Do not suggest wrapping an item if it has ambiguous un-imported methods
This commit is contained in:
parent
03a8cc7df1
commit
0626919f21
4 changed files with 65 additions and 39 deletions
|
@ -1485,27 +1485,38 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
(self.tcx.mk_mut_ref(self.tcx.lifetimes.re_erased, rcvr_ty), "&mut "),
|
||||
(self.tcx.mk_imm_ref(self.tcx.lifetimes.re_erased, rcvr_ty), "&"),
|
||||
] {
|
||||
if let Ok(pick) = self.lookup_probe(
|
||||
match self.lookup_probe(
|
||||
span,
|
||||
item_name,
|
||||
*rcvr_ty,
|
||||
rcvr,
|
||||
crate::check::method::probe::ProbeScope::AllTraits,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
// If the method is defined for the receiver we have, it likely wasn't `use`d.
|
||||
// We point at the method, but we just skip the rest of the check for arbitrary
|
||||
// self types and rely on the suggestion to `use` the trait from
|
||||
// `suggest_valid_traits`.
|
||||
let did = Some(pick.item.container.id());
|
||||
let skip = skippable.contains(&did);
|
||||
if pick.autoderefs == 0 && !skip {
|
||||
err.span_label(
|
||||
pick.item.ident(self.tcx).span,
|
||||
&format!("the method is available for `{}` here", rcvr_ty),
|
||||
);
|
||||
Ok(pick) => {
|
||||
// If the method is defined for the receiver we have, it likely wasn't `use`d.
|
||||
// We point at the method, but we just skip the rest of the check for arbitrary
|
||||
// self types and rely on the suggestion to `use` the trait from
|
||||
// `suggest_valid_traits`.
|
||||
let did = Some(pick.item.container.id());
|
||||
let skip = skippable.contains(&did);
|
||||
if pick.autoderefs == 0 && !skip {
|
||||
err.span_label(
|
||||
pick.item.ident(self.tcx).span,
|
||||
&format!("the method is available for `{}` here", rcvr_ty),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
Err(MethodError::Ambiguity(_)) => {
|
||||
// If the method is defined (but ambiguous) for the receiver we have, it is also
|
||||
// likely we haven't `use`d it. It may be possible that if we `Box`/`Pin`/etc.
|
||||
// the receiver, then it might disambiguate this method, but I think these
|
||||
// suggestions are generally misleading (see #94218).
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (rcvr_ty, pre) in &[
|
||||
(self.tcx.mk_lang_item(*rcvr_ty, LangItem::OwnedBox), "Box::new"),
|
||||
(self.tcx.mk_lang_item(*rcvr_ty, LangItem::Pin), "Pin::new"),
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue