Use fewer delayed bugs.

For some cases where it's clear that an error has already occurred,
e.g.:
- there's a comment stating exactly that, or
- things like HIR lowering, where we are lowering an error kind

The commit also tweaks some comments around delayed bug sites.

compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/astconv/mod.rs

@@ -758,8 +758,8 @@ impl<'o, 'tcx> dyn AstConv<'tcx> + 'o {
             // since we should have emitten an error for them earlier, and they will
             // not be well-formed!
             if polarity == ty::ImplPolarity::Negative {
-                self.tcx().dcx().span_delayed_bug(
-                    binding.span,
+                assert!(
+                    self.tcx().dcx().has_errors().is_some(),
                     "negative trait bounds should not have bindings",
                 );
                 continue;

compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/wfcheck.rs

@@ -1865,13 +1865,13 @@ fn check_variances_for_type_defn<'tcx>(
         let hir_param = &hir_generics.params[index];
 
         if ty_param.def_id != hir_param.def_id.into() {
-            // valid programs always have lifetimes before types in the generic parameter list
+            // Valid programs always have lifetimes before types in the generic parameter list.
             // ty_generics are normalized to be in this required order, and variances are built
             // from ty generics, not from hir generics. but we need hir generics to get
-            // a span out
+            // a span out.
             //
-            // if they aren't in the same order, then the user has written invalid code, and already
-            // got an error about it (or I'm wrong about this)
+            // If they aren't in the same order, then the user has written invalid code, and already
+            // got an error about it (or I'm wrong about this).
             tcx.dcx().span_delayed_bug(
                 hir_param.span,
                 "hir generics and ty generics in different order",

compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/coherence/unsafety.rs

@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ pub(super) fn check_item(
 
         (_, _, Unsafety::Unsafe, Negative) => {
             // Reported in AST validation
-            tcx.dcx().span_delayed_bug(tcx.def_span(def_id), "unsafe negative impl");
+            assert!(tcx.dcx().has_errors().is_some(), "unsafe negative impl");
             Ok(())
         }
         (_, _, Unsafety::Normal, Negative)