rust/compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift/patches/0027-stdlib-128bit-atomic-operations.patch

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

88 lines
3.6 KiB
Diff
Raw Normal View History

From 5d7c709608b01301d4628d2159265936d4440b67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: bjorn3 <bjorn3@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:45:28 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Disable 128bit atomic operations
Cranelift doesn't support them yet
---
library/core/src/panic/unwind_safe.rs | 6 -----
library/core/src/sync/atomic.rs | 38 ---------------------------
2 files changed, 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/library/core/src/panic/unwind_safe.rs b/library/core/src/panic/unwind_safe.rs
index a60f0799c0e..af056fbf41f 100644
--- a/library/core/src/panic/unwind_safe.rs
+++ b/library/core/src/panic/unwind_safe.rs
@@ -216,9 +216,6 @@ impl RefUnwindSafe for crate::sync::atomic::AtomicI32 {}
#[cfg(target_has_atomic_load_store = "64")]
#[stable(feature = "integer_atomics_stable", since = "1.34.0")]
impl RefUnwindSafe for crate::sync::atomic::AtomicI64 {}
-#[cfg(target_has_atomic_load_store = "128")]
-#[unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069")]
-impl RefUnwindSafe for crate::sync::atomic::AtomicI128 {}
#[cfg(target_has_atomic_load_store = "ptr")]
#[stable(feature = "unwind_safe_atomic_refs", since = "1.14.0")]
@@ -235,9 +232,6 @@ impl RefUnwindSafe for crate::sync::atomic::AtomicU32 {}
#[cfg(target_has_atomic_load_store = "64")]
#[stable(feature = "integer_atomics_stable", since = "1.34.0")]
impl RefUnwindSafe for crate::sync::atomic::AtomicU64 {}
-#[cfg(target_has_atomic_load_store = "128")]
-#[unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069")]
-impl RefUnwindSafe for crate::sync::atomic::AtomicU128 {}
#[cfg(target_has_atomic_load_store = "8")]
#[stable(feature = "unwind_safe_atomic_refs", since = "1.14.0")]
diff --git a/library/core/src/sync/atomic.rs b/library/core/src/sync/atomic.rs
index bf2b6d59f88..d5ccce03bbf 100644
--- a/library/core/src/sync/atomic.rs
+++ b/library/core/src/sync/atomic.rs
@@ -3585,44 +3585,6 @@ pub const fn as_ptr(&self) -> *mut $int_type {
8,
u64 AtomicU64
}
-#[cfg(target_has_atomic_load_store = "128")]
-atomic_int! {
- cfg(target_has_atomic = "128"),
- cfg(target_has_atomic_equal_alignment = "128"),
- unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069"),
- unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069"),
- unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069"),
- unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069"),
- unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069"),
- unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069"),
Re-do recursive const stability checks Fundamentally, we have *three* disjoint categories of functions: 1. const-stable functions 2. private/unstable functions that are meant to be callable from const-stable functions 3. functions that can make use of unstable const features This PR implements the following system: - `#[rustc_const_stable]` puts functions in the first category. It may only be applied to `#[stable]` functions. - `#[rustc_const_unstable]` by default puts functions in the third category. The new attribute `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` can be added to such a function to move it into the second category. - `const fn` without a const stability marker are in the second category if they are still unstable. They automatically inherit the feature gate for regular calls, it can now also be used for const-calls. Also, several holes in recursive const stability checking are being closed. There's still one potential hole that is hard to avoid, which is when MIR building automatically inserts calls to a particular function in stable functions -- which happens in the panic machinery. Those need to *not* be `rustc_const_unstable` (or manually get a `rustc_const_stable_indirect`) to be sure they follow recursive const stability. But that's a fairly rare and special case so IMO it's fine. The net effect of this is that a `#[unstable]` or unmarked function can be constified simply by marking it as `const fn`, and it will then be const-callable from stable `const fn` and subject to recursive const stability requirements. If it is publicly reachable (which implies it cannot be unmarked), it will be const-unstable under the same feature gate. Only if the function ever becomes `#[stable]` does it need a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` or `#[rustc_const_stable]` marker to decide if this should also imply const-stability. Adding `#[rustc_const_unstable]` is only needed for (a) functions that need to use unstable const lang features (including intrinsics), or (b) `#[stable]` functions that are not yet intended to be const-stable. Adding `#[rustc_const_stable]` is only needed for functions that are actually meant to be directly callable from stable const code. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` is used to mark intrinsics as const-callable and for `#[rustc_const_unstable]` functions that are actually called from other, exposed-on-stable `const fn`. No other attributes are required.
2024-10-06 19:59:19 +02:00
- rustc_const_unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069"),
- rustc_const_unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069"),
- rustc_diagnostic_item = "AtomicI128",
- "i128",
- "#![feature(integer_atomics)]\n\n",
- atomic_min, atomic_max,
- 16,
- i128 AtomicI128
-}
-#[cfg(target_has_atomic_load_store = "128")]
-atomic_int! {
- cfg(target_has_atomic = "128"),
- cfg(target_has_atomic_equal_alignment = "128"),
- unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069"),
- unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069"),
- unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069"),
- unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069"),
- unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069"),
- unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069"),
Re-do recursive const stability checks Fundamentally, we have *three* disjoint categories of functions: 1. const-stable functions 2. private/unstable functions that are meant to be callable from const-stable functions 3. functions that can make use of unstable const features This PR implements the following system: - `#[rustc_const_stable]` puts functions in the first category. It may only be applied to `#[stable]` functions. - `#[rustc_const_unstable]` by default puts functions in the third category. The new attribute `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` can be added to such a function to move it into the second category. - `const fn` without a const stability marker are in the second category if they are still unstable. They automatically inherit the feature gate for regular calls, it can now also be used for const-calls. Also, several holes in recursive const stability checking are being closed. There's still one potential hole that is hard to avoid, which is when MIR building automatically inserts calls to a particular function in stable functions -- which happens in the panic machinery. Those need to *not* be `rustc_const_unstable` (or manually get a `rustc_const_stable_indirect`) to be sure they follow recursive const stability. But that's a fairly rare and special case so IMO it's fine. The net effect of this is that a `#[unstable]` or unmarked function can be constified simply by marking it as `const fn`, and it will then be const-callable from stable `const fn` and subject to recursive const stability requirements. If it is publicly reachable (which implies it cannot be unmarked), it will be const-unstable under the same feature gate. Only if the function ever becomes `#[stable]` does it need a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` or `#[rustc_const_stable]` marker to decide if this should also imply const-stability. Adding `#[rustc_const_unstable]` is only needed for (a) functions that need to use unstable const lang features (including intrinsics), or (b) `#[stable]` functions that are not yet intended to be const-stable. Adding `#[rustc_const_stable]` is only needed for functions that are actually meant to be directly callable from stable const code. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` is used to mark intrinsics as const-callable and for `#[rustc_const_unstable]` functions that are actually called from other, exposed-on-stable `const fn`. No other attributes are required.
2024-10-06 19:59:19 +02:00
- rustc_const_unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069"),
- rustc_const_unstable(feature = "integer_atomics", issue = "99069"),
- rustc_diagnostic_item = "AtomicU128",
- "u128",
- "#![feature(integer_atomics)]\n\n",
- atomic_umin, atomic_umax,
- 16,
- u128 AtomicU128
-}
#[cfg(target_has_atomic_load_store = "ptr")]
macro_rules! atomic_int_ptr_sized {
--
2.48.1