bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Activity

lint: add comment about diag lints in group

Browse source 
Add a brief comment explaining why the diagnostic migration lints aren't
included in the `rustc::internal` diagnostic group.

Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
This commit is contained in:
David Wood 2022-07-26 11:46:01 +01:00
parent e33cc71a61
commit 1b8e4b9391
1 changed files with 4 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
compiler/rustc_lint/src/lib.rs
View file

@ -511,6 +511,10 @@ fn register_internals(store: &mut LintStore) {
store.register_late_pass(|| Box::new(Diagnostics)); store.register_late_pass(|| Box::new(Diagnostics));
store.register_lints(&PassByValue::get_lints()); store.register_lints(&PassByValue::get_lints());
store.register_late_pass(|| Box::new(PassByValue)); store.register_late_pass(|| Box::new(PassByValue));
// FIXME(davidtwco): deliberately do not include `UNTRANSLATABLE_DIAGNOSTIC` and
// `DIAGNOSTIC_OUTSIDE_OF_IMPL` here because `-Wrustc::internal` is provided to every crate and
// these lints will trigger all of the time - change this once migration to diagnostic structs
// and translation is completed
store.register_group( store.register_group(
false, false,
"rustc::internal", "rustc::internal",