more nits
This commit is contained in:
parent
ca49a37390
commit
0e20155662
5 changed files with 65 additions and 49 deletions
|
@ -4433,42 +4433,25 @@ declare_lint! {
|
||||||
/// ```rust,compile_fail
|
/// ```rust,compile_fail
|
||||||
/// #![deny(coinductive_overlap_in_coherence)]
|
/// #![deny(coinductive_overlap_in_coherence)]
|
||||||
///
|
///
|
||||||
/// use std::borrow::Borrow;
|
/// trait CyclicTrait {}
|
||||||
/// use std::cmp::Ordering;
|
/// impl<T: CyclicTrait> CyclicTrait for T {}
|
||||||
/// use std::marker::PhantomData;
|
|
||||||
///
|
///
|
||||||
/// #[derive(PartialEq, Default)]
|
/// trait Trait {}
|
||||||
/// pub(crate) struct Interval<T>(T);
|
/// impl<T: CyclicTrait> Trait for T {}
|
||||||
///
|
/// // conflicting impl with the above
|
||||||
/// impl<T, Q> PartialEq<Q> for Interval<T>
|
/// impl Trait for u8 {}
|
||||||
/// where
|
|
||||||
/// Q: PartialOrd,
|
|
||||||
/// {
|
|
||||||
/// fn eq(&self, other: &Q) -> bool {
|
|
||||||
/// todo!()
|
|
||||||
/// }
|
|
||||||
/// }
|
|
||||||
///
|
|
||||||
/// impl<T, Q> PartialOrd<Q> for Interval<T>
|
|
||||||
/// where
|
|
||||||
/// Q: PartialOrd,
|
|
||||||
/// {
|
|
||||||
/// fn partial_cmp(&self, other: &Q) -> Option<Ordering> {
|
|
||||||
/// todo!()
|
|
||||||
/// }
|
|
||||||
/// }
|
|
||||||
/// ```
|
/// ```
|
||||||
///
|
///
|
||||||
/// {{produces}}
|
/// {{produces}}
|
||||||
///
|
///
|
||||||
/// ### Explanation
|
/// ### Explanation
|
||||||
///
|
///
|
||||||
/// The manual impl of `PartialEq` impl overlaps with the `derive`, since
|
/// We have two choices for impl which satisfy `u8: Trait`: the blanket impl
|
||||||
/// if we replace `Q = Interval<T>`, then the second impl leads to a cycle:
|
/// for generic `T`, and the direct impl for `u8`. These two impls nominally
|
||||||
/// `PartialOrd for Interval<T> where Interval<T>: PartialOrd`. This cycle
|
/// overlap, since we can infer `T = u8` in the former impl, but since the where
|
||||||
/// currently causes the compiler to consider `Interval<T>: PartialOrd` to not
|
/// clause `u8: CyclicTrait` would end up resulting in a cycle (since it depends
|
||||||
/// hold, causing the two implementations to be disjoint. This will change in
|
/// on itself), the blanket impl is not considered to hold for `u8`. This will
|
||||||
/// a future release.
|
/// change in a future release.
|
||||||
pub COINDUCTIVE_OVERLAP_IN_COHERENCE,
|
pub COINDUCTIVE_OVERLAP_IN_COHERENCE,
|
||||||
Warn,
|
Warn,
|
||||||
"impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to \
|
"impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to \
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -231,10 +231,29 @@ fn overlap<'tcx>(
|
||||||
COINDUCTIVE_OVERLAP_IN_COHERENCE,
|
COINDUCTIVE_OVERLAP_IN_COHERENCE,
|
||||||
infcx.tcx.local_def_id_to_hir_id(first_local_impl),
|
infcx.tcx.local_def_id_to_hir_id(first_local_impl),
|
||||||
infcx.tcx.def_span(first_local_impl),
|
infcx.tcx.def_span(first_local_impl),
|
||||||
"impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to \
|
format!(
|
||||||
overlap in the future",
|
"implementations {} will conflict in the future",
|
||||||
|
match impl1_header.trait_ref {
|
||||||
|
Some(trait_ref) => {
|
||||||
|
let trait_ref = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(trait_ref);
|
||||||
|
format!(
|
||||||
|
"of `{}` for `{}`",
|
||||||
|
trait_ref.print_only_trait_path(),
|
||||||
|
trait_ref.self_ty()
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
None => format!(
|
||||||
|
"for `{}`",
|
||||||
|
infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(impl1_header.self_ty)
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|lint| {
|
|lint| {
|
||||||
lint.span_label(
|
lint.note(
|
||||||
|
"impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to \
|
||||||
|
overlap in the future",
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
.span_label(
|
||||||
infcx.tcx.def_span(impl1_header.impl_def_id),
|
infcx.tcx.def_span(impl1_header.impl_def_id),
|
||||||
"the first impl is here",
|
"the first impl is here",
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
@ -245,8 +264,12 @@ fn overlap<'tcx>(
|
||||||
if !failing_obligation.cause.span.is_dummy() {
|
if !failing_obligation.cause.span.is_dummy() {
|
||||||
lint.span_label(
|
lint.span_label(
|
||||||
failing_obligation.cause.span,
|
failing_obligation.cause.span,
|
||||||
"this where-clause causes a cycle, but it may be treated \
|
format!(
|
||||||
as possibly holding in the future, causing the impls to overlap",
|
"`{}` may be considered to hold in future releases, \
|
||||||
|
causing the impls to overlap",
|
||||||
|
infcx
|
||||||
|
.resolve_vars_if_possible(failing_obligation.predicate)
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
);
|
);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
lint
|
lint
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -202,10 +202,25 @@ enum BuiltinImplConditions<'tcx> {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
|
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
|
||||||
pub enum TreatInductiveCycleAs {
|
pub enum TreatInductiveCycleAs {
|
||||||
|
/// This is the previous behavior, where `Recur` represents an inductive
|
||||||
|
/// cycle that is known not to hold. This is not forwards-compatible with
|
||||||
|
/// coinduction, and will be deprecated. This is the default behavior
|
||||||
|
/// of the old trait solver due to back-compat reasons.
|
||||||
Recur,
|
Recur,
|
||||||
|
/// This is the behavior of the new trait solver, where inductive cycles
|
||||||
|
/// are treated as ambiguous and possibly holding.
|
||||||
Ambig,
|
Ambig,
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
impl From<TreatInductiveCycleAs> for EvaluationResult {
|
||||||
|
fn from(treat: TreatInductiveCycleAs) -> EvaluationResult {
|
||||||
|
match treat {
|
||||||
|
TreatInductiveCycleAs::Ambig => EvaluatedToUnknown,
|
||||||
|
TreatInductiveCycleAs::Recur => EvaluatedToRecur,
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||||
pub fn new(infcx: &'cx InferCtxt<'tcx>) -> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
pub fn new(infcx: &'cx InferCtxt<'tcx>) -> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||||
SelectionContext {
|
SelectionContext {
|
||||||
|
@ -223,6 +238,9 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||||
treat_inductive_cycle: TreatInductiveCycleAs,
|
treat_inductive_cycle: TreatInductiveCycleAs,
|
||||||
f: impl FnOnce(&mut Self) -> T,
|
f: impl FnOnce(&mut Self) -> T,
|
||||||
) -> T {
|
) -> T {
|
||||||
|
// Should be executed in a context where caching is disabled,
|
||||||
|
// otherwise the cache is poisoned with the temporary result.
|
||||||
|
assert!(self.is_intercrate());
|
||||||
let treat_inductive_cycle =
|
let treat_inductive_cycle =
|
||||||
std::mem::replace(&mut self.treat_inductive_cycle, treat_inductive_cycle);
|
std::mem::replace(&mut self.treat_inductive_cycle, treat_inductive_cycle);
|
||||||
let value = f(self);
|
let value = f(self);
|
||||||
|
@ -741,10 +759,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||||
stack.update_reached_depth(stack_arg.1);
|
stack.update_reached_depth(stack_arg.1);
|
||||||
return Ok(EvaluatedToOk);
|
return Ok(EvaluatedToOk);
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
match self.treat_inductive_cycle {
|
return Ok(self.treat_inductive_cycle.into());
|
||||||
TreatInductiveCycleAs::Ambig => return Ok(EvaluatedToUnknown),
|
|
||||||
TreatInductiveCycleAs::Recur => return Ok(EvaluatedToRecur),
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
return Ok(EvaluatedToOk);
|
return Ok(EvaluatedToOk);
|
||||||
|
@ -862,10 +877,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
ProjectAndUnifyResult::FailedNormalization => Ok(EvaluatedToAmbig),
|
ProjectAndUnifyResult::FailedNormalization => Ok(EvaluatedToAmbig),
|
||||||
ProjectAndUnifyResult::Recursive => match self.treat_inductive_cycle {
|
ProjectAndUnifyResult::Recursive => Ok(self.treat_inductive_cycle.into()),
|
||||||
TreatInductiveCycleAs::Ambig => return Ok(EvaluatedToUnknown),
|
|
||||||
TreatInductiveCycleAs::Recur => return Ok(EvaluatedToRecur),
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
ProjectAndUnifyResult::MismatchedProjectionTypes(_) => Ok(EvaluatedToErr),
|
ProjectAndUnifyResult::MismatchedProjectionTypes(_) => Ok(EvaluatedToErr),
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -1179,10 +1191,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||||
Some(EvaluatedToOk)
|
Some(EvaluatedToOk)
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
debug!("evaluate_stack --> recursive, inductive");
|
debug!("evaluate_stack --> recursive, inductive");
|
||||||
match self.treat_inductive_cycle {
|
Some(self.treat_inductive_cycle.into())
|
||||||
TreatInductiveCycleAs::Ambig => Some(EvaluatedToUnknown),
|
|
||||||
TreatInductiveCycleAs::Recur => Some(EvaluatedToRecur),
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
None
|
None
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ pub(crate) struct Interval<T>(PhantomData<T>);
|
||||||
// `Interval<?1>: PartialOrd<Interval<?1>>` candidate which results
|
// `Interval<?1>: PartialOrd<Interval<?1>>` candidate which results
|
||||||
// in a - currently inductive - cycle.
|
// in a - currently inductive - cycle.
|
||||||
impl<T, Q> PartialEq<Q> for Interval<T>
|
impl<T, Q> PartialEq<Q> for Interval<T>
|
||||||
//~^ ERROR impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to overlap in the future
|
//~^ ERROR implementations of `PartialEq<Interval<_>>` for `Interval<_>` will conflict in the future
|
||||||
//~| WARN this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out
|
//~| WARN this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out
|
||||||
where
|
where
|
||||||
T: Borrow<Q>,
|
T: Borrow<Q>,
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||||
error: impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to overlap in the future
|
error: implementations of `PartialEq<Interval<_>>` for `Interval<_>` will conflict in the future
|
||||||
--> $DIR/warn-when-cycle-is-error-in-coherence.rs:13:1
|
--> $DIR/warn-when-cycle-is-error-in-coherence.rs:13:1
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
LL | #[derive(PartialEq, Default)]
|
LL | #[derive(PartialEq, Default)]
|
||||||
|
@ -8,10 +8,11 @@ LL | impl<T, Q> PartialEq<Q> for Interval<T>
|
||||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the first impl is here
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the first impl is here
|
||||||
...
|
...
|
||||||
LL | Q: ?Sized + PartialOrd,
|
LL | Q: ?Sized + PartialOrd,
|
||||||
| ---------- this where-clause causes a cycle, but it may be treated as possibly holding in the future, causing the impls to overlap
|
| ---------- `Interval<_>: PartialOrd` may be considered to hold in future releases, causing the impls to overlap
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
|
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
|
||||||
= note: for more information, see issue #114040 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114040>
|
= note: for more information, see issue #114040 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114040>
|
||||||
|
= note: impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to overlap in the future
|
||||||
note: the lint level is defined here
|
note: the lint level is defined here
|
||||||
--> $DIR/warn-when-cycle-is-error-in-coherence.rs:1:9
|
--> $DIR/warn-when-cycle-is-error-in-coherence.rs:1:9
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue