rust/compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/abi.rs

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

318 lines
12 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

use std::fmt;
use rustc_macros::HashStable_Generic;
use rustc_span::symbol::sym;
use rustc_span::{Span, Symbol};
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests;
#[derive(PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord, Hash, Clone, Copy, Debug)]
#[derive(HashStable_Generic, Encodable, Decodable)]
pub enum Abi {
// Some of the ABIs come first because every time we add a new ABI, we have to re-bless all the
// hashing tests. These are used in many places, so giving them stable values reduces test
// churn. The specific values are meaningless.
rustc_target: add "unwind" payloads to `Abi` ### Overview This commit begins the implementation work for RFC 2945. For more information, see the rendered RFC [1] and tracking issue [2]. A boolean `unwind` payload is added to the `C`, `System`, `Stdcall`, and `Thiscall` variants, marking whether unwinding across FFI boundaries is acceptable. The cases where each of these variants' `unwind` member is true correspond with the `C-unwind`, `system-unwind`, `stdcall-unwind`, and `thiscall-unwind` ABI strings introduced in RFC 2945 [3]. ### Feature Gate and Unstable Book This commit adds a `c_unwind` feature gate for the new ABI strings. Tests for this feature gate are included in `src/test/ui/c-unwind/`, which ensure that this feature gate works correctly for each of the new ABIs. A new language features entry in the unstable book is added as well. ### Further Work To Be Done This commit does not proceed to implement the new unwinding ABIs, and is intentionally scoped specifically to *defining* the ABIs and their feature flag. ### One Note on Test Churn This will lead to some test churn, in re-blessing hash tests, as the deleted comment in `src/librustc_target/spec/abi.rs` mentioned, because we can no longer guarantee the ordering of the `Abi` variants. While this is a downside, this decision was made bearing in mind that RFC 2945 states the following, in the "Other `unwind` Strings" section [3]: > More unwind variants of existing ABI strings may be introduced, > with the same semantics, without an additional RFC. Adding a new variant for each of these cases, rather than specifying a payload for a given ABI, would quickly become untenable, and make working with the `Abi` enum prone to mistakes. This approach encodes the unwinding information *into* a given ABI, to account for the future possibility of other `-unwind` ABI strings. ### Ignore Directives `ignore-*` directives are used in two of our `*-unwind` ABI test cases. Specifically, the `stdcall-unwind` and `thiscall-unwind` test cases ignore architectures that do not support `stdcall` and `thiscall`, respectively. These directives are cribbed from `src/test/ui/c-variadic/variadic-ffi-1.rs` for `stdcall`, and `src/test/ui/extern/extern-thiscall.rs` for `thiscall`. This would otherwise fail on some targets, see: https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/commit/fcf697f90206e9c87b39d494f94ab35d976bfc60 ### Footnotes [1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md [2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74990 [3]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md#other-unwind-abi-strings
2020-08-27 11:49:18 -04:00
Rust,
C { unwind: bool },
Cdecl { unwind: bool },
rustc_target: add "unwind" payloads to `Abi` ### Overview This commit begins the implementation work for RFC 2945. For more information, see the rendered RFC [1] and tracking issue [2]. A boolean `unwind` payload is added to the `C`, `System`, `Stdcall`, and `Thiscall` variants, marking whether unwinding across FFI boundaries is acceptable. The cases where each of these variants' `unwind` member is true correspond with the `C-unwind`, `system-unwind`, `stdcall-unwind`, and `thiscall-unwind` ABI strings introduced in RFC 2945 [3]. ### Feature Gate and Unstable Book This commit adds a `c_unwind` feature gate for the new ABI strings. Tests for this feature gate are included in `src/test/ui/c-unwind/`, which ensure that this feature gate works correctly for each of the new ABIs. A new language features entry in the unstable book is added as well. ### Further Work To Be Done This commit does not proceed to implement the new unwinding ABIs, and is intentionally scoped specifically to *defining* the ABIs and their feature flag. ### One Note on Test Churn This will lead to some test churn, in re-blessing hash tests, as the deleted comment in `src/librustc_target/spec/abi.rs` mentioned, because we can no longer guarantee the ordering of the `Abi` variants. While this is a downside, this decision was made bearing in mind that RFC 2945 states the following, in the "Other `unwind` Strings" section [3]: > More unwind variants of existing ABI strings may be introduced, > with the same semantics, without an additional RFC. Adding a new variant for each of these cases, rather than specifying a payload for a given ABI, would quickly become untenable, and make working with the `Abi` enum prone to mistakes. This approach encodes the unwinding information *into* a given ABI, to account for the future possibility of other `-unwind` ABI strings. ### Ignore Directives `ignore-*` directives are used in two of our `*-unwind` ABI test cases. Specifically, the `stdcall-unwind` and `thiscall-unwind` test cases ignore architectures that do not support `stdcall` and `thiscall`, respectively. These directives are cribbed from `src/test/ui/c-variadic/variadic-ffi-1.rs` for `stdcall`, and `src/test/ui/extern/extern-thiscall.rs` for `thiscall`. This would otherwise fail on some targets, see: https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/commit/fcf697f90206e9c87b39d494f94ab35d976bfc60 ### Footnotes [1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md [2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74990 [3]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md#other-unwind-abi-strings
2020-08-27 11:49:18 -04:00
Stdcall { unwind: bool },
Fastcall { unwind: bool },
Vectorcall { unwind: bool },
rustc_target: add "unwind" payloads to `Abi` ### Overview This commit begins the implementation work for RFC 2945. For more information, see the rendered RFC [1] and tracking issue [2]. A boolean `unwind` payload is added to the `C`, `System`, `Stdcall`, and `Thiscall` variants, marking whether unwinding across FFI boundaries is acceptable. The cases where each of these variants' `unwind` member is true correspond with the `C-unwind`, `system-unwind`, `stdcall-unwind`, and `thiscall-unwind` ABI strings introduced in RFC 2945 [3]. ### Feature Gate and Unstable Book This commit adds a `c_unwind` feature gate for the new ABI strings. Tests for this feature gate are included in `src/test/ui/c-unwind/`, which ensure that this feature gate works correctly for each of the new ABIs. A new language features entry in the unstable book is added as well. ### Further Work To Be Done This commit does not proceed to implement the new unwinding ABIs, and is intentionally scoped specifically to *defining* the ABIs and their feature flag. ### One Note on Test Churn This will lead to some test churn, in re-blessing hash tests, as the deleted comment in `src/librustc_target/spec/abi.rs` mentioned, because we can no longer guarantee the ordering of the `Abi` variants. While this is a downside, this decision was made bearing in mind that RFC 2945 states the following, in the "Other `unwind` Strings" section [3]: > More unwind variants of existing ABI strings may be introduced, > with the same semantics, without an additional RFC. Adding a new variant for each of these cases, rather than specifying a payload for a given ABI, would quickly become untenable, and make working with the `Abi` enum prone to mistakes. This approach encodes the unwinding information *into* a given ABI, to account for the future possibility of other `-unwind` ABI strings. ### Ignore Directives `ignore-*` directives are used in two of our `*-unwind` ABI test cases. Specifically, the `stdcall-unwind` and `thiscall-unwind` test cases ignore architectures that do not support `stdcall` and `thiscall`, respectively. These directives are cribbed from `src/test/ui/c-variadic/variadic-ffi-1.rs` for `stdcall`, and `src/test/ui/extern/extern-thiscall.rs` for `thiscall`. This would otherwise fail on some targets, see: https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/commit/fcf697f90206e9c87b39d494f94ab35d976bfc60 ### Footnotes [1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md [2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74990 [3]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md#other-unwind-abi-strings
2020-08-27 11:49:18 -04:00
Thiscall { unwind: bool },
Aapcs { unwind: bool },
Win64 { unwind: bool },
SysV64 { unwind: bool },
PtxKernel,
Msp430Interrupt,
X86Interrupt,
AmdGpuKernel,
EfiApi,
2016-05-06 09:32:10 -04:00
AvrInterrupt,
AvrNonBlockingInterrupt,
CCmseNonSecureCall,
rustc: Add a new `wasm` ABI This commit implements the idea of a new ABI for the WebAssembly target, one called `"wasm"`. This ABI is entirely of my own invention and has no current precedent, but I think that the addition of this ABI might help solve a number of issues with the WebAssembly targets. When `wasm32-unknown-unknown` was first added to Rust I naively "implemented an abi" for the target. I then went to write `wasm-bindgen` which accidentally relied on details of this ABI. Turns out the ABI definition didn't match C, which is causing issues for C/Rust interop. Currently the compiler has a "wasm32 bindgen compat" ABI which is the original implementation I added, and it's purely there for, well, `wasm-bindgen`. Another issue with the WebAssembly target is that it's not clear to me when and if the default C ABI will change to account for WebAssembly's multi-value feature (a feature that allows functions to return multiple values). Even if this does happen, though, it seems like the C ABI will be guided based on the performance of WebAssembly code and will likely not match even what the current wasm-bindgen-compat ABI is today. This leaves a hole in Rust's expressivity in binding WebAssembly where given a particular import type, Rust may not be able to import that signature with an updated C ABI for multi-value. To fix these issues I had the idea of a new ABI for WebAssembly, one called `wasm`. The definition of this ABI is "what you write maps straight to wasm". The goal here is that whatever you write down in the parameter list or in the return values goes straight into the function's signature in the WebAssembly file. This special ABI is for intentionally matching the ABI of an imported function from the environment or exporting a function with the right signature. With the addition of a new ABI, this enables rustc to: * Eventually remove the "wasm-bindgen compat hack". Once this ABI is stable wasm-bindgen can switch to using it everywhere. Afterwards the wasm32-unknown-unknown target can have its default ABI updated to match C. * Expose the ability to precisely match an ABI signature for a WebAssembly function, regardless of what the C ABI that clang chooses turns out to be. * Continue to evolve the definition of the default C ABI to match what clang does on all targets, since the purpose of that ABI will be explicitly matching C rather than generating particular function imports/exports. Naturally this is implemented as an unstable feature initially, but it would be nice for this to get stabilized (if it works) in the near-ish future to remove the wasm32-unknown-unknown incompatibility with the C ABI. Doing this, however, requires the feature to be on stable because wasm-bindgen works with stable Rust.
2021-04-01 16:08:29 -07:00
Wasm,
rustc_target: add "unwind" payloads to `Abi` ### Overview This commit begins the implementation work for RFC 2945. For more information, see the rendered RFC [1] and tracking issue [2]. A boolean `unwind` payload is added to the `C`, `System`, `Stdcall`, and `Thiscall` variants, marking whether unwinding across FFI boundaries is acceptable. The cases where each of these variants' `unwind` member is true correspond with the `C-unwind`, `system-unwind`, `stdcall-unwind`, and `thiscall-unwind` ABI strings introduced in RFC 2945 [3]. ### Feature Gate and Unstable Book This commit adds a `c_unwind` feature gate for the new ABI strings. Tests for this feature gate are included in `src/test/ui/c-unwind/`, which ensure that this feature gate works correctly for each of the new ABIs. A new language features entry in the unstable book is added as well. ### Further Work To Be Done This commit does not proceed to implement the new unwinding ABIs, and is intentionally scoped specifically to *defining* the ABIs and their feature flag. ### One Note on Test Churn This will lead to some test churn, in re-blessing hash tests, as the deleted comment in `src/librustc_target/spec/abi.rs` mentioned, because we can no longer guarantee the ordering of the `Abi` variants. While this is a downside, this decision was made bearing in mind that RFC 2945 states the following, in the "Other `unwind` Strings" section [3]: > More unwind variants of existing ABI strings may be introduced, > with the same semantics, without an additional RFC. Adding a new variant for each of these cases, rather than specifying a payload for a given ABI, would quickly become untenable, and make working with the `Abi` enum prone to mistakes. This approach encodes the unwinding information *into* a given ABI, to account for the future possibility of other `-unwind` ABI strings. ### Ignore Directives `ignore-*` directives are used in two of our `*-unwind` ABI test cases. Specifically, the `stdcall-unwind` and `thiscall-unwind` test cases ignore architectures that do not support `stdcall` and `thiscall`, respectively. These directives are cribbed from `src/test/ui/c-variadic/variadic-ffi-1.rs` for `stdcall`, and `src/test/ui/extern/extern-thiscall.rs` for `thiscall`. This would otherwise fail on some targets, see: https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/commit/fcf697f90206e9c87b39d494f94ab35d976bfc60 ### Footnotes [1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md [2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74990 [3]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md#other-unwind-abi-strings
2020-08-27 11:49:18 -04:00
System { unwind: bool },
RustIntrinsic,
RustCall,
PlatformIntrinsic,
Unadjusted,
RustCold,
feat: `riscv-interrupt-{m,s}` calling conventions Similar to prior support added for the mips430, avr, and x86 targets this change implements the rough equivalent of clang's [`__attribute__((interrupt))`][clang-attr] for riscv targets, enabling e.g. ```rust static mut CNT: usize = 0; pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() { unsafe { CNT += 1; } } ``` to produce highly effective assembly like: ```asm pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() { 420003a0: 1141 addi sp,sp,-16 unsafe { CNT += 1; 420003a2: c62a sw a0,12(sp) 420003a4: c42e sw a1,8(sp) 420003a6: 3fc80537 lui a0,0x3fc80 420003aa: 63c52583 lw a1,1596(a0) # 3fc8063c <_ZN12esp_riscv_rt3CNT17hcec3e3a214887d53E.0> 420003ae: 0585 addi a1,a1,1 420003b0: 62b52e23 sw a1,1596(a0) } } 420003b4: 4532 lw a0,12(sp) 420003b6: 45a2 lw a1,8(sp) 420003b8: 0141 addi sp,sp,16 420003ba: 30200073 mret ``` (disassembly via `riscv64-unknown-elf-objdump -C -S --disassemble ./esp32c3-hal/target/riscv32imc-unknown-none-elf/release/examples/gpio_interrupt`) This outcome is superior to hand-coded interrupt routines which, lacking visibility into any non-assembly body of the interrupt handler, have to be very conservative and save the [entire CPU state to the stack frame][full-frame-save]. By instead asking LLVM to only save the registers that it uses, we defer the decision to the tool with the best context: it can more accurately account for the cost of spills if it knows that every additional register used is already at the cost of an implicit spill. At the LLVM level, this is apparently [implemented by] marking every register as "[callee-save]," matching the semantics of an interrupt handler nicely (it has to leave the CPU state just as it found it after its `{m|s}ret`). This approach is not suitable for every interrupt handler, as it makes no attempt to e.g. save the state in a user-accessible stack frame. For a full discussion of those challenges and tradeoffs, please refer to [the interrupt calling conventions RFC][rfc]. Inside rustc, this implementation differs from prior art because LLVM does not expose the "all-saved" function flavor as a calling convention directly, instead preferring to use an attribute that allows for differentiating between "machine-mode" and "superivsor-mode" interrupts. Finally, some effort has been made to guide those who may not yet be aware of the differences between machine-mode and supervisor-mode interrupts as to why no `riscv-interrupt` calling convention is exposed through rustc, and similarly for why `riscv-interrupt-u` makes no appearance (as it would complicate future LLVM upgrades). [clang-attr]: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#interrupt-risc-v [full-frame-save]: https://github.com/esp-rs/esp-riscv-rt/blob/9281af2ecffe13e40992917316f36920c26acaf3/src/lib.rs#L440-L469 [implemented by]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b7fb2a3fec7c187d58a6d338ab512d9173bca987/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVRegisterInfo.cpp#L61-L67 [callee-save]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/973f1fe7a8591c7af148e573491ab68cc15b6ecf/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVCallingConv.td#L30-L37 [rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3246
2023-05-23 15:08:23 -07:00
RiscvInterruptM,
RiscvInterruptS,
}
impl Abi {
pub fn supports_varargs(self) -> bool {
// * C and Cdecl obviously support varargs.
// * C can be based on SysV64 or Win64, so they must support varargs.
// * EfiApi is based on Win64 or C, so it also supports it.
//
// * Stdcall does not, because it would be impossible for the callee to clean
// up the arguments. (callee doesn't know how many arguments are there)
// * Same for Fastcall, Vectorcall and Thiscall.
// * System can become Stdcall, so is also a no-no.
// * Other calling conventions are related to hardware or the compiler itself.
match self {
Self::C { .. }
| Self::Cdecl { .. }
| Self::Win64 { .. }
| Self::SysV64 { .. }
| Self::EfiApi => true,
_ => false,
}
}
}
2015-03-30 09:38:59 -04:00
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
pub struct AbiData {
abi: Abi,
2016-10-24 11:04:04 +02:00
/// Name of this ABI as we like it called.
name: &'static str,
}
2014-10-27 15:37:07 -07:00
#[allow(non_upper_case_globals)]
2018-08-09 15:42:43 +02:00
const AbiDatas: &[AbiData] = &[
AbiData { abi: Abi::Rust, name: "Rust" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::C { unwind: false }, name: "C" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::C { unwind: true }, name: "C-unwind" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::Cdecl { unwind: false }, name: "cdecl" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::Cdecl { unwind: true }, name: "cdecl-unwind" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::Stdcall { unwind: false }, name: "stdcall" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::Stdcall { unwind: true }, name: "stdcall-unwind" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::Fastcall { unwind: false }, name: "fastcall" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::Fastcall { unwind: true }, name: "fastcall-unwind" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::Vectorcall { unwind: false }, name: "vectorcall" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::Vectorcall { unwind: true }, name: "vectorcall-unwind" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::Thiscall { unwind: false }, name: "thiscall" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::Thiscall { unwind: true }, name: "thiscall-unwind" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::Aapcs { unwind: false }, name: "aapcs" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::Aapcs { unwind: true }, name: "aapcs-unwind" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::Win64 { unwind: false }, name: "win64" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::Win64 { unwind: true }, name: "win64-unwind" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::SysV64 { unwind: false }, name: "sysv64" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::SysV64 { unwind: true }, name: "sysv64-unwind" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::PtxKernel, name: "ptx-kernel" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::Msp430Interrupt, name: "msp430-interrupt" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::X86Interrupt, name: "x86-interrupt" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::AmdGpuKernel, name: "amdgpu-kernel" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::EfiApi, name: "efiapi" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::AvrInterrupt, name: "avr-interrupt" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::AvrNonBlockingInterrupt, name: "avr-non-blocking-interrupt" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::CCmseNonSecureCall, name: "C-cmse-nonsecure-call" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::Wasm, name: "wasm" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::System { unwind: false }, name: "system" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::System { unwind: true }, name: "system-unwind" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::RustIntrinsic, name: "rust-intrinsic" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::RustCall, name: "rust-call" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::PlatformIntrinsic, name: "platform-intrinsic" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::Unadjusted, name: "unadjusted" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::RustCold, name: "rust-cold" },
feat: `riscv-interrupt-{m,s}` calling conventions Similar to prior support added for the mips430, avr, and x86 targets this change implements the rough equivalent of clang's [`__attribute__((interrupt))`][clang-attr] for riscv targets, enabling e.g. ```rust static mut CNT: usize = 0; pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() { unsafe { CNT += 1; } } ``` to produce highly effective assembly like: ```asm pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() { 420003a0: 1141 addi sp,sp,-16 unsafe { CNT += 1; 420003a2: c62a sw a0,12(sp) 420003a4: c42e sw a1,8(sp) 420003a6: 3fc80537 lui a0,0x3fc80 420003aa: 63c52583 lw a1,1596(a0) # 3fc8063c <_ZN12esp_riscv_rt3CNT17hcec3e3a214887d53E.0> 420003ae: 0585 addi a1,a1,1 420003b0: 62b52e23 sw a1,1596(a0) } } 420003b4: 4532 lw a0,12(sp) 420003b6: 45a2 lw a1,8(sp) 420003b8: 0141 addi sp,sp,16 420003ba: 30200073 mret ``` (disassembly via `riscv64-unknown-elf-objdump -C -S --disassemble ./esp32c3-hal/target/riscv32imc-unknown-none-elf/release/examples/gpio_interrupt`) This outcome is superior to hand-coded interrupt routines which, lacking visibility into any non-assembly body of the interrupt handler, have to be very conservative and save the [entire CPU state to the stack frame][full-frame-save]. By instead asking LLVM to only save the registers that it uses, we defer the decision to the tool with the best context: it can more accurately account for the cost of spills if it knows that every additional register used is already at the cost of an implicit spill. At the LLVM level, this is apparently [implemented by] marking every register as "[callee-save]," matching the semantics of an interrupt handler nicely (it has to leave the CPU state just as it found it after its `{m|s}ret`). This approach is not suitable for every interrupt handler, as it makes no attempt to e.g. save the state in a user-accessible stack frame. For a full discussion of those challenges and tradeoffs, please refer to [the interrupt calling conventions RFC][rfc]. Inside rustc, this implementation differs from prior art because LLVM does not expose the "all-saved" function flavor as a calling convention directly, instead preferring to use an attribute that allows for differentiating between "machine-mode" and "superivsor-mode" interrupts. Finally, some effort has been made to guide those who may not yet be aware of the differences between machine-mode and supervisor-mode interrupts as to why no `riscv-interrupt` calling convention is exposed through rustc, and similarly for why `riscv-interrupt-u` makes no appearance (as it would complicate future LLVM upgrades). [clang-attr]: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#interrupt-risc-v [full-frame-save]: https://github.com/esp-rs/esp-riscv-rt/blob/9281af2ecffe13e40992917316f36920c26acaf3/src/lib.rs#L440-L469 [implemented by]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b7fb2a3fec7c187d58a6d338ab512d9173bca987/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVRegisterInfo.cpp#L61-L67 [callee-save]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/973f1fe7a8591c7af148e573491ab68cc15b6ecf/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVCallingConv.td#L30-L37 [rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3246
2023-05-23 15:08:23 -07:00
AbiData { abi: Abi::RiscvInterruptM, name: "riscv-interrupt-m" },
AbiData { abi: Abi::RiscvInterruptS, name: "riscv-interrupt-s" },
];
feat: `riscv-interrupt-{m,s}` calling conventions Similar to prior support added for the mips430, avr, and x86 targets this change implements the rough equivalent of clang's [`__attribute__((interrupt))`][clang-attr] for riscv targets, enabling e.g. ```rust static mut CNT: usize = 0; pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() { unsafe { CNT += 1; } } ``` to produce highly effective assembly like: ```asm pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() { 420003a0: 1141 addi sp,sp,-16 unsafe { CNT += 1; 420003a2: c62a sw a0,12(sp) 420003a4: c42e sw a1,8(sp) 420003a6: 3fc80537 lui a0,0x3fc80 420003aa: 63c52583 lw a1,1596(a0) # 3fc8063c <_ZN12esp_riscv_rt3CNT17hcec3e3a214887d53E.0> 420003ae: 0585 addi a1,a1,1 420003b0: 62b52e23 sw a1,1596(a0) } } 420003b4: 4532 lw a0,12(sp) 420003b6: 45a2 lw a1,8(sp) 420003b8: 0141 addi sp,sp,16 420003ba: 30200073 mret ``` (disassembly via `riscv64-unknown-elf-objdump -C -S --disassemble ./esp32c3-hal/target/riscv32imc-unknown-none-elf/release/examples/gpio_interrupt`) This outcome is superior to hand-coded interrupt routines which, lacking visibility into any non-assembly body of the interrupt handler, have to be very conservative and save the [entire CPU state to the stack frame][full-frame-save]. By instead asking LLVM to only save the registers that it uses, we defer the decision to the tool with the best context: it can more accurately account for the cost of spills if it knows that every additional register used is already at the cost of an implicit spill. At the LLVM level, this is apparently [implemented by] marking every register as "[callee-save]," matching the semantics of an interrupt handler nicely (it has to leave the CPU state just as it found it after its `{m|s}ret`). This approach is not suitable for every interrupt handler, as it makes no attempt to e.g. save the state in a user-accessible stack frame. For a full discussion of those challenges and tradeoffs, please refer to [the interrupt calling conventions RFC][rfc]. Inside rustc, this implementation differs from prior art because LLVM does not expose the "all-saved" function flavor as a calling convention directly, instead preferring to use an attribute that allows for differentiating between "machine-mode" and "superivsor-mode" interrupts. Finally, some effort has been made to guide those who may not yet be aware of the differences between machine-mode and supervisor-mode interrupts as to why no `riscv-interrupt` calling convention is exposed through rustc, and similarly for why `riscv-interrupt-u` makes no appearance (as it would complicate future LLVM upgrades). [clang-attr]: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#interrupt-risc-v [full-frame-save]: https://github.com/esp-rs/esp-riscv-rt/blob/9281af2ecffe13e40992917316f36920c26acaf3/src/lib.rs#L440-L469 [implemented by]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b7fb2a3fec7c187d58a6d338ab512d9173bca987/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVRegisterInfo.cpp#L61-L67 [callee-save]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/973f1fe7a8591c7af148e573491ab68cc15b6ecf/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVCallingConv.td#L30-L37 [rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3246
2023-05-23 15:08:23 -07:00
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)]
pub enum AbiUnsupported {
Unrecognized,
Reason { explain: &'static str },
}
2014-06-09 13:12:30 -07:00
/// Returns the ABI with the given name (if any).
feat: `riscv-interrupt-{m,s}` calling conventions Similar to prior support added for the mips430, avr, and x86 targets this change implements the rough equivalent of clang's [`__attribute__((interrupt))`][clang-attr] for riscv targets, enabling e.g. ```rust static mut CNT: usize = 0; pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() { unsafe { CNT += 1; } } ``` to produce highly effective assembly like: ```asm pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() { 420003a0: 1141 addi sp,sp,-16 unsafe { CNT += 1; 420003a2: c62a sw a0,12(sp) 420003a4: c42e sw a1,8(sp) 420003a6: 3fc80537 lui a0,0x3fc80 420003aa: 63c52583 lw a1,1596(a0) # 3fc8063c <_ZN12esp_riscv_rt3CNT17hcec3e3a214887d53E.0> 420003ae: 0585 addi a1,a1,1 420003b0: 62b52e23 sw a1,1596(a0) } } 420003b4: 4532 lw a0,12(sp) 420003b6: 45a2 lw a1,8(sp) 420003b8: 0141 addi sp,sp,16 420003ba: 30200073 mret ``` (disassembly via `riscv64-unknown-elf-objdump -C -S --disassemble ./esp32c3-hal/target/riscv32imc-unknown-none-elf/release/examples/gpio_interrupt`) This outcome is superior to hand-coded interrupt routines which, lacking visibility into any non-assembly body of the interrupt handler, have to be very conservative and save the [entire CPU state to the stack frame][full-frame-save]. By instead asking LLVM to only save the registers that it uses, we defer the decision to the tool with the best context: it can more accurately account for the cost of spills if it knows that every additional register used is already at the cost of an implicit spill. At the LLVM level, this is apparently [implemented by] marking every register as "[callee-save]," matching the semantics of an interrupt handler nicely (it has to leave the CPU state just as it found it after its `{m|s}ret`). This approach is not suitable for every interrupt handler, as it makes no attempt to e.g. save the state in a user-accessible stack frame. For a full discussion of those challenges and tradeoffs, please refer to [the interrupt calling conventions RFC][rfc]. Inside rustc, this implementation differs from prior art because LLVM does not expose the "all-saved" function flavor as a calling convention directly, instead preferring to use an attribute that allows for differentiating between "machine-mode" and "superivsor-mode" interrupts. Finally, some effort has been made to guide those who may not yet be aware of the differences between machine-mode and supervisor-mode interrupts as to why no `riscv-interrupt` calling convention is exposed through rustc, and similarly for why `riscv-interrupt-u` makes no appearance (as it would complicate future LLVM upgrades). [clang-attr]: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#interrupt-risc-v [full-frame-save]: https://github.com/esp-rs/esp-riscv-rt/blob/9281af2ecffe13e40992917316f36920c26acaf3/src/lib.rs#L440-L469 [implemented by]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b7fb2a3fec7c187d58a6d338ab512d9173bca987/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVRegisterInfo.cpp#L61-L67 [callee-save]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/973f1fe7a8591c7af148e573491ab68cc15b6ecf/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVCallingConv.td#L30-L37 [rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3246
2023-05-23 15:08:23 -07:00
pub fn lookup(name: &str) -> Result<Abi, AbiUnsupported> {
AbiDatas.iter().find(|abi_data| name == abi_data.name).map(|&x| x.abi).ok_or_else(|| match name {
"riscv-interrupt" => AbiUnsupported::Reason {
explain: "please use one of riscv-interrupt-m or riscv-interrupt-s for machine- or supervisor-level interrupts, respectively",
},
"riscv-interrupt-u" => AbiUnsupported::Reason {
