Rollup merge of #122487 - GuillaumeGomez:rename-stmtkind-local, r=oli-obk

Rename `StmtKind::Local` variant into `StmtKind::Let`

It comes from this [discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Improve.20naming.20of.20.60ExprKind.3A.3ALet.60.3F).

Starting point was:

> I often end up looking at [ExprKind::Let](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir/enum.ExprKind.html#variant.Let) instead of Local because of the name. I think renaming it (both the `ExprKind` variant and the Let struct) to `LetPattern` or LetPat could improve the situation as I'm not sure I'm not the only one encountering this issue.

And then it evolved into:

> It's already `Expr::Let` instead of `StmtKind::Local`. Counterproposal: rename `StmtKind::Local` to `StmtKind::Let`.

The goal here is to clear this confusion.

r? `@oli-obk`

compiler/rustc_hir/src/hir.rs

@@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ pub struct Stmt<'hir> {
 #[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, HashStable_Generic)]
 pub enum StmtKind<'hir> {
     /// A local (`let`) binding.
-    Local(&'hir Local<'hir>),
+    Let(&'hir Local<'hir>),
 
     /// An item binding.
     Item(ItemId),

compiler/rustc_hir/src/intravisit.rs

@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ pub fn walk_block<'v, V: Visitor<'v>>(visitor: &mut V, block: &'v Block<'v>) ->
 pub fn walk_stmt<'v, V: Visitor<'v>>(visitor: &mut V, statement: &'v Stmt<'v>) -> V::Result {
     try_visit!(visitor.visit_id(statement.hir_id));
     match statement.kind {
-        StmtKind::Local(ref local) => visitor.visit_local(local),
+        StmtKind::Let(ref local) => visitor.visit_local(local),
         StmtKind::Item(item) => visitor.visit_nested_item(item),
         StmtKind::Expr(ref expression) | StmtKind::Semi(ref expression) => {
             visitor.visit_expr(expression)