rust/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/dataflow.rs

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

631 lines
24 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

#![deny(rustc::untranslatable_diagnostic)]
#![deny(rustc::diagnostic_outside_of_impl)]
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxIndexMap;
use rustc_data_structures::graph::WithSuccessors;
use rustc_index::bit_set::BitSet;
use rustc_middle::mir::{
2023-05-27 16:27:04 +00:00
self, BasicBlock, Body, CallReturnPlaces, Location, Place, TerminatorEdges,
};
use rustc_middle::ty::RegionVid;
use rustc_middle::ty::TyCtxt;
use rustc_mir_dataflow::impls::{EverInitializedPlaces, MaybeUninitializedPlaces};
use rustc_mir_dataflow::ResultsVisitable;
use rustc_mir_dataflow::{self, fmt::DebugWithContext, GenKill};
use rustc_mir_dataflow::{Analysis, Direction, Results};
use std::fmt;
use crate::{places_conflict, BorrowSet, PlaceConflictBias, PlaceExt, RegionInferenceContext};
/// A tuple with named fields that can hold either the results or the transient state of the
/// dataflow analyses used by the borrow checker.
#[derive(Debug)]
pub struct BorrowckAnalyses<B, U, E> {
pub borrows: B,
pub uninits: U,
pub ever_inits: E,
}
/// The results of the dataflow analyses used by the borrow checker.
pub type BorrowckResults<'mir, 'tcx> = BorrowckAnalyses<
Results<'tcx, Borrows<'mir, 'tcx>>,
Results<'tcx, MaybeUninitializedPlaces<'mir, 'tcx>>,
Results<'tcx, EverInitializedPlaces<'mir, 'tcx>>,
>;
/// The transient state of the dataflow analyses used by the borrow checker.
pub type BorrowckFlowState<'mir, 'tcx> =
<BorrowckResults<'mir, 'tcx> as ResultsVisitable<'tcx>>::FlowState;
macro_rules! impl_visitable {
( $(
$T:ident { $( $field:ident : $A:ident ),* $(,)? }
)* ) => { $(
impl<'tcx, $($A),*, D: Direction> ResultsVisitable<'tcx> for $T<$( Results<'tcx, $A> ),*>
where
$( $A: Analysis<'tcx, Direction = D>, )*
{
type Direction = D;
type FlowState = $T<$( $A::Domain ),*>;
fn new_flow_state(&self, body: &mir::Body<'tcx>) -> Self::FlowState {
$T {
$( $field: self.$field.analysis.bottom_value(body) ),*
}
}
fn reset_to_block_entry(
&self,
state: &mut Self::FlowState,
block: BasicBlock,
) {
$( state.$field.clone_from(&self.$field.entry_set_for_block(block)); )*
}
fn reconstruct_before_statement_effect(
&mut self,
state: &mut Self::FlowState,
stmt: &mir::Statement<'tcx>,
loc: Location,
) {
$( self.$field.analysis
.apply_before_statement_effect(&mut state.$field, stmt, loc); )*
}
fn reconstruct_statement_effect(
&mut self,
state: &mut Self::FlowState,
stmt: &mir::Statement<'tcx>,
loc: Location,
) {
$( self.$field.analysis
.apply_statement_effect(&mut state.$field, stmt, loc); )*
}
fn reconstruct_before_terminator_effect(
&mut self,
state: &mut Self::FlowState,
term: &mir::Terminator<'tcx>,
loc: Location,
) {
$( self.$field.analysis
.apply_before_terminator_effect(&mut state.$field, term, loc); )*
}
fn reconstruct_terminator_effect(
&mut self,
state: &mut Self::FlowState,
term: &mir::Terminator<'tcx>,
loc: Location,
) {
$( self.$field.analysis
.apply_terminator_effect(&mut state.$field, term, loc); )*
}
}
)* }
}
impl_visitable! {
BorrowckAnalyses { borrows: B, uninits: U, ever_inits: E }
}
rustc_index::newtype_index! {
#[debug_format = "bw{}"]
pub struct BorrowIndex {}
}
2017-12-13 01:06:39 -06:00
/// `Borrows` stores the data used in the analyses that track the flow
/// of borrows.
///
/// It uniquely identifies every borrow (`Rvalue::Ref`) by a
/// `BorrowIndex`, and maps each such index to a `BorrowData`
/// describing the borrow. These indexes are used for representing the
/// borrows in compact bitvectors.
pub struct Borrows<'a, 'tcx> {
2019-06-14 00:48:52 +03:00
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
body: &'a Body<'tcx>,
2017-12-13 01:06:39 -06:00
2021-02-07 22:32:50 +01:00
borrow_set: &'a BorrowSet<'tcx>,
borrows_out_of_scope_at_location: FxIndexMap<Location, Vec<BorrowIndex>>,
}
struct OutOfScopePrecomputer<'a, 'tcx> {
visited: BitSet<mir::BasicBlock>,
2023-05-19 12:56:09 +00:00
visit_stack: Vec<mir::BasicBlock>,
body: &'a Body<'tcx>,
2021-02-07 22:32:50 +01:00
regioncx: &'a RegionInferenceContext<'tcx>,
borrows_out_of_scope_at_location: FxIndexMap<Location, Vec<BorrowIndex>>,
}
impl<'a, 'tcx> OutOfScopePrecomputer<'a, 'tcx> {
2021-02-07 22:32:50 +01:00
fn new(body: &'a Body<'tcx>, regioncx: &'a RegionInferenceContext<'tcx>) -> Self {
OutOfScopePrecomputer {
visited: BitSet::new_empty(body.basic_blocks.len()),
visit_stack: vec![],
body,
regioncx,
borrows_out_of_scope_at_location: FxIndexMap::default(),
}
}
}
impl<'tcx> OutOfScopePrecomputer<'_, 'tcx> {
fn precompute_borrows_out_of_scope(
&mut self,
borrow_index: BorrowIndex,
borrow_region: RegionVid,
first_location: Location,
) {
let first_block = first_location.block;
2023-05-19 12:56:09 +00:00
let first_bb_data = &self.body.basic_blocks[first_block];
// This is the first block, we only want to visit it from the creation of the borrow at
// `first_location`.
let first_lo = first_location.statement_index;
let first_hi = first_bb_data.statements.len();
if let Some(kill_stmt) = self.regioncx.first_non_contained_inclusive(
borrow_region,
first_block,
first_lo,
first_hi,
) {
let kill_location = Location { block: first_block, statement_index: kill_stmt };
// If region does not contain a point at the location, then add to list and skip
// successor locations.
debug!("borrow {:?} gets killed at {:?}", borrow_index, kill_location);
self.borrows_out_of_scope_at_location
.entry(kill_location)
.or_default()
.push(borrow_index);
// The borrow is already dead, there is no need to visit other blocks.
return;
}
2023-05-19 12:56:09 +00:00
// The borrow is not dead. Add successor BBs to the work list, if necessary.
for succ_bb in first_bb_data.terminator().successors() {
if self.visited.insert(succ_bb) {
self.visit_stack.push(succ_bb);
}
}
2023-05-19 12:56:09 +00:00
// We may end up visiting `first_block` again. This is not an issue: we know at this point
// that it does not kill the borrow in the `first_lo..=first_hi` range, so checking the
// `0..first_lo` range and the `0..first_hi` range give the same result.
while let Some(block) = self.visit_stack.pop() {
let bb_data = &self.body[block];
let num_stmts = bb_data.statements.len();
if let Some(kill_stmt) =
2023-05-19 12:56:09 +00:00
self.regioncx.first_non_contained_inclusive(borrow_region, block, 0, num_stmts)
{
2023-05-19 12:56:09 +00:00
let kill_location = Location { block, statement_index: kill_stmt };
// If region does not contain a point at the location, then add to list and skip
// successor locations.
debug!("borrow {:?} gets killed at {:?}", borrow_index, kill_location);
self.borrows_out_of_scope_at_location
.entry(kill_location)
.or_default()
.push(borrow_index);
2023-05-19 12:56:09 +00:00
// We killed the borrow, so we do not visit this block's successors.
continue;
}
// Add successor BBs to the work list, if necessary.
for succ_bb in bb_data.terminator().successors() {
2023-05-19 12:56:09 +00:00
if self.visited.insert(succ_bb) {
self.visit_stack.push(succ_bb);
}
}
}
self.visited.clear();
}
New `ActiveBorrows` dataflow for two-phase `&mut`; not yet borrowed-checked. High-level picture: The old `Borrows` analysis is now called `Reservations` (implemented as a newtype wrapper around `Borrows`); this continues to compute whether a `Rvalue::Ref` can reach a statement without an intervening `EndRegion`. In addition, we also track what `Place` each such `Rvalue::Ref` was immediately assigned to in a given borrow (yay for MIR-structural properties!). The new `ActiveBorrows` analysis then tracks the initial use of any of those assigned `Places` for a given borrow. I.e. a borrow becomes "active" immediately after it starts being "used" in some way. (This is conservative in the sense that we will treat a copy `x = y;` as a use of `y`; in principle one might further delay activation in such cases.) The new `ActiveBorrows` analysis needs to take the `Reservations` results as an initial input, because the reservation state influences the gen/kill sets for `ActiveBorrows`. In particular, a use of `a` activates a borrow `a = &b` if and only if there exists a path (in the control flow graph) from the borrow to that use. So we need to know if the borrow reaches a given use to know if it really gets a gen-bit or not. * Incorporating the output from one dataflow analysis into the input of another required more changes to the infrastructure than I had expected, and even after those changes, the resulting code is still a bit subtle. * In particular, Since we need to know the intrablock reservation state, we need to dynamically update a bitvector for the reservations as we are also trying to compute the gen/kills bitvector for the active borrows. * The way I ended up deciding to do this (after also toying with at least two other designs) is to put both the reservation state and the active borrow state into a single bitvector. That is why we now have separate (but related) `BorrowIndex` and `ReserveOrActivateIndex`: each borrow index maps to a pair of neighboring reservation and activation indexes. As noted above, these changes are solely adding the active borrows dataflow analysis (and updating the existing code to cope with the switch from `Borrows` to `Reservations`). The code to process the bitvector in the borrow checker currently just skips over all of the active borrow bits. But atop this commit, one *can* observe the analysis results by looking at the graphviz output, e.g. via ```rust #[rustc_mir(borrowck_graphviz_preflow="pre_two_phase.dot", borrowck_graphviz_postflow="post_two_phase.dot")] ``` Includes doc for `FindPlaceUses`, as well as `Reservations` and `ActiveBorrows` structs, which are wrappers are the `Borrows` struct that dictate which flow analysis should be performed.
2017-12-01 12:32:51 +01:00
}
2023-06-30 19:11:09 +00:00
// This is `pub` because it's used by unstable external borrowck data users, see `consumers.rs`.
pub fn calculate_borrows_out_of_scope_at_location<'tcx>(
body: &Body<'tcx>,
regioncx: &RegionInferenceContext<'tcx>,
borrow_set: &BorrowSet<'tcx>,
) -> FxIndexMap<Location, Vec<BorrowIndex>> {
let mut prec = OutOfScopePrecomputer::new(body, regioncx);
for (borrow_index, borrow_data) in borrow_set.iter_enumerated() {
let borrow_region = borrow_data.region;
let location = borrow_data.reserve_location;
prec.precompute_borrows_out_of_scope(borrow_index, borrow_region, location);
}
prec.borrows_out_of_scope_at_location
}
struct PoloniusOutOfScopePrecomputer<'a, 'tcx> {
visited: BitSet<mir::BasicBlock>,
visit_stack: Vec<mir::BasicBlock>,
body: &'a Body<'tcx>,
regioncx: &'a RegionInferenceContext<'tcx>,
loans_out_of_scope_at_location: FxIndexMap<Location, Vec<BorrowIndex>>,
}
impl<'a, 'tcx> PoloniusOutOfScopePrecomputer<'a, 'tcx> {
fn new(body: &'a Body<'tcx>, regioncx: &'a RegionInferenceContext<'tcx>) -> Self {
Self {
visited: BitSet::new_empty(body.basic_blocks.len()),
visit_stack: vec![],
body,
regioncx,
loans_out_of_scope_at_location: FxIndexMap::default(),
}
}
}
impl<'tcx> PoloniusOutOfScopePrecomputer<'_, 'tcx> {
/// Loans are in scope while they are live: whether they are contained within any live region.
/// In the location-insensitive analysis, a loan will be contained in a region if the issuing
/// region can reach it in the subset graph. So this is a reachability problem.
fn precompute_loans_out_of_scope(
&mut self,
loan_idx: BorrowIndex,
issuing_region: RegionVid,
loan_issued_at: Location,
) {
let sccs = self.regioncx.constraint_sccs();
let issuing_region_scc = sccs.scc(issuing_region);
// We first handle the cases where the loan doesn't go out of scope, depending on the issuing
// region's successors.
for scc in sccs.depth_first_search(issuing_region_scc) {
// 1. Via member constraints
//
// The issuing region can flow into the choice regions, and they are either:
// - placeholders or free regions themselves,
// - or also transitively outlive a free region.
//
// That is to say, if there are member constraints here, the loan escapes the function
// and cannot go out of scope. We can early return.
if self.regioncx.scc_has_member_constraints(scc) {
return;
}
// 2. Via regions that are live at all points: placeholders and free regions.
//
// If the issuing region outlives such a region, its loan escapes the function and
// cannot go out of scope. We can early return.
if self.regioncx.scc_is_live_at_all_points(scc) {
return;
}
}
let first_block = loan_issued_at.block;
let first_bb_data = &self.body.basic_blocks[first_block];
// The first block we visit is the one where the loan is issued, starting from the statement
// where the loan is issued: at `loan_issued_at`.
let first_lo = loan_issued_at.statement_index;
let first_hi = first_bb_data.statements.len();
if let Some(kill_location) =
self.loan_kill_location(loan_idx, loan_issued_at, first_block, first_lo, first_hi)
{
debug!("loan {:?} gets killed at {:?}", loan_idx, kill_location);
self.loans_out_of_scope_at_location.entry(kill_location).or_default().push(loan_idx);
// The loan dies within the first block, we're done and can early return.
return;
}
// The loan is not dead. Add successor BBs to the work list, if necessary.
for succ_bb in first_bb_data.terminator().successors() {
if self.visited.insert(succ_bb) {
self.visit_stack.push(succ_bb);
}
}
// We may end up visiting `first_block` again. This is not an issue: we know at this point
// that the loan is not killed in the `first_lo..=first_hi` range, so checking the
// `0..first_lo` range and the `0..first_hi` range gives the same result.
while let Some(block) = self.visit_stack.pop() {
let bb_data = &self.body[block];
let num_stmts = bb_data.statements.len();
if let Some(kill_location) =
self.loan_kill_location(loan_idx, loan_issued_at, block, 0, num_stmts)
{
debug!("loan {:?} gets killed at {:?}", loan_idx, kill_location);
self.loans_out_of_scope_at_location
.entry(kill_location)
.or_default()
.push(loan_idx);
// The loan dies within this block, so we don't need to visit its successors.
continue;
}
// Add successor BBs to the work list, if necessary.
for succ_bb in bb_data.terminator().successors() {
if self.visited.insert(succ_bb) {
self.visit_stack.push(succ_bb);
}
}
}
self.visited.clear();
assert!(self.visit_stack.is_empty(), "visit stack should be empty");
}
/// Returns the lowest statement in `start..=end`, where the loan goes out of scope, if any.
/// This is the statement where the issuing region can't reach any of the regions that are live
/// at this point.
fn loan_kill_location(
&self,
loan_idx: BorrowIndex,
loan_issued_at: Location,
block: BasicBlock,
start: usize,
end: usize,
) -> Option<Location> {
for statement_index in start..=end {
let location = Location { block, statement_index };
// Check whether the issuing region can reach local regions that are live at this point:
// - a loan is always live at its issuing location because it can reach the issuing
// region, which is always live at this location.
if location == loan_issued_at {
continue;
}
// - the loan goes out of scope at `location` if it's not contained within any regions
// live at this point.
//
// FIXME: if the issuing region `i` can reach a live region `r` at point `p`, and `r` is
// live at point `q`, then it's guaranteed that `i` would reach `r` at point `q`.
// Reachability is location-insensitive, and we could take advantage of that, by jumping
// to a further point than just the next statement: we can jump to the furthest point
// within the block where `r` is live.
if self.regioncx.is_loan_live_at(loan_idx, location) {
continue;
}
// No live region is reachable from the issuing region: the loan is killed at this
// point.
return Some(location);
}
None
}
}
2019-06-14 00:48:52 +03:00
impl<'a, 'tcx> Borrows<'a, 'tcx> {
pub fn new(
2019-06-14 00:48:52 +03:00
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
body: &'a Body<'tcx>,
2023-06-23 23:42:48 +00:00
regioncx: &'a RegionInferenceContext<'tcx>,
2021-02-07 22:32:50 +01:00
borrow_set: &'a BorrowSet<'tcx>,
) -> Self {
let mut borrows_out_of_scope_at_location =
2023-06-23 23:42:48 +00:00
calculate_borrows_out_of_scope_at_location(body, regioncx, borrow_set);
// The in-tree polonius analysis computes loans going out of scope using the set-of-loans
// model, and makes sure they're identical to the existing computation of the set-of-points
// model.
if tcx.sess.opts.unstable_opts.polonius.is_next_enabled() {
let mut polonius_prec = PoloniusOutOfScopePrecomputer::new(body, regioncx);
for (loan_idx, loan_data) in borrow_set.iter_enumerated() {
let issuing_region = loan_data.region;
let issued_location = loan_data.reserve_location;
polonius_prec.precompute_loans_out_of_scope(
loan_idx,
issuing_region,
issued_location,
);
}
assert_eq!(
borrows_out_of_scope_at_location, polonius_prec.loans_out_of_scope_at_location,
"the loans out of scope must be the same as the borrows out of scope"
);
borrows_out_of_scope_at_location = polonius_prec.loans_out_of_scope_at_location;
}
Borrows { tcx, body, borrow_set, borrows_out_of_scope_at_location }
2018-03-05 02:44:10 -05:00
}
pub fn location(&self, idx: BorrowIndex) -> &Location {
2020-08-07 20:47:33 -07:00
&self.borrow_set[idx].reserve_location
}
2017-10-30 08:28:07 -04:00
/// Add all borrows to the kill set, if those borrows are out of scope at `location`.
/// That means they went out of a nonlexical scope
2017-10-30 08:28:07 -04:00
fn kill_loans_out_of_scope_at_location(
&self,
trans: &mut impl GenKill<BorrowIndex>,
2018-03-05 02:44:10 -05:00
location: Location,
) {
// NOTE: The state associated with a given `location`
// reflects the dataflow on entry to the statement.
// Iterate over each of the borrows that we've precomputed
// to have went out of scope at this location and kill them.
//
// We are careful always to call this function *before* we
// set up the gen-bits for the statement or
2020-10-28 19:31:16 +01:00
// terminator. That way, if the effect of the statement or
// terminator *does* introduce a new loan of the same
// region, then setting that gen-bit will override any
// potential kill introduced here.
if let Some(indices) = self.borrows_out_of_scope_at_location.get(&location) {
trans.kill_all(indices.iter().copied());
2017-10-30 08:28:07 -04:00
}
}
/// Kill any borrows that conflict with `place`.
2020-03-30 17:49:33 -03:00
fn kill_borrows_on_place(&self, trans: &mut impl GenKill<BorrowIndex>, place: Place<'tcx>) {
debug!("kill_borrows_on_place: place={:?}", place);
let other_borrows_of_local = self
.borrow_set
.local_map
.get(&place.local)
.into_iter()
.flat_map(|bs| bs.iter())
.copied();
// If the borrowed place is a local with no projections, all other borrows of this
// local must conflict. This is purely an optimization so we don't have to call
// `places_conflict` for every borrow.
if place.projection.is_empty() {
if !self.body.local_decls[place.local].is_ref_to_static() {
trans.kill_all(other_borrows_of_local);
2019-12-11 10:39:24 -03:00
}
return;
2018-03-05 02:44:10 -05:00
}
// By passing `PlaceConflictBias::NoOverlap`, we conservatively assume that any given
2023-03-15 23:55:48 +05:30
// pair of array indices are not equal, so that when `places_conflict` returns true, we
// will be assured that two places being compared definitely denotes the same sets of
// locations.
let definitely_conflicting_borrows = other_borrows_of_local.filter(|&i| {
places_conflict(
self.tcx,
self.body,
2020-08-07 20:47:33 -07:00
self.borrow_set[i].borrowed_place,
place,
PlaceConflictBias::NoOverlap,
)
});
trans.kill_all(definitely_conflicting_borrows);
2018-03-05 02:44:10 -05:00
}
}
impl<'tcx> rustc_mir_dataflow::AnalysisDomain<'tcx> for Borrows<'_, 'tcx> {
type Domain = BitSet<BorrowIndex>;
const NAME: &'static str = "borrows";
fn bottom_value(&self, _: &mir::Body<'tcx>) -> Self::Domain {
// bottom = nothing is reserved or activated yet;
BitSet::new_empty(self.borrow_set.len())
2018-03-05 02:44:10 -05:00
}
fn initialize_start_block(&self, _: &mir::Body<'tcx>, _: &mut Self::Domain) {
2018-03-05 02:44:10 -05:00
// no borrows of code region_scopes have been taken prior to
// function execution, so this method has no effect.
2018-03-05 02:44:10 -05:00
}
}
2018-03-05 02:44:10 -05:00
2023-06-30 12:21:50 +00:00
/// Forward dataflow computation of the set of borrows that are in scope at a particular location.
/// - we gen the introduced loans
/// - we kill loans on locals going out of (regular) scope
/// - we kill the loans going out of their region's NLL scope: in NLL terms, the frontier where a
/// region stops containing the CFG points reachable from the issuing location.
/// - we also kill loans of conflicting places when overwriting a shared path: e.g. borrows of
/// `a.b.c` when `a` is overwritten.
impl<'tcx> rustc_mir_dataflow::GenKillAnalysis<'tcx> for Borrows<'_, 'tcx> {
type Idx = BorrowIndex;
2023-05-06 22:00:24 +00:00
fn domain_size(&self, _: &mir::Body<'tcx>) -> usize {
self.borrow_set.len()
}
fn before_statement_effect(
&mut self,
trans: &mut impl GenKill<Self::Idx>,
_statement: &mir::Statement<'tcx>,
location: Location,
) {
self.kill_loans_out_of_scope_at_location(trans, location);
}
New `ActiveBorrows` dataflow for two-phase `&mut`; not yet borrowed-checked. High-level picture: The old `Borrows` analysis is now called `Reservations` (implemented as a newtype wrapper around `Borrows`); this continues to compute whether a `Rvalue::Ref` can reach a statement without an intervening `EndRegion`. In addition, we also track what `Place` each such `Rvalue::Ref` was immediately assigned to in a given borrow (yay for MIR-structural properties!). The new `ActiveBorrows` analysis then tracks the initial use of any of those assigned `Places` for a given borrow. I.e. a borrow becomes "active" immediately after it starts being "used" in some way. (This is conservative in the sense that we will treat a copy `x = y;` as a use of `y`; in principle one might further delay activation in such cases.) The new `ActiveBorrows` analysis needs to take the `Reservations` results as an initial input, because the reservation state influences the gen/kill sets for `ActiveBorrows`. In particular, a use of `a` activates a borrow `a = &b` if and only if there exists a path (in the control flow graph) from the borrow to that use. So we need to know if the borrow reaches a given use to know if it really gets a gen-bit or not. * Incorporating the output from one dataflow analysis into the input of another required more changes to the infrastructure than I had expected, and even after those changes, the resulting code is still a bit subtle. * In particular, Since we need to know the intrablock reservation state, we need to dynamically update a bitvector for the reservations as we are also trying to compute the gen/kills bitvector for the active borrows. * The way I ended up deciding to do this (after also toying with at least two other designs) is to put both the reservation state and the active borrow state into a single bitvector. That is why we now have separate (but related) `BorrowIndex` and `ReserveOrActivateIndex`: each borrow index maps to a pair of neighboring reservation and activation indexes. As noted above, these changes are solely adding the active borrows dataflow analysis (and updating the existing code to cope with the switch from `Borrows` to `Reservations`). The code to process the bitvector in the borrow checker currently just skips over all of the active borrow bits. But atop this commit, one *can* observe the analysis results by looking at the graphviz output, e.g. via ```rust #[rustc_mir(borrowck_graphviz_preflow="pre_two_phase.dot", borrowck_graphviz_postflow="post_two_phase.dot")] ``` Includes doc for `FindPlaceUses`, as well as `Reservations` and `ActiveBorrows` structs, which are wrappers are the `Borrows` struct that dictate which flow analysis should be performed.
2017-12-01 12:32:51 +01:00
fn statement_effect(
&mut self,
trans: &mut impl GenKill<Self::Idx>,
stmt: &mir::Statement<'tcx>,
location: Location,
) {
match &stmt.kind {
mir::StatementKind::Assign(box (lhs, rhs)) => {
if let mir::Rvalue::Ref(_, _, place) = rhs {
if place.ignore_borrow(
self.tcx,
self.body,
&self.borrow_set.locals_state_at_exit,
) {
return;
}
2020-08-07 20:47:33 -07:00
let index = self.borrow_set.get_index_of(&location).unwrap_or_else(|| {
panic!("could not find BorrowIndex for location {location:?}");
});
2020-08-07 20:47:33 -07:00
trans.gen(index);
}
// Make sure there are no remaining borrows for variables
// that are assigned over.
self.kill_borrows_on_place(trans, *lhs);
}
mir::StatementKind::StorageDead(local) => {
// Make sure there are no remaining borrows for locals that
// are gone out of scope.
self.kill_borrows_on_place(trans, Place::from(*local));
}
mir::StatementKind::FakeRead(..)
| mir::StatementKind::SetDiscriminant { .. }
2022-04-05 17:14:59 -04:00
| mir::StatementKind::Deinit(..)
| mir::StatementKind::StorageLive(..)
| mir::StatementKind::Retag { .. }
| mir::StatementKind::PlaceMention(..)
| mir::StatementKind::AscribeUserType(..)
| mir::StatementKind::Coverage(..)
| mir::StatementKind::Intrinsic(..)
| mir::StatementKind::ConstEvalCounter
| mir::StatementKind::Nop => {}
}
}
2017-10-30 08:28:07 -04:00
fn before_terminator_effect(
&mut self,
trans: &mut impl GenKill<Self::Idx>,
_terminator: &mir::Terminator<'tcx>,
location: Location,
) {
self.kill_loans_out_of_scope_at_location(trans, location);
}
fn terminator_effect<'mir>(
&mut self,
trans: &mut Self::Domain,
terminator: &'mir mir::Terminator<'tcx>,
2020-02-14 18:17:50 +00:00
_location: Location,
2023-05-27 16:27:04 +00:00
) -> TerminatorEdges<'mir, 'tcx> {
if let mir::TerminatorKind::InlineAsm { operands, .. } = &terminator.kind {
2020-02-14 18:17:50 +00:00
for op in operands {
if let mir::InlineAsmOperand::Out { place: Some(place), .. }
| mir::InlineAsmOperand::InOut { out_place: Some(place), .. } = *op
{
self.kill_borrows_on_place(trans, place);
}
}
}
terminator.edges()
}
fn call_return_effect(
&mut self,
_trans: &mut impl GenKill<Self::Idx>,
_block: mir::BasicBlock,
_return_places: CallReturnPlaces<'_, 'tcx>,
) {
New `ActiveBorrows` dataflow for two-phase `&mut`; not yet borrowed-checked. High-level picture: The old `Borrows` analysis is now called `Reservations` (implemented as a newtype wrapper around `Borrows`); this continues to compute whether a `Rvalue::Ref` can reach a statement without an intervening `EndRegion`. In addition, we also track what `Place` each such `Rvalue::Ref` was immediately assigned to in a given borrow (yay for MIR-structural properties!). The new `ActiveBorrows` analysis then tracks the initial use of any of those assigned `Places` for a given borrow. I.e. a borrow becomes "active" immediately after it starts being "used" in some way. (This is conservative in the sense that we will treat a copy `x = y;` as a use of `y`; in principle one might further delay activation in such cases.) The new `ActiveBorrows` analysis needs to take the `Reservations` results as an initial input, because the reservation state influences the gen/kill sets for `ActiveBorrows`. In particular, a use of `a` activates a borrow `a = &b` if and only if there exists a path (in the control flow graph) from the borrow to that use. So we need to know if the borrow reaches a given use to know if it really gets a gen-bit or not. * Incorporating the output from one dataflow analysis into the input of another required more changes to the infrastructure than I had expected, and even after those changes, the resulting code is still a bit subtle. * In particular, Since we need to know the intrablock reservation state, we need to dynamically update a bitvector for the reservations as we are also trying to compute the gen/kills bitvector for the active borrows. * The way I ended up deciding to do this (after also toying with at least two other designs) is to put both the reservation state and the active borrow state into a single bitvector. That is why we now have separate (but related) `BorrowIndex` and `ReserveOrActivateIndex`: each borrow index maps to a pair of neighboring reservation and activation indexes. As noted above, these changes are solely adding the active borrows dataflow analysis (and updating the existing code to cope with the switch from `Borrows` to `Reservations`). The code to process the bitvector in the borrow checker currently just skips over all of the active borrow bits. But atop this commit, one *can* observe the analysis results by looking at the graphviz output, e.g. via ```rust #[rustc_mir(borrowck_graphviz_preflow="pre_two_phase.dot", borrowck_graphviz_postflow="post_two_phase.dot")] ``` Includes doc for `FindPlaceUses`, as well as `Reservations` and `ActiveBorrows` structs, which are wrappers are the `Borrows` struct that dictate which flow analysis should be performed.
2017-12-01 12:32:51 +01:00
}
}
impl DebugWithContext<Borrows<'_, '_>> for BorrowIndex {
fn fmt_with(&self, ctxt: &Borrows<'_, '_>, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
write!(f, "{:?}", ctxt.location(*self))
}
}