Use fulfillment in InferCtxt::evaluate_obligation
This commit is contained in:
parent
2bab422393
commit
1680334928
2 changed files with 15 additions and 30 deletions
|
@ -1,9 +1,8 @@
|
|||
use rustc_middle::traits::solve::{Certainty, Goal, MaybeCause};
|
||||
use rustc_infer::traits::{TraitEngine, TraitEngineExt};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty;
|
||||
|
||||
use crate::infer::canonical::OriginalQueryValues;
|
||||
use crate::infer::InferCtxt;
|
||||
use crate::solve::InferCtxtEvalExt;
|
||||
use crate::traits::{EvaluationResult, OverflowError, PredicateObligation, SelectionContext};
|
||||
|
||||
pub trait InferCtxtExt<'tcx> {
|
||||
|
@ -81,35 +80,20 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxtExt<'tcx> for InferCtxt<'tcx> {
|
|||
|
||||
if self.tcx.trait_solver_next() {
|
||||
self.probe(|snapshot| {
|
||||
if let Ok((_, certainty, nested_goals)) =
|
||||
self.evaluate_root_goal(Goal::new(self.tcx, param_env, obligation.predicate))
|
||||
{
|
||||
match certainty {
|
||||
// If we have nested obligations from instantiating the canonical
|
||||
// response from this goal, just treat the response as ambiguous.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// FIXME(deferred_projection_equality): We need to process this
|
||||
// in a loop probably... can't be worse than an ICE though
|
||||
Certainty::Yes if !nested_goals.is_empty() => {
|
||||
Ok(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToAmbig)
|
||||
}
|
||||
Certainty::Yes => {
|
||||
if self.opaque_types_added_in_snapshot(snapshot) {
|
||||
Ok(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToOkModuloOpaqueTypes)
|
||||
} else if self.region_constraints_added_in_snapshot(snapshot).is_some()
|
||||
{
|
||||
Ok(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToOkModuloRegions)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Ok(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToOk)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Ambiguity) => {
|
||||
Ok(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToAmbig)
|
||||
}
|
||||
Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Overflow) => Err(OverflowError::Canonical),
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
let mut fulfill_cx = crate::solve::FulfillmentCtxt::new();
|
||||
fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligation(self, obligation.clone());
|
||||
// True errors
|
||||
// FIXME(-Ztrait-solver=next): Overflows are reported as ambig here, is that OK?
|
||||
if !fulfill_cx.select_where_possible(self).is_empty() {
|
||||
Ok(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToErr)
|
||||
} else if !fulfill_cx.select_all_or_error(self).is_empty() {
|
||||
Ok(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToAmbig)
|
||||
} else if self.opaque_types_added_in_snapshot(snapshot) {
|
||||
Ok(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToOkModuloOpaqueTypes)
|
||||
} else if self.region_constraints_added_in_snapshot(snapshot).is_some() {
|
||||
Ok(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToOkModuloRegions)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Ok(EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToOk)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -618,6 +618,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
|||
let mut fulfill_cx = crate::solve::FulfillmentCtxt::new();
|
||||
fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligations(self.infcx, predicates);
|
||||
// True errors
|
||||
// FIXME(-Ztrait-solver=next): Overflows are reported as ambig here, is that OK?
|
||||
if !fulfill_cx.select_where_possible(self.infcx).is_empty() {
|
||||
return Ok(EvaluatedToErr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue