Increase accuracy of if condition misparse suggestion

Look at the expression that was parsed when trying to recover from a bad `if` condition to determine what was likely intended by the user beyond "maybe this was meant to be an `else` body".

```
error: expected `{`, found `map`
  --> $DIR/missing-dot-on-if-condition-expression-fixable.rs:4:30
   |
LL |     for _ in [1, 2, 3].iter()map(|x| x) {}
   |                              ^^^ expected `{`
   |
help: you might have meant to write a method call
   |
LL |     for _ in [1, 2, 3].iter().map(|x| x) {}
   |                              +
```
This commit is contained in:
Esteban Küber 2024-11-14 20:29:24 +00:00
parent 917a50a039
commit 04fe839177
8 changed files with 385 additions and 17 deletions

View file

@ -475,6 +475,7 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
}
fn error_block_no_opening_brace_msg(&mut self, msg: Cow<'static, str>) -> Diag<'a> {
let prev = self.prev_token.span;
let sp = self.token.span;
let mut e = self.dcx().struct_span_err(sp, msg);
let do_not_suggest_help = self.token.is_keyword(kw::In) || self.token == token::Colon;
@ -514,15 +515,94 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
} else {
stmt.span
};
e.multipart_suggestion(
"try placing this code inside a block",
vec![
(stmt_span.shrink_to_lo(), "{ ".to_string()),
(stmt_span.shrink_to_hi(), " }".to_string()),
],
// Speculative; has been misleading in the past (#46836).
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
match (&self.token.kind, &stmt.kind) {
(token::OpenDelim(Delimiter::Brace), StmtKind::Expr(expr))
if let ExprKind::Call(..) = expr.kind =>
{
// for _ in x y() {}
e.span_suggestion_verbose(
prev.between(sp),
"you might have meant to write a method call",
".".to_string(),
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
(token::OpenDelim(Delimiter::Brace), StmtKind::Expr(expr))
if let ExprKind::Field(..) = expr.kind =>
{
// for _ in x y.z {}
e.span_suggestion_verbose(
prev.between(sp),
"you might have meant to write a field access",
".".to_string(),
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
(token::CloseDelim(Delimiter::Brace), StmtKind::Expr(expr))
if let ExprKind::Struct(expr) = &expr.kind
&& let None = expr.qself
&& expr.path.segments.len() == 1 =>
{
// This is specific to "mistyped `if` condition followed by empty body"
//
// for _ in x y {}
e.span_suggestion_verbose(
prev.between(sp),
"you might have meant to write a field access",
".".to_string(),
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
(token::OpenDelim(Delimiter::Brace), StmtKind::Expr(expr))
if let ExprKind::Lit(lit) = expr.kind
&& let None = lit.suffix
&& let token::LitKind::Integer | token::LitKind::Float = lit.kind =>
{
// for _ in x 0 {}
// for _ in x 0.0 {}
e.span_suggestion_verbose(
prev.between(sp),
format!("you might have meant to write a field access"),
".".to_string(),
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
(token::OpenDelim(Delimiter::Brace), StmtKind::Expr(expr))
if let ExprKind::Loop(..)
| ExprKind::If(..)
| ExprKind::While(..)
| ExprKind::Match(..)
| ExprKind::ForLoop { .. }
| ExprKind::TryBlock(..)
| ExprKind::Ret(..)
| ExprKind::Closure(..)
| ExprKind::Struct(..)
| ExprKind::Try(..) = expr.kind =>
{
// These are more likely to have been meant as a block body.
e.multipart_suggestion(
"try placing this code inside a block",
vec![
(stmt_span.shrink_to_lo(), "{ ".to_string()),
(stmt_span.shrink_to_hi(), " }".to_string()),
],
// Speculative; has been misleading in the past (#46836).
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
(token::OpenDelim(Delimiter::Brace), _) => {}
(_, _) => {
e.multipart_suggestion(
"try placing this code inside a block",
vec![
(stmt_span.shrink_to_lo(), "{ ".to_string()),
(stmt_span.shrink_to_hi(), " }".to_string()),
],
// Speculative; has been misleading in the past (#46836).
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
}
}
Err(e) => {
self.recover_stmt_(SemiColonMode::Break, BlockMode::Ignore);