Rollup merge of #113698 - compiler-errors:rpitit-check, r=spastorino

Make it clearer that we're just checking for an RPITIT

Tiny nit to use `is_impl_trait_in_trait` more, to make it clearer that we're just checking whether a def-id is an RPITIT, rather than doing something meaningful with the `opt_rpitit_info`.

r? `@spastorino`
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Krüger 2023-07-14 19:33:29 +02:00 committed by GitHub
commit 0baf4406da
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
9 changed files with 14 additions and 10 deletions

View file

@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ fn suggest_restriction<'tcx>(
) {
if hir_generics.where_clause_span.from_expansion()
|| hir_generics.where_clause_span.desugaring_kind().is_some()
|| projection.is_some_and(|projection| tcx.opt_rpitit_info(projection.def_id).is_some())
|| projection.is_some_and(|projection| tcx.is_impl_trait_in_trait(projection.def_id))
{
return;
}

View file

@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ fn object_safety_violation_for_assoc_item(
ty::AssocKind::Type => {
if !tcx.features().generic_associated_types_extended
&& !tcx.generics_of(item.def_id).params.is_empty()
&& item.opt_rpitit_info.is_none()
&& !item.is_impl_trait_in_trait()
{
Some(ObjectSafetyViolation::GAT(item.name, item.ident(tcx).span))
} else {