Auto merge of #95466 - Dylan-DPC:rollup-g7ddr8y, r=Dylan-DPC
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - #95294 (Document Linux kernel handoff in std::io::copy and std::fs::copy) - #95443 (Clarify how `src/tools/x` searches for python) - #95452 (fix since field version for termination stabilization) - #95460 (Spellchecking compiler code) - #95461 (Spellchecking some comments) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This commit is contained in:
commit
05142a7e44
57 changed files with 107 additions and 87 deletions
|
@ -407,10 +407,10 @@ impl<'tcx> rustc_mir_dataflow::GenKillAnalysis<'tcx> for Borrows<'_, 'tcx> {
|
|||
fn terminator_effect(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
trans: &mut impl GenKill<Self::Idx>,
|
||||
teminator: &mir::Terminator<'tcx>,
|
||||
terminator: &mir::Terminator<'tcx>,
|
||||
_location: Location,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
if let mir::TerminatorKind::InlineAsm { operands, .. } = &teminator.kind {
|
||||
if let mir::TerminatorKind::InlineAsm { operands, .. } = &terminator.kind {
|
||||
for op in operands {
|
||||
if let mir::InlineAsmOperand::Out { place: Some(place), .. }
|
||||
| mir::InlineAsmOperand::InOut { out_place: Some(place), .. } = *op
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ impl OutlivesSuggestionBuilder {
|
|||
| RegionNameSource::NamedFreeRegion(..)
|
||||
| RegionNameSource::Static => true,
|
||||
|
||||
// Don't give suggestions for upvars, closure return types, or other unnamable
|
||||
// Don't give suggestions for upvars, closure return types, or other unnameable
|
||||
// regions.
|
||||
RegionNameSource::SynthesizedFreeEnvRegion(..)
|
||||
| RegionNameSource::AnonRegionFromArgument(..)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
// FIXME. We should handle this case better. It
|
||||
// indicates that we have e.g., some region variable
|
||||
// whose value is like `'a+'b` where `'a` and `'b` are
|
||||
// distinct unrelated univesal regions that are not
|
||||
// distinct unrelated universal regions that are not
|
||||
// known to outlive one another. It'd be nice to have
|
||||
// some examples where this arises to decide how best
|
||||
// to report it; we could probably handle it by
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> InvalidationGenerator<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
|||
// borrow); so don't check if they interfere.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// NOTE: *reservations* do conflict with themselves;
|
||||
// thus aren't injecting unsoundenss w/ this check.)
|
||||
// thus aren't injecting unsoundness w/ this check.)
|
||||
(Activation(_, activating), _) if activating == borrow_index => {
|
||||
// Activating a borrow doesn't generate any invalidations, since we
|
||||
// have already taken the reservation
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1048,7 +1048,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
|||
// borrow); so don't check if they interfere.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// NOTE: *reservations* do conflict with themselves;
|
||||
// thus aren't injecting unsoundenss w/ this check.)
|
||||
// thus aren't injecting unsoundness w/ this check.)
|
||||
(Activation(_, activating), _) if activating == borrow_index => {
|
||||
debug!(
|
||||
"check_access_for_conflict place_span: {:?} sd: {:?} rw: {:?} \
|
||||
|
@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
|||
);
|
||||
// rust-lang/rust#56254 - This was previously permitted on
|
||||
// the 2018 edition so we emit it as a warning. We buffer
|
||||
// these sepately so that we only emit a warning if borrow
|
||||
// these separately so that we only emit a warning if borrow
|
||||
// checking was otherwise successful.
|
||||
this.reservation_warnings
|
||||
.insert(bi, (place_span.0, place_span.1, location, bk, borrow.clone()));
|
||||
|
@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
|||
) {
|
||||
debug!("check_if_reassignment_to_immutable_state({:?})", local);
|
||||
|
||||
// Check if any of the initializiations of `local` have happened yet:
|
||||
// Check if any of the initializations of `local` have happened yet:
|
||||
if let Some(init_index) = self.is_local_ever_initialized(local, flow_state) {
|
||||
// And, if so, report an error.
|
||||
let init = &self.move_data.inits[init_index];
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
let universe_a = self.scc_universes[scc_a];
|
||||
|
||||
// Quick check: if scc_b's declared universe is a subset of
|
||||
// scc_a's declared univese (typically, both are ROOT), then
|
||||
// scc_a's declared universe (typically, both are ROOT), then
|
||||
// it cannot contain any problematic universe elements.
|
||||
if universe_a.can_name(self.scc_universes[scc_b]) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
@ -1993,7 +1993,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
|
|||
.iter()
|
||||
.find_map(|constraint| {
|
||||
if let ConstraintCategory::Predicate(predicate_span) = constraint.category {
|
||||
// We currentl'y doesn't store the `DefId` in the `ConstraintCategory`
|
||||
// We currently do not store the `DefId` in the `ConstraintCategory`
|
||||
// for performances reasons. The error reporting code used by NLL only
|
||||
// uses the span, so this doesn't cause any problems at the moment.
|
||||
Some(ObligationCauseCode::BindingObligation(
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2507,7 +2507,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
// we have to solve them here where we instantiate the
|
||||
// closure.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Despite the opacity of the previous parapgrah, this is
|
||||
// Despite the opacity of the previous paragraph, this is
|
||||
// actually relatively easy to understand in terms of the
|
||||
// desugaring. A closure gets desugared to a struct, and
|
||||
// these extra requirements are basically like where
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue