properly fill a promoted's required_consts
then we can also make all_required_consts_are_checked a constant instead of a function
This commit is contained in:
parent
bf021ea625
commit
173d1bd36b
13 changed files with 121 additions and 54 deletions
|
@ -46,11 +46,8 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir> interpret::Machine<'mir, 'tcx> for DummyMachine {
|
|||
type MemoryKind = !;
|
||||
const PANIC_ON_ALLOC_FAIL: bool = true;
|
||||
|
||||
#[inline(always)]
|
||||
fn all_required_consts_are_checked(_ecx: &InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, Self>) -> bool {
|
||||
// We want to just eval random consts in the program, so `eval_mir_const` can fail.
|
||||
false
|
||||
}
|
||||
// We want to just eval random consts in the program, so `eval_mir_const` can fail.
|
||||
const ALL_CONSTS_ARE_PRECHECKED: bool = false;
|
||||
|
||||
#[inline(always)]
|
||||
fn enforce_alignment(_ecx: &InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, Self>) -> bool {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -375,20 +375,6 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx> interpret::Machine<'mir, 'tcx> for CompileTimeInterpreter<'mir,
|
|||
|
||||
const PANIC_ON_ALLOC_FAIL: bool = false; // will be raised as a proper error
|
||||
|
||||
#[inline]
|
||||
fn all_required_consts_are_checked(ecx: &InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, Self>) -> bool {
|
||||
// Generally we expect required_consts to be properly filled, except for promoteds where
|
||||
// storing these consts shows up negatively in benchmarks. A promoted can only be relevant
|
||||
// if its parent MIR is relevant, and the consts in the promoted will be in the parent's
|
||||
// `required_consts`, so we are still sure to catch any const-eval bugs, just a bit less
|
||||
// directly.
|
||||
if ecx.frame_idx() == 0 && ecx.frame().body.source.promoted.is_some() {
|
||||
false
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
true
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[inline(always)]
|
||||
fn enforce_alignment(ecx: &InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, Self>) -> bool {
|
||||
matches!(ecx.machine.check_alignment, CheckAlignment::Error)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1179,9 +1179,7 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
|
|||
) -> InterpResult<'tcx, OpTy<'tcx, M::Provenance>> {
|
||||
M::eval_mir_constant(self, *val, span, layout, |ecx, val, span, layout| {
|
||||
let const_val = val.eval(*ecx.tcx, ecx.param_env, span).map_err(|err| {
|
||||
if M::all_required_consts_are_checked(self)
|
||||
&& !matches!(err, ErrorHandled::TooGeneric(..))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if M::ALL_CONSTS_ARE_PRECHECKED && !matches!(err, ErrorHandled::TooGeneric(..)) {
|
||||
// Looks like the const is not captued by `required_consts`, that's bad.
|
||||
bug!("interpret const eval failure of {val:?} which is not in required_consts");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ pub trait Machine<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir>: Sized {
|
|||
|
||||
/// Determines whether `eval_mir_constant` can never fail because all required consts have
|
||||
/// already been checked before.
|
||||
fn all_required_consts_are_checked(ecx: &InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, Self>) -> bool;
|
||||
const ALL_CONSTS_ARE_PRECHECKED: bool = true;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Whether memory accesses should be alignment-checked.
|
||||
fn enforce_alignment(ecx: &InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, Self>) -> bool;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue