Rollup merge of #95808 - petrochenkov:fragspec, r=nnethercote

expand: Remove `ParseSess::missing_fragment_specifiers`

It was used for deduplicating some errors for legacy code which are mostly deduplicated even without that, but at cost of global mutable state, which is not a good tradeoff.

cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95747#issuecomment-1091619403
r? ``@nnethercote``
This commit is contained in:
Dylan DPC 2022-04-09 18:26:28 +02:00 committed by GitHub
commit 17157c717e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
13 changed files with 138 additions and 48 deletions

View file

@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ use rustc_ast::token::{DelimToken, Token, TokenKind};
use rustc_ast::{NodeId, DUMMY_NODE_ID};
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashMap;
use rustc_errors::MultiSpan;
use rustc_session::lint::builtin::META_VARIABLE_MISUSE;
use rustc_session::lint::builtin::{META_VARIABLE_MISUSE, MISSING_FRAGMENT_SPECIFIER};
use rustc_session::parse::ParseSess;
use rustc_span::symbol::kw;
use rustc_span::{symbol::MacroRulesNormalizedIdent, Span};
@ -261,7 +261,18 @@ fn check_binders(
}
}
// Similarly, this can only happen when checking a toplevel macro.
TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(span, name, _kind) => {
TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(span, name, kind) => {
if kind.is_none() && node_id != DUMMY_NODE_ID {
// FIXME: Report this as a hard error eventually and remove equivalent errors from
// `parse_tt_inner` and `nameize`. Until then the error may be reported twice, once
// as a hard error and then once as a buffered lint.
sess.buffer_lint(
MISSING_FRAGMENT_SPECIFIER,
span,
node_id,
&format!("missing fragment specifier"),
);
}
if !macros.is_empty() {
sess.span_diagnostic.span_bug(span, "unexpected MetaVarDecl in nested lhs");
}

View file

@ -411,7 +411,6 @@ impl TtParser {
/// track of through the mps generated.
fn parse_tt_inner(
&mut self,
sess: &ParseSess,
matcher: &[MatcherLoc],
token: &Token,
) -> Option<NamedParseResult> {
@ -519,13 +518,11 @@ impl TtParser {
self.bb_mps.push(mp);
}
} else {
// E.g. `$e` instead of `$e:expr`, reported as a hard error if actually used.
// Both this check and the one in `nameize` are necessary, surprisingly.
if sess.missing_fragment_specifiers.borrow_mut().remove(&span).is_some() {
// E.g. `$e` instead of `$e:expr`.
return Some(Error(span, "missing fragment specifier".to_string()));
}
}
}
MatcherLoc::Eof => {
// We are past the matcher's end, and not in a sequence. Try to end things.
debug_assert_eq!(mp.idx, matcher.len() - 1);
@ -549,7 +546,7 @@ impl TtParser {
// Need to take ownership of the matches from within the `Lrc`.
Lrc::make_mut(&mut eof_mp.matches);
let matches = Lrc::try_unwrap(eof_mp.matches).unwrap().into_iter();
self.nameize(sess, matcher, matches)
self.nameize(matcher, matches)
}
EofMatcherPositions::Multiple => {
Error(token.span, "ambiguity: multiple successful parses".to_string())
@ -587,7 +584,7 @@ impl TtParser {
// Process `cur_mps` until either we have finished the input or we need to get some
// parsing from the black-box parser done.
if let Some(res) = self.parse_tt_inner(&parser.sess, matcher, &parser.token) {
if let Some(res) = self.parse_tt_inner(matcher, &parser.token) {
return res;
}
@ -694,7 +691,6 @@ impl TtParser {
fn nameize<I: Iterator<Item = NamedMatch>>(
&self,
sess: &ParseSess,
matcher: &[MatcherLoc],
mut res: I,
) -> NamedParseResult {
@ -711,14 +707,12 @@ impl TtParser {
}
};
} else {
// E.g. `$e` instead of `$e:expr`, reported as a hard error if actually used.
// Both this check and the one in `parse_tt_inner` are necessary, surprisingly.
if sess.missing_fragment_specifiers.borrow_mut().remove(&span).is_some() {
// E.g. `$e` instead of `$e:expr`.
return Error(span, "missing fragment specifier".to_string());
}
}
}
}
Success(ret_val)
}
}

View file

@ -2,8 +2,7 @@ use crate::mbe::macro_parser::count_metavar_decls;
use crate::mbe::{Delimited, KleeneOp, KleeneToken, MetaVarExpr, SequenceRepetition, TokenTree};
use rustc_ast::token::{self, Token};
use rustc_ast::tokenstream;
use rustc_ast::{NodeId, DUMMY_NODE_ID};
use rustc_ast::{tokenstream, NodeId};
use rustc_ast_pretty::pprust;
use rustc_feature::Features;
use rustc_session::parse::{feature_err, ParseSess};
@ -104,10 +103,7 @@ pub(super) fn parse(
}
tree => tree.as_ref().map_or(start_sp, tokenstream::TokenTree::span),
};
if node_id != DUMMY_NODE_ID {
// Macros loaded from other crates have dummy node ids.
sess.missing_fragment_specifiers.borrow_mut().insert(span, node_id);
}
result.push(TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(span, ident, None));
}

View file

@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ use rustc_resolve::{Resolver, ResolverArenas};
use rustc_serialize::json;
use rustc_session::config::{CrateType, Input, OutputFilenames, OutputType};
use rustc_session::cstore::{MetadataLoader, MetadataLoaderDyn};
use rustc_session::lint;
use rustc_session::output::{filename_for_input, filename_for_metadata};
use rustc_session::search_paths::PathKind;
use rustc_session::{Limit, Session};
@ -349,23 +348,8 @@ pub fn configure_and_expand(
ecx.check_unused_macros();
});
let mut missing_fragment_specifiers: Vec<_> = ecx
.sess
.parse_sess
.missing_fragment_specifiers
.borrow()
.iter()
.map(|(span, node_id)| (*span, *node_id))
.collect();
missing_fragment_specifiers.sort_unstable_by_key(|(span, _)| *span);
let recursion_limit_hit = ecx.reduced_recursion_limit.is_some();
for (span, node_id) in missing_fragment_specifiers {
let lint = lint::builtin::MISSING_FRAGMENT_SPECIFIER;
let msg = "missing fragment specifier";
resolver.lint_buffer().buffer_lint(lint, node_id, span, msg);
}
if cfg!(windows) {
env::set_var("PATH", &old_path);
}

View file

@ -140,7 +140,6 @@ pub struct ParseSess {
pub config: CrateConfig,
pub check_config: CrateCheckConfig,
pub edition: Edition,
pub missing_fragment_specifiers: Lock<FxHashMap<Span, NodeId>>,
/// Places where raw identifiers were used. This is used to avoid complaining about idents
/// clashing with keywords in new editions.
pub raw_identifier_spans: Lock<Vec<Span>>,
@ -195,7 +194,6 @@ impl ParseSess {
config: FxHashSet::default(),
check_config: CrateCheckConfig::default(),
edition: ExpnId::root().expn_data().edition,
missing_fragment_specifiers: Default::default(),
raw_identifier_spans: Lock::new(Vec::new()),
bad_unicode_identifiers: Lock::new(Default::default()),
source_map,

View file

@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ macro_rules! test {
($a, $b) => {
//~^ ERROR missing fragment
//~| ERROR missing fragment
//~| ERROR missing fragment
//~| WARN this was previously accepted
//~| WARN this was previously accepted
()
};

View file

@ -5,14 +5,23 @@ LL | ($a, $b) => {
| ^
error: missing fragment specifier
--> $DIR/macro-match-nonterminal.rs:2:10
--> $DIR/macro-match-nonterminal.rs:2:8
|
LL | ($a, $b) => {
| ^^
| ^
|
= note: `#[deny(missing_fragment_specifier)]` on by default
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #40107 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/40107>
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
error: missing fragment specifier
--> $DIR/macro-match-nonterminal.rs:2:10
|
LL | ($a, $b) => {
| ^^
|
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #40107 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/40107>
error: aborting due to 3 previous errors

View file

@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
// compile-flags: -Zdeduplicate-diagnostics=yes
macro_rules! m {
($name) => {}
//~^ ERROR missing fragment
//~| ERROR missing fragment
//~| WARN this was previously accepted
}
fn main() {
m!();
m!();
m!();
m!();
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
error: missing fragment specifier
--> $DIR/macro-missing-fragment-deduplication.rs:4:6
|
LL | ($name) => {}
| ^^^^^
error: missing fragment specifier
--> $DIR/macro-missing-fragment-deduplication.rs:4:6
|
LL | ($name) => {}
| ^^^^^
|
= note: `#[deny(missing_fragment_specifier)]` on by default
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #40107 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/40107>
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors

View file

@ -1,7 +1,26 @@
macro_rules! m {
( $( any_token $field_rust_type )* ) => {}; //~ ERROR missing fragment
#![warn(missing_fragment_specifier)]
macro_rules! used_arm {
( $( any_token $field_rust_type )* ) => {};
//~^ ERROR missing fragment
//~| WARN missing fragment
//~| WARN this was previously accepted
}
macro_rules! used_macro_unused_arm {
() => {};
( $name ) => {};
//~^ WARN missing fragment
//~| WARN this was previously accepted
}
macro_rules! unused_macro {
( $name ) => {};
//~^ WARN missing fragment
//~| WARN this was previously accepted
}
fn main() {
m!();
used_arm!();
used_macro_unused_arm!();
}

View file

@ -1,8 +1,40 @@
error: missing fragment specifier
--> $DIR/macro-missing-fragment.rs:2:20
--> $DIR/macro-missing-fragment.rs:4:20
|
LL | ( $( any_token $field_rust_type )* ) => {};
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
warning: missing fragment specifier
--> $DIR/macro-missing-fragment.rs:4:20
|
LL | ( $( any_token $field_rust_type )* ) => {};
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/macro-missing-fragment.rs:1:9
|
LL | #![warn(missing_fragment_specifier)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #40107 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/40107>
warning: missing fragment specifier
--> $DIR/macro-missing-fragment.rs:12:7
|
LL | ( $name ) => {};
| ^^^^^
|
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #40107 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/40107>
warning: missing fragment specifier
--> $DIR/macro-missing-fragment.rs:18:7
|
LL | ( $name ) => {};
| ^^^^^
|
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #40107 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/40107>
error: aborting due to previous error; 3 warnings emitted

View file

@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
macro_rules! foo {
{ $+ } => { //~ ERROR expected identifier, found `+`
//~^ ERROR missing fragment specifier
//~| ERROR missing fragment specifier
//~| WARN this was previously accepted
$(x)(y) //~ ERROR expected one of: `*`, `+`, or `?`
}
}

View file

@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ LL | { $+ } => {
| ^
error: expected one of: `*`, `+`, or `?`
--> $DIR/issue-33569.rs:4:13
--> $DIR/issue-33569.rs:6:13
|
LL | $(x)(y)
| ^^^
@ -16,5 +16,15 @@ error: missing fragment specifier
LL | { $+ } => {
| ^
error: aborting due to 3 previous errors
error: missing fragment specifier
--> $DIR/issue-33569.rs:2:8
|
LL | { $+ } => {
| ^
|
= note: `#[deny(missing_fragment_specifier)]` on by default
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #40107 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/40107>
error: aborting due to 4 previous errors