Avoid splitting up a layout

This commit is contained in:
Oli Scherer 2025-03-18 16:44:04 +00:00
parent 018032c682
commit 1f34b19596
3 changed files with 24 additions and 22 deletions

View file

@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ fn build_pointer_or_reference_di_node<'ll, 'tcx>(
cx,
owner,
addr_field_name,
(addr_field.size, addr_field.align.abi),
addr_field,
layout.fields.offset(WIDE_PTR_ADDR),
DIFlags::FlagZero,
data_ptr_type_di_node,
@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ fn build_pointer_or_reference_di_node<'ll, 'tcx>(
cx,
owner,
extra_field_name,
(extra_field.size, extra_field.align.abi),
extra_field,
layout.fields.offset(WIDE_PTR_EXTRA),
DIFlags::FlagZero,
type_di_node(cx, extra_field.ty),
@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ fn build_cpp_f16_di_node<'ll, 'tcx>(cx: &CodegenCx<'ll, 'tcx>) -> DINodeCreation
cx,
float_di_node,
"bits",
cx.size_and_align_of(bits_ty),
cx.layout_of(bits_ty),
Size::ZERO,
DIFlags::FlagZero,
type_di_node(cx, bits_ty),
@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ fn build_field_di_node<'ll, 'tcx>(
cx: &CodegenCx<'ll, 'tcx>,
owner: &'ll DIScope,
name: &str,
size_and_align: (Size, Align),
layout: TyAndLayout<'tcx>,
offset: Size,
flags: DIFlags,
type_di_node: &'ll DIType,
@ -992,8 +992,8 @@ fn build_field_di_node<'ll, 'tcx>(
name.len(),
file_metadata,
line_number,
size_and_align.0.bits(),
size_and_align.1.bits() as u32,
layout.size.bits(),
layout.align.abi.bits() as u32,
offset.bits(),
flags,
type_di_node,
@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ fn build_struct_type_di_node<'ll, 'tcx>(
cx,
owner,
&field_name[..],
(field_layout.size, field_layout.align.abi),
field_layout,
struct_type_and_layout.fields.offset(i),
visibility_di_flags(cx, f.did, adt_def.did()),
type_di_node(cx, field_layout.ty),
@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ fn build_upvar_field_di_nodes<'ll, 'tcx>(
cx,
closure_or_coroutine_di_node,
capture_name.as_str(),
cx.size_and_align_of(up_var_ty),
cx.layout_of(up_var_ty),
layout.fields.offset(index),
DIFlags::FlagZero,
type_di_node(cx, up_var_ty),
@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ fn build_tuple_type_di_node<'ll, 'tcx>(
cx,
tuple_di_node,
&tuple_field_name(index),
cx.size_and_align_of(component_type),
cx.layout_of(component_type),
tuple_type_and_layout.fields.offset(index),
DIFlags::FlagZero,
type_di_node(cx, component_type),
@ -1270,7 +1270,7 @@ fn build_union_type_di_node<'ll, 'tcx>(
cx,
owner,
f.name.as_str(),
size_and_align_of(field_layout),
field_layout,
Size::ZERO,
DIFlags::FlagZero,
type_di_node(cx, field_layout.ty),
@ -1418,7 +1418,9 @@ fn build_vtable_type_di_node<'ll, 'tcx>(
let void_pointer_ty = Ty::new_imm_ptr(tcx, tcx.types.unit);
let void_pointer_type_di_node = type_di_node(cx, void_pointer_ty);
let usize_di_node = type_di_node(cx, tcx.types.usize);
let (pointer_size, pointer_align) = cx.size_and_align_of(void_pointer_ty);
let pointer_layout = cx.layout_of(void_pointer_ty);
let pointer_size = pointer_layout.size;
let pointer_align = pointer_layout.align.abi;
// If `usize` is not pointer-sized and -aligned then the size and alignment computations
// for the vtable as a whole would be wrong. Let's make sure this holds even on weird
// platforms.
@ -1474,7 +1476,7 @@ fn build_vtable_type_di_node<'ll, 'tcx>(
cx,
vtable_type_di_node,
&field_name,
(pointer_size, pointer_align),
pointer_layout,
field_offset,
DIFlags::FlagZero,
field_type_di_node,

View file

@ -370,9 +370,9 @@ fn build_single_variant_union_fields<'ll, 'tcx>(
cx,
enum_type_di_node,
&variant_union_field_name(variant_index),
// NOTE: We use the size and align of the entire type, not from variant_layout
// NOTE: We use the layout of the entire type, not from variant_layout
// since the later is sometimes smaller (if it has fewer fields).
size_and_align_of(enum_type_and_layout),
enum_type_and_layout,
Size::ZERO,
visibility_flags,
variant_struct_type_wrapper_di_node,
@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ fn build_variant_struct_wrapper_type_di_node<'ll, 'tcx>(
cx,
wrapper_struct_type_di_node,
"value",
size_and_align_of(enum_or_coroutine_type_and_layout),
enum_or_coroutine_type_and_layout,
Size::ZERO,
DIFlags::FlagZero,
variant_struct_type_di_node,
@ -874,7 +874,7 @@ fn build_union_fields_for_direct_tag_enum_or_coroutine<'ll, 'tcx>(
if is_128_bits {
let type_di_node = type_di_node(cx, cx.tcx.types.u64);
let size_and_align = cx.size_and_align_of(cx.tcx.types.u64);
let u64_layout = cx.layout_of(cx.tcx.types.u64);
let (lo_offset, hi_offset) = match cx.tcx.data_layout.endian {
Endian::Little => (0, 8),
@ -889,7 +889,7 @@ fn build_union_fields_for_direct_tag_enum_or_coroutine<'ll, 'tcx>(
cx,
enum_type_di_node,
TAG_FIELD_NAME_128_LO,
size_and_align,
u64_layout,
lo_offset,
di_flags,
type_di_node,
@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ fn build_union_fields_for_direct_tag_enum_or_coroutine<'ll, 'tcx>(
cx,
enum_type_di_node,
TAG_FIELD_NAME_128_HI,
size_and_align,
u64_layout,
hi_offset,
DIFlags::FlagZero,
type_di_node,
@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ fn build_union_fields_for_direct_tag_enum_or_coroutine<'ll, 'tcx>(
cx,
enum_type_di_node,
TAG_FIELD_NAME,
cx.size_and_align_of(enum_type_and_layout.field(cx, tag_field).ty),
enum_type_and_layout.field(cx, tag_field),
enum_type_and_layout.fields.offset(tag_field),
di_flags,
tag_base_type_di_node,

View file

@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ fn build_enum_variant_struct_type_di_node<'ll, 'tcx>(
cx,
struct_type_di_node,
&field_name,
(field_layout.size, field_layout.align.abi),
field_layout,
variant_layout.fields.offset(field_index),
di_flags,
type_di_node(cx, field_layout.ty),
@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ fn build_coroutine_variant_struct_type_di_node<'ll, 'tcx>(
cx,
variant_struct_type_di_node,
&field_name,
cx.size_and_align_of(field_type),
cx.layout_of(field_type),
variant_layout.fields.offset(field_index),
DIFlags::FlagZero,
type_di_node(cx, field_type),
@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ fn build_coroutine_variant_struct_type_di_node<'ll, 'tcx>(
cx,
variant_struct_type_di_node,
upvar_name.as_str(),
cx.size_and_align_of(upvar_ty),
cx.layout_of(upvar_ty),
coroutine_type_and_layout.fields.offset(index),
DIFlags::FlagZero,
type_di_node(cx, upvar_ty),