions
|
@ -864,7 +864,7 @@ impl<'a> State<'a> {
|
|||
fn print_stmt(&mut self, st: &hir::Stmt<'_>) {
|
||||
self.maybe_print_comment(st.span.lo());
|
||||
match st.kind {
|
||||
hir::StmtKind::Local(loc) => {
|
||||
hir::StmtKind::Let(loc) => {
|
||||
self.print_local(loc.init, loc.els, |this| this.print_local_decl(loc));
|
||||
}
|
||||
hir::StmtKind::Item(item) => self.ann.nested(self, Nested::Item(item)),
|
||||
|
@ -2307,7 +2307,7 @@ fn expr_requires_semi_to_be_stmt(e: &hir::Expr<'_>) -> bool {
|
|||
/// seen the semicolon, and thus don't need another.
|
||||
fn stmt_ends_with_semi(stmt: &hir::StmtKind<'_>) -> bool {
|
||||
match *stmt {
|
||||
hir::StmtKind::Local(_) => true,
|
||||
hir::StmtKind::Let(_) => true,
|
||||
hir::StmtKind::Item(_) => false,
|
||||
hir::StmtKind::Expr(e) => expr_requires_semi_to_be_stmt(e),
|
||||
hir::StmtKind::Semi(..) => false,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue