Refactor try_print_trimmed_def_path
.
Inverting the condition lets us merge the two `Ok(false)` paths. I also find the inverted condition easier to read: "all the things that must be true for trimming to occur", instead of "any of the things that must be true for trimming to not occur".
This commit is contained in:
parent
4efddb141a
commit
086d17b7cb
1 changed files with 11 additions and 18 deletions
|
@ -365,26 +365,19 @@ pub trait PrettyPrinter<'tcx>: Printer<'tcx> + fmt::Write {
|
|||
|
||||
/// Try to see if this path can be trimmed to a unique symbol name.
|
||||
fn try_print_trimmed_def_path(&mut self, def_id: DefId) -> Result<bool, PrintError> {
|
||||
if with_forced_trimmed_paths() {
|
||||
let trimmed = self.force_print_trimmed_def_path(def_id)?;
|
||||
if trimmed {
|
||||
return Ok(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if with_forced_trimmed_paths() && self.force_print_trimmed_def_path(def_id)? {
|
||||
return Ok(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !self.tcx().sess.opts.unstable_opts.trim_diagnostic_paths
|
||||
|| matches!(self.tcx().sess.opts.trimmed_def_paths, TrimmedDefPaths::Never)
|
||||
|| with_no_trimmed_paths()
|
||||
|| with_crate_prefix()
|
||||
if self.tcx().sess.opts.unstable_opts.trim_diagnostic_paths
|
||||
&& !matches!(self.tcx().sess.opts.trimmed_def_paths, TrimmedDefPaths::Never)
|
||||
&& !with_no_trimmed_paths()
|
||||
&& !with_crate_prefix()
|
||||
&& let Some(symbol) = self.tcx().trimmed_def_paths(()).get(&def_id)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return Ok(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
match self.tcx().trimmed_def_paths(()).get(&def_id) {
|
||||
None => Ok(false),
|
||||
Some(symbol) => {
|
||||
write!(self, "{}", Ident::with_dummy_span(*symbol))?;
|
||||
Ok(true)
|
||||
}
|
||||
write!(self, "{}", Ident::with_dummy_span(*symbol))?;
|
||||
Ok(true)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Ok(false)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue