bjoernager/rust
bjoernager/rust
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Activity
rust/tests/coverage/try_error_result.cov-map

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

213 lines
12 KiB
Text
Raw Normal View History

Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
Function name: <try_error_result::Thing1>::get_thing_2
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-14 13:51:24 +10:00
Raw bytes (26): 0x[01, 01, 01, 01, 05, 04, 01, 29, 05, 01, 18, 05, 02, 0d, 00, 14, 02, 02, 0d, 00, 1a, 01, 02, 05, 00, 06]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-14 13:51:24 +10:00
Number of expressions: 1
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(1)
coverage: Store all of a function's mappings in function coverage info Previously, mappings were attached to individual coverage statements in MIR. That necessitated special handling in MIR optimizations to avoid deleting those statements, since otherwise codegen would be unable to reassemble the original list of mappings. With this change, a function's list of mappings is now attached to its MIR body, and survives intact even if individual statements are deleted by optimizations.
2023-09-13 12:51:43 +10:00
Number of file 0 mappings: 4
coverage: Add `#[rustfmt::skip]` to tests with non-standard formatting These tests deliberately use non-standard formatting, so that the line execution counts reported by `llvm-cov` reveal additional information about where code regions begin and end.
2024-01-16 13:40:01 +11:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 41, 5) to (start + 1, 24)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
- Code(Counter(1)) at (prev + 2, 13) to (start + 0, 20)
- Code(Expression(0, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 13) to (start + 0, 26)
= (c0 - c1)
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-14 13:51:24 +10:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 2, 5) to (start + 0, 6)
coverage: Include the highest counter ID seen in `.cov-map` dumps When making changes that have a large impact on coverage counter creation, this makes it easier to see whether the number of physical counters has changed. (The highest counter ID seen in coverage maps is not necessarily the same as the number of physical counters actually used by the instrumented code, but it's the best approximation we can get from looking only at the coverage maps, and it should be reasonably accurate in most cases.)
2024-10-08 13:13:05 +11:00
Highest counter ID seen: c1
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
Function name: <try_error_result::Thing2>::call
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-14 13:51:24 +10:00
Raw bytes (26): 0x[01, 01, 01, 01, 05, 04, 01, 34, 05, 01, 18, 05, 02, 0d, 00, 14, 02, 02, 0d, 00, 13, 01, 02, 05, 00, 06]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-14 13:51:24 +10:00
Number of expressions: 1
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(1)
coverage: Store all of a function's mappings in function coverage info Previously, mappings were attached to individual coverage statements in MIR. That necessitated special handling in MIR optimizations to avoid deleting those statements, since otherwise codegen would be unable to reassemble the original list of mappings. With this change, a function's list of mappings is now attached to its MIR body, and survives intact even if individual statements are deleted by optimizations.
2023-09-13 12:51:43 +10:00
Number of file 0 mappings: 4
coverage: Add `#[rustfmt::skip]` to tests with non-standard formatting These tests deliberately use non-standard formatting, so that the line execution counts reported by `llvm-cov` reveal additional information about where code regions begin and end.
2024-01-16 13:40:01 +11:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 52, 5) to (start + 1, 24)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
- Code(Counter(1)) at (prev + 2, 13) to (start + 0, 20)
- Code(Expression(0, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 13) to (start + 0, 19)
= (c0 - c1)
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-14 13:51:24 +10:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 2, 5) to (start + 0, 6)
coverage: Include the highest counter ID seen in `.cov-map` dumps When making changes that have a large impact on coverage counter creation, this makes it easier to see whether the number of physical counters has changed. (The highest counter ID seen in coverage maps is not necessarily the same as the number of physical counters actually used by the instrumented code, but it's the best approximation we can get from looking only at the coverage maps, and it should be reasonably accurate in most cases.)
2024-10-08 13:13:05 +11:00
Highest counter ID seen: c1
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
Function name: try_error_result::call
Tweak various coverage test files for slightly nicer formatting For coverage tests, splitting code across multiple lines often makes the resulting coverage report easier to interpret, so we force rustfmt to retain line breaks by adding dummy line comments with `//`.
2024-05-29 14:06:53 +10:00
Raw bytes (26): 0x[01, 01, 01, 01, 05, 04, 01, 05, 01, 01, 14, 05, 02, 09, 00, 10, 02, 02, 09, 00, 0f, 01, 02, 01, 00, 02]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-14 13:51:24 +10:00
Number of expressions: 1
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(1)
coverage: Store all of a function's mappings in function coverage info Previously, mappings were attached to individual coverage statements in MIR. That necessitated special handling in MIR optimizations to avoid deleting those statements, since otherwise codegen would be unable to reassemble the original list of mappings. With this change, a function's list of mappings is now attached to its MIR body, and survives intact even if individual statements are deleted by optimizations.
2023-09-13 12:51:43 +10:00
Number of file 0 mappings: 4
Tweak various coverage test files for slightly nicer formatting For coverage tests, splitting code across multiple lines often makes the resulting coverage report easier to interpret, so we force rustfmt to retain line breaks by adding dummy line comments with `//`.
2024-05-29 14:06:53 +10:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 5, 1) to (start + 1, 20)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
- Code(Counter(1)) at (prev + 2, 9) to (start + 0, 16)
- Code(Expression(0, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 9) to (start + 0, 15)
= (c0 - c1)
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-14 13:51:24 +10:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 2, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
coverage: Include the highest counter ID seen in `.cov-map` dumps When making changes that have a large impact on coverage counter creation, this makes it easier to see whether the number of physical counters has changed. (The highest counter ID seen in coverage maps is not necessarily the same as the number of physical counters actually used by the instrumented code, but it's the best approximation we can get from looking only at the coverage maps, and it should be reasonably accurate in most cases.)
2024-10-08 13:13:05 +11:00
Highest counter ID seen: c1
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
Function name: try_error_result::main
Tweak various coverage test files for slightly nicer formatting For coverage tests, splitting code across multiple lines often makes the resulting coverage report easier to interpret, so we force rustfmt to retain line breaks by adding dummy line comments with `//`.
2024-05-29 14:06:53 +10:00
Raw bytes (26): 0x[01, 01, 01, 01, 05, 04, 01, 71, 01, 02, 0c, 05, 03, 05, 00, 06, 02, 02, 05, 00, 0b, 01, 01, 01, 00, 02]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-14 13:51:24 +10:00
Number of expressions: 1
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(1)
Number of file 0 mappings: 4
Tweak various coverage test files for slightly nicer formatting For coverage tests, splitting code across multiple lines often makes the resulting coverage report easier to interpret, so we force rustfmt to retain line breaks by adding dummy line comments with `//`.
2024-05-29 14:06:53 +10:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 113, 1) to (start + 2, 12)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
- Code(Counter(1)) at (prev + 3, 5) to (start + 0, 6)
- Code(Expression(0, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 5) to (start + 0, 11)
= (c0 - c1)
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-14 13:51:24 +10:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 1, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
coverage: Include the highest counter ID seen in `.cov-map` dumps When making changes that have a large impact on coverage counter creation, this makes it easier to see whether the number of physical counters has changed. (The highest counter ID seen in coverage maps is not necessarily the same as the number of physical counters actually used by the instrumented code, but it's the best approximation we can get from looking only at the coverage maps, and it should be reasonably accurate in most cases.)
2024-10-08 13:13:05 +11:00
Highest counter ID seen: c1
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
Function name: try_error_result::test1
coverage: Prefer to visit nodes whose predecessors have been visited
2024-12-05 18:57:17 +11:00
Raw bytes (69): 0x[01, 01, 05, 07, 09, 01, 00, 03, 0d, 03, 13, 0d, 11, 0b, 01, 0d, 01, 02, 17, 03, 07, 09, 00, 0e, 0a, 02, 09, 04, 1a, 11, 06, 0d, 00, 29, 15, 00, 29, 00, 2a, 00, 01, 0d, 00, 2a, 00, 00, 2a, 00, 2b, 0e, 04, 0d, 00, 2a, 00, 00, 2a, 00, 2b, 0d, 03, 05, 00, 0b, 01, 01, 01, 00, 02]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
coverage: Prefer to visit nodes whose predecessors have been visited
2024-12-05 18:57:17 +11:00
Number of expressions: 5
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Expression(1, Add), rhs = Counter(2)
- expression 1 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Zero
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
- expression 2 operands: lhs = Expression(0, Add), rhs = Counter(3)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
- expression 3 operands: lhs = Expression(0, Add), rhs = Expression(4, Add)
- expression 4 operands: lhs = Counter(3), rhs = Counter(4)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
Number of file 0 mappings: 11
coverage: Add `#[rustfmt::skip]` to tests with non-standard formatting These tests deliberately use non-standard formatting, so that the line execution counts reported by `llvm-cov` reveal additional information about where code regions begin and end.
2024-01-16 13:40:01 +11:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 13, 1) to (start + 2, 23)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
- Code(Expression(0, Add)) at (prev + 7, 9) to (start + 0, 14)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
= ((c0 + Zero) + c2)
- Code(Expression(2, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 9) to (start + 4, 26)
= (((c0 + Zero) + c2) - c3)
- Code(Counter(4)) at (prev + 6, 13) to (start + 0, 41)
- Code(Counter(5)) at (prev + 0, 41) to (start + 0, 42)
Enable by default.
2023-01-18 17:57:50 +00:00
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 1, 13) to (start + 0, 42)
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 0, 42) to (start + 0, 43)
- Code(Expression(3, Sub)) at (prev + 4, 13) to (start + 0, 42)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
= (((c0 + Zero) + c2) - (c3 + c4))
Enable by default.
2023-01-18 17:57:50 +00:00
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 0, 42) to (start + 0, 43)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
- Code(Counter(3)) at (prev + 3, 5) to (start + 0, 11)
coverage: Prefer to visit nodes whose predecessors have been visited
2024-12-05 18:57:17 +11:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 1, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
Highest counter ID seen: c5
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
Function name: try_error_result::test2
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
Raw bytes (355): 0x[01, 01, 3b, 07, 09, 01, 05, 03, 0d, 11, 15, 11, 4b, 15, 19, 11, 43, 47, 21, 4b, 1d, 15, 19, 11, 4b, 15, 19, 11, 47, 4b, 1d, 15, 19, 11, 43, 47, 21, 4b, 1d, 15, 19, 45, 5f, 25, 29, 45, 25, 45, 5f, 25, 29, 03, 8b, 01, 8f, 01, 31, 93, 01, 2d, 0d, 11, 03, 93, 01, 0d, 11, 03, 8f, 01, 93, 01, 2d, 0d, 11, 03, 8b, 01, 8f, 01, 31, 93, 01, 2d, 0d, 11, 49, a7, 01, 35, 39, 49, 35, 49, a7, 01, 35, 39, 4d, bb, 01, 3d, 41, 4d, 3d, 4d, bb, 01, 3d, 41, c3, 01, 41, c7, 01, 3d, cb, 01, 39, cf, 01, 35, d3, 01, 31, d7, 01, 2d, db, 01, 29, df, 01, 25, e3, 01, 21, e7, 01, 1d, eb, 01, 19, 0d, 15, 28, 01, 3d, 01, 03, 17, 03, 08, 09, 00, 0e, 0a, 02, 09, 04, 1a, 11, 06, 0d, 00, 2f, 15, 00, 2f, 00, 30, 0e, 00, 31, 03, 35, 19, 04, 11, 00, 12, 2a, 02, 11, 04, 12, 3e, 05, 11, 00, 14, 2a, 00, 17, 00, 41, 1d, 00, 41, 00, 42, 32, 00, 43, 00, 5f, 21, 00, 5f, 00, 60, 3e, 01, 0d, 00, 20, 5a, 01, 11, 00, 14, 45, 00, 17, 00, 41, 25, 00, 41, 00, 42, 56, 00, 43, 00, 60, 29, 00, 60, 00, 61, 5a, 01, 0d, 00, 20, 86, 01, 04, 11, 00, 14, 72, 00, 17, 00, 42, 2d, 00, 42, 00, 43, 7a, 00, 44, 00, 61, 31, 00, 61, 00, 62, 86, 01, 01, 0d, 00, 20, a2, 01, 01, 11, 00, 14, 49, 00, 17, 01, 36, 35, 01, 36, 00, 37, 9e, 01, 01, 12, 00, 2f, 39, 00, 2f, 00, 30, a2, 01, 01, 0d, 00, 20, b6, 01, 01, 11, 00, 14, 4d, 00, 17, 01, 36, 3d, 02, 11, 00, 12, b2, 01, 01, 12, 00, 2f, 41, 01, 11, 00, 12, b6, 01, 02, 0d, 00, 20, 0d, 03, 05, 00, 0b, bf, 01, 01, 01, 00, 02]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Create mapped places upon seeing them in the body.
2024-06-27 14:51:58 +00:00
Number of expressions: 59
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Expression(1, Add), rhs = Counter(2)
- expression 1 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(1)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
- expression 2 operands: lhs = Expression(0, Add), rhs = Counter(3)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
- expression 3 operands: lhs = Counter(4), rhs = Counter(5)
- expression 4 operands: lhs = Counter(4), rhs = Expression(18, Add)
- expression 5 operands: lhs = Counter(5), rhs = Counter(6)
- expression 6 operands: lhs = Counter(4), rhs = Expression(16, Add)
- expression 7 operands: lhs = Expression(17, Add), rhs = Counter(8)
- expression 8 operands: lhs = Expression(18, Add), rhs = Counter(7)
- expression 9 operands: lhs = Counter(5), rhs = Counter(6)
- expression 10 operands: lhs = Counter(4), rhs = Expression(18, Add)
- expression 11 operands: lhs = Counter(5), rhs = Counter(6)
- expression 12 operands: lhs = Counter(4), rhs = Expression(17, Add)
- expression 13 operands: lhs = Expression(18, Add), rhs = Counter(7)
- expression 14 operands: lhs = Counter(5), rhs = Counter(6)
- expression 15 operands: lhs = Counter(4), rhs = Expression(16, Add)
- expression 16 operands: lhs = Expression(17, Add), rhs = Counter(8)
- expression 17 operands: lhs = Expression(18, Add), rhs = Counter(7)
- expression 18 operands: lhs = Counter(5), rhs = Counter(6)
- expression 19 operands: lhs = Counter(17), rhs = Expression(23, Add)
- expression 20 operands: lhs = Counter(9), rhs = Counter(10)
- expression 21 operands: lhs = Counter(17), rhs = Counter(9)
- expression 22 operands: lhs = Counter(17), rhs = Expression(23, Add)
- expression 23 operands: lhs = Counter(9), rhs = Counter(10)
- expression 24 operands: lhs = Expression(0, Add), rhs = Expression(34, Add)
- expression 25 operands: lhs = Expression(35, Add), rhs = Counter(12)
- expression 26 operands: lhs = Expression(36, Add), rhs = Counter(11)
- expression 27 operands: lhs = Counter(3), rhs = Counter(4)
- expression 28 operands: lhs = Expression(0, Add), rhs = Expression(36, Add)
- expression 29 operands: lhs = Counter(3), rhs = Counter(4)
- expression 30 operands: lhs = Expression(0, Add), rhs = Expression(35, Add)
- expression 31 operands: lhs = Expression(36, Add), rhs = Counter(11)
- expression 32 operands: lhs = Counter(3), rhs = Counter(4)
- expression 33 operands: lhs = Expression(0, Add), rhs = Expression(34, Add)
- expression 34 operands: lhs = Expression(35, Add), rhs = Counter(12)
- expression 35 operands: lhs = Expression(36, Add), rhs = Counter(11)
- expression 36 operands: lhs = Counter(3), rhs = Counter(4)
- expression 37 operands: lhs = Counter(18), rhs = Expression(41, Add)
- expression 38 operands: lhs = Counter(13), rhs = Counter(14)
- expression 39 operands: lhs = Counter(18), rhs = Counter(13)
- expression 40 operands: lhs = Counter(18), rhs = Expression(41, Add)
- expression 41 operands: lhs = Counter(13), rhs = Counter(14)
- expression 42 operands: lhs = Counter(19), rhs = Expression(46, Add)
- expression 43 operands: lhs = Counter(15), rhs = Counter(16)
- expression 44 operands: lhs = Counter(19), rhs = Counter(15)
- expression 45 operands: lhs = Counter(19), rhs = Expression(46, Add)
- expression 46 operands: lhs = Counter(15), rhs = Counter(16)
- expression 47 operands: lhs = Expression(48, Add), rhs = Counter(16)
- expression 48 operands: lhs = Expression(49, Add), rhs = Counter(15)
- expression 49 operands: lhs = Expression(50, Add), rhs = Counter(14)
- expression 50 operands: lhs = Expression(51, Add), rhs = Counter(13)
- expression 51 operands: lhs = Expression(52, Add), rhs = Counter(12)
- expression 52 operands: lhs = Expression(53, Add), rhs = Counter(11)
- expression 53 operands: lhs = Expression(54, Add), rhs = Counter(10)
- expression 54 operands: lhs = Expression(55, Add), rhs = Counter(9)
- expression 55 operands: lhs = Expression(56, Add), rhs = Counter(8)
- expression 56 operands: lhs = Expression(57, Add), rhs = Counter(7)
- expression 57 operands: lhs = Expression(58, Add), rhs = Counter(6)
- expression 58 operands: lhs = Counter(3), rhs = Counter(5)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
Number of file 0 mappings: 40
Tweak various coverage test files for slightly nicer formatting For coverage tests, splitting code across multiple lines often makes the resulting coverage report easier to interpret, so we force rustfmt to retain line breaks by adding dummy line comments with `//`.
2024-05-29 14:06:53 +10:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 61, 1) to (start + 3, 23)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
- Code(Expression(0, Add)) at (prev + 8, 9) to (start + 0, 14)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
= ((c0 + c1) + c2)
- Code(Expression(2, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 9) to (start + 4, 26)
= (((c0 + c1) + c2) - c3)
- Code(Counter(4)) at (prev + 6, 13) to (start + 0, 47)
- Code(Counter(5)) at (prev + 0, 47) to (start + 0, 48)
- Code(Expression(3, Sub)) at (prev + 0, 49) to (start + 3, 53)
= (c4 - c5)
- Code(Counter(6)) at (prev + 4, 17) to (start + 0, 18)
- Code(Expression(10, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 17) to (start + 4, 18)
= (c4 - (c5 + c6))
Create mapped places upon seeing them in the body.
2024-06-27 14:51:58 +00:00
- Code(Expression(15, Sub)) at (prev + 5, 17) to (start + 0, 20)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
= (c4 - (((c5 + c6) + c7) + c8))
- Code(Expression(10, Sub)) at (prev + 0, 23) to (start + 0, 65)
= (c4 - (c5 + c6))
- Code(Counter(7)) at (prev + 0, 65) to (start + 0, 66)
- Code(Expression(12, Sub)) at (prev + 0, 67) to (start + 0, 95)
= (c4 - ((c5 + c6) + c7))
- Code(Counter(8)) at (prev + 0, 95) to (start + 0, 96)
Create mapped places upon seeing them in the body.
2024-06-27 14:51:58 +00:00
- Code(Expression(15, Sub)) at (prev + 1, 13) to (start + 0, 32)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
= (c4 - (((c5 + c6) + c7) + c8))
Create mapped places upon seeing them in the body.
2024-06-27 14:51:58 +00:00
- Code(Expression(22, Sub)) at (prev + 1, 17) to (start + 0, 20)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
= (c17 - (c9 + c10))
- Code(Counter(17)) at (prev + 0, 23) to (start + 0, 65)
- Code(Counter(9)) at (prev + 0, 65) to (start + 0, 66)
- Code(Expression(21, Sub)) at (prev + 0, 67) to (start + 0, 96)
= (c17 - c9)
- Code(Counter(10)) at (prev + 0, 96) to (start + 0, 97)
Create mapped places upon seeing them in the body.
2024-06-27 14:51:58 +00:00
- Code(Expression(22, Sub)) at (prev + 1, 13) to (start + 0, 32)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
= (c17 - (c9 + c10))
Create mapped places upon seeing them in the body.
2024-06-27 14:51:58 +00:00
- Code(Expression(33, Sub)) at (prev + 4, 17) to (start + 0, 20)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
= (((c0 + c1) + c2) - (((c3 + c4) + c11) + c12))
- Code(Expression(28, Sub)) at (prev + 0, 23) to (start + 0, 66)
= (((c0 + c1) + c2) - (c3 + c4))
- Code(Counter(11)) at (prev + 0, 66) to (start + 0, 67)
- Code(Expression(30, Sub)) at (prev + 0, 68) to (start + 0, 97)
= (((c0 + c1) + c2) - ((c3 + c4) + c11))
- Code(Counter(12)) at (prev + 0, 97) to (start + 0, 98)
Create mapped places upon seeing them in the body.
2024-06-27 14:51:58 +00:00
- Code(Expression(33, Sub)) at (prev + 1, 13) to (start + 0, 32)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
= (((c0 + c1) + c2) - (((c3 + c4) + c11) + c12))
Create mapped places upon seeing them in the body.
2024-06-27 14:51:58 +00:00
- Code(Expression(40, Sub)) at (prev + 1, 17) to (start + 0, 20)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
= (c18 - (c13 + c14))
- Code(Counter(18)) at (prev + 0, 23) to (start + 1, 54)
- Code(Counter(13)) at (prev + 1, 54) to (start + 0, 55)
- Code(Expression(39, Sub)) at (prev + 1, 18) to (start + 0, 47)
= (c18 - c13)
- Code(Counter(14)) at (prev + 0, 47) to (start + 0, 48)
Create mapped places upon seeing them in the body.
2024-06-27 14:51:58 +00:00
- Code(Expression(40, Sub)) at (prev + 1, 13) to (start + 0, 32)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
= (c18 - (c13 + c14))
Create mapped places upon seeing them in the body.
2024-06-27 14:51:58 +00:00
- Code(Expression(45, Sub)) at (prev + 1, 17) to (start + 0, 20)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
= (c19 - (c15 + c16))
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
- Code(Counter(19)) at (prev + 0, 23) to (start + 1, 54)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
- Code(Counter(15)) at (prev + 2, 17) to (start + 0, 18)
- Code(Expression(44, Sub)) at (prev + 1, 18) to (start + 0, 47)
= (c19 - c15)
- Code(Counter(16)) at (prev + 1, 17) to (start + 0, 18)
Create mapped places upon seeing them in the body.
2024-06-27 14:51:58 +00:00
- Code(Expression(45, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 13) to (start + 0, 32)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
= (c19 - (c15 + c16))
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
- Code(Counter(3)) at (prev + 3, 5) to (start + 0, 11)
Create mapped places upon seeing them in the body.
2024-06-27 14:51:58 +00:00
- Code(Expression(47, Add)) at (prev + 1, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
coverage: Add an extra "transcribe" step after counter creation
2024-11-29 12:58:35 +11:00
= ((((((((((((c3 + c5) + c6) + c7) + c8) + c9) + c10) + c11) + c12) + c13) + c14) + c15) + c16)
coverage: Include the highest counter ID seen in `.cov-map` dumps When making changes that have a large impact on coverage counter creation, this makes it easier to see whether the number of physical counters has changed. (The highest counter ID seen in coverage maps is not necessarily the same as the number of physical counters actually used by the instrumented code, but it's the best approximation we can get from looking only at the coverage maps, and it should be reasonably accurate in most cases.)
2024-10-08 13:13:05 +11:00
Highest counter ID seen: c19
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 21:29:41 +10:00
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink