rust/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/ub-enum.rs

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

109 lines
3.5 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

// Strip out raw byte dumps to make comparison platform-independent:
//@ normalize-stderr: "(the raw bytes of the constant) \(size: [0-9]*, align: [0-9]*\)" -> "$1 (size: $$SIZE, align: $$ALIGN)"
//@ normalize-stderr: "([0-9a-f][0-9a-f] |╾─*ALLOC[0-9]+(\+[a-z0-9]+)?(<imm>)?─*╼ )+ *│.*" -> "HEX_DUMP"
//@ normalize-stderr: "0x0+" -> "0x0"
2023-09-28 10:07:40 -07:00
#![feature(never_type)]
2022-09-27 15:59:10 +02:00
#![allow(invalid_value)]
use std::mem;
#[repr(transparent)]
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
struct Wrap<T>(T);
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
enum Never {}
// # simple enum with discriminant 0
#[repr(usize)]
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
enum Enum {
A = 0,
}
const GOOD_ENUM: Enum = unsafe { mem::transmute(0usize) };
const BAD_ENUM: Enum = unsafe { mem::transmute(1usize) };
//~^ ERROR is undefined behavior
const BAD_ENUM_PTR: Enum = unsafe { mem::transmute(&1) };
2022-09-21 13:05:20 +02:00
//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
const BAD_ENUM_WRAPPED: Wrap<Enum> = unsafe { mem::transmute(&1) };
2022-09-21 13:05:20 +02:00
//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
// # simple enum with discriminant 2
// (Potentially) invalid enum discriminant
#[repr(usize)]
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
enum Enum2 {
A = 2,
}
const BAD_ENUM2: Enum2 = unsafe { mem::transmute(0usize) };
//~^ ERROR is undefined behavior
const BAD_ENUM2_PTR: Enum2 = unsafe { mem::transmute(&0) };
2022-09-21 13:05:20 +02:00
//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
// something wrapping the enum so that we test layout first, not enum
const BAD_ENUM2_WRAPPED: Wrap<Enum2> = unsafe { mem::transmute(&0) };
2022-09-21 13:05:20 +02:00
//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
2018-11-07 13:51:29 +01:00
// Undef enum discriminant.
#[repr(C)]
union MaybeUninit<T: Copy> {
uninit: (),
init: T,
}
const BAD_ENUM2_UNDEF : Enum2 = unsafe { MaybeUninit { uninit: () }.init };
//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
//~| uninitialized
// Pointer value in an enum with a niche that is not just 0.
const BAD_ENUM2_OPTION_PTR: Option<Enum2> = unsafe { mem::transmute(&0) };
2022-09-21 13:05:20 +02:00
//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
// # valid discriminant for uninhabited variant
// An enum with uninhabited variants but also at least 2 inhabited variants -- so the uninhabited
// variants *do* have a discriminant.
enum UninhDiscriminant {
A,
B(!),
C,
D(Never),
}
const GOOD_INHABITED_VARIANT1: UninhDiscriminant = unsafe { mem::transmute(0u8) }; // variant A
const GOOD_INHABITED_VARIANT2: UninhDiscriminant = unsafe { mem::transmute(2u8) }; // variant C
const BAD_UNINHABITED_VARIANT1: UninhDiscriminant = unsafe { mem::transmute(1u8) };
//~^ ERROR is undefined behavior
const BAD_UNINHABITED_VARIANT2: UninhDiscriminant = unsafe { mem::transmute(3u8) };
//~^ ERROR is undefined behavior
// # other
// Invalid enum field content (mostly to test printing of paths for enum tuple
// variants and tuples).
// Need to create something which does not clash with enum layout optimizations.
const BAD_OPTION_CHAR: Option<(char, char)> = Some(('x', unsafe { mem::transmute(!0u32) }));
//~^ ERROR is undefined behavior
// All variants are uninhabited but also have data.
// Use `0` as constant to make behavior endianness-independent.
const BAD_UNINHABITED_WITH_DATA1: Result<(i32, Never), (i32, !)> = unsafe { mem::transmute(0u64) };
//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
const BAD_UNINHABITED_WITH_DATA2: Result<(i32, !), (i32, Never)> = unsafe { mem::transmute(0u64) };
//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
const TEST_ICE_89765: () = {
// This is a regression test for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89765.
unsafe { std::mem::discriminant(&*(&() as *const () as *const Never)); };
Shorten span of panic failures in const context Previously, we included a redundant prefix on the panic message and a postfix of the location of the panic. The prefix didn't carry any additional information beyond "something failed", and the location of the panic is redundant with the diagnostic's span, which gets printed out even if its code is not shown. ``` error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed --> $DIR/assert-type-intrinsics.rs:11:9 | LL | MaybeUninit::<!>::uninit().assume_init(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ evaluation panicked: aborted execution: attempted to instantiate uninhabited type `!` ``` ``` error[E0080]: evaluation of `Fail::<i32>::C` failed --> $DIR/collect-in-dead-closure.rs:9:19 | LL | const C: () = panic!(); | ^^^^^^^^ evaluation panicked: explicit panic | = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::panic::panic_2015` which comes from the expansion of the macro `panic` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) ``` ``` error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed --> $DIR/uninhabited.rs:41:9 | LL | assert!(false); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ evaluation panicked: assertion failed: false | = note: this error originates in the macro `assert` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) ``` --- When the primary span for a const error is the same as the first frame in the const error report, skip it. ``` error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed --> $DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:3:24 | LL | const _CONST: &[u8] = &f(&[], |_| {}); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ evaluation panicked: explicit panic | note: inside `f::<{closure@$DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:3:31: 3:34}>` --> $DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:10:5 | LL | panic!() | ^^^^^^^^ the failure occurred here = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::panic::panic_2015` which comes from the expansion of the macro `panic` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) ``` instead of ``` error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed --> $DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:10:5 | LL | panic!() | ^^^^^^^^ explicit panic | note: inside `f::<{closure@$DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:3:31: 3:34}>` --> $DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:10:5 | LL | panic!() | ^^^^^^^^ note: inside `_CONST` --> $DIR/issue-88434-removal-index-should-be-less.rs:3:24 | LL | const _CONST: &[u8] = &f(&[], |_| {}); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::panic::panic_2015` which comes from the expansion of the macro `panic` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) ``` --- Revert order of constant evaluation errors Point at the code the user wrote first and std functions last. ``` error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed --> $DIR/const-errs-dont-conflict-103369.rs:5:25 | LL | impl ConstGenericTrait<{my_fn(1)}> for () {} | ^^^^^^^^ evaluation panicked: Some error occurred | note: called from `my_fn` --> $DIR/const-errs-dont-conflict-103369.rs:10:5 | LL | panic!("Some error occurred"); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::panic::panic_2015` which comes from the expansion of the macro `panic` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) ``` instead of ``` error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed --> $DIR/const-errs-dont-conflict-103369.rs:10:5 | LL | panic!("Some error occurred"); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Some error occurred | note: called from `<() as ConstGenericTrait<{my_fn(1)}>>::{constant#0}` --> $DIR/const-errs-dont-conflict-103369.rs:5:25 | LL | impl ConstGenericTrait<{my_fn(1)}> for () {} | ^^^^^^^^ = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::panic::panic_2015` which comes from the expansion of the macro `panic` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) ```
2025-02-03 18:43:55 +00:00
//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
};
fn main() {
}