explain: "user-mode interrupt handlers have been removed from LLVM pending standardization, see: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149314",
},
_ => AbiUnsupported::Unrecognized,
})
}
pub fn all_names() -> Vec<&'static str> {
AbiDatas.iter().map(|d| d.name).collect()
}
pub fn enabled_names(features: &rustc_feature::Features, span: Span) -> Vec<&'static str> {
AbiDatas
.iter()
.map(|d| d.name)
.filter(|name| is_enabled(features, span, name).is_ok())
.collect()
}
pub enum AbiDisabled {
Unstable { feature: Symbol, explain: &'static str },
Unrecognized,
}
pub fn is_enabled(
features: &rustc_feature::Features,
span: Span,
name: &str,
) -> Result<(), AbiDisabled> {
let s = is_stable(name);
if let Err(AbiDisabled::Unstable { feature, .. }) = s {
if features.enabled(feature) || span.allows_unstable(feature) {
return Ok(());
}
}
s
}
pub fn is_stable(name: &str) -> Result<(), AbiDisabled> {
match name {
// Stable
2023-04-03 08:17:48 +01:00
"Rust" | "C" | "C-unwind" | "cdecl" | "cdecl-unwind" | "stdcall" | "stdcall-unwind"
| "fastcall" | "fastcall-unwind" | "aapcs" | "aapcs-unwind" | "win64" | "win64-unwind"
2023-08-06 23:20:53 +02:00
| "sysv64" | "sysv64-unwind" | "system" | "system-unwind" | "efiapi" | "thiscall"
| "thiscall-unwind" => Ok(()),
"rust-intrinsic" => Err(AbiDisabled::Unstable {
feature: sym::intrinsics,
explain: "intrinsics are subject to change",
}),
"platform-intrinsic" => Err(AbiDisabled::Unstable {
feature: sym::platform_intrinsics,
explain: "platform intrinsics are experimental and possibly buggy",
}),
"vectorcall" => Err(AbiDisabled::Unstable {
feature: sym::abi_vectorcall,
explain: "vectorcall is experimental and subject to change",
}),
2023-04-03 08:17:48 +01:00
"vectorcall-unwind" => Err(AbiDisabled::Unstable {
feature: sym::abi_vectorcall,
explain: "vectorcall-unwind ABI is experimental and subject to change",
}),
"rust-call" => Err(AbiDisabled::Unstable {
feature: sym::unboxed_closures,
explain: "rust-call ABI is subject to change",
}),
"rust-cold" => Err(AbiDisabled::Unstable {
feature: sym::rust_cold_cc,
explain: "rust-cold is experimental and subject to change",
}),
"ptx-kernel" => Err(AbiDisabled::Unstable {
feature: sym::abi_ptx,
explain: "PTX ABIs are experimental and subject to change",
}),
"unadjusted" => Err(AbiDisabled::Unstable {
feature: sym::abi_unadjusted,
explain: "unadjusted ABI is an implementation detail and perma-unstable",
}),
"msp430-interrupt" => Err(AbiDisabled::Unstable {
feature: sym::abi_msp430_interrupt,
explain: "msp430-interrupt ABI is experimental and subject to change",
}),
"x86-interrupt" => Err(AbiDisabled::Unstable {
feature: sym::abi_x86_interrupt,
explain: "x86-interrupt ABI is experimental and subject to change",
}),
"amdgpu-kernel" => Err(AbiDisabled::Unstable {
feature: sym::abi_amdgpu_kernel,
explain: "amdgpu-kernel ABI is experimental and subject to change",
}),
"avr-interrupt" | "avr-non-blocking-interrupt" => Err(AbiDisabled::Unstable {
feature: sym::abi_avr_interrupt,
explain: "avr-interrupt and avr-non-blocking-interrupt ABIs are experimental and subject to change",
}),
feat: `riscv-interrupt-{m,s}` calling conventions Similar to prior support added for the mips430, avr, and x86 targets this change implements the rough equivalent of clang's [`__attribute__((interrupt))`][clang-attr] for riscv targets, enabling e.g. ```rust static mut CNT: usize = 0; pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() { unsafe { CNT += 1; } } ``` to produce highly effective assembly like: ```asm pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() { 420003a0: 1141 addi sp,sp,-16 unsafe { CNT += 1; 420003a2: c62a sw a0,12(sp) 420003a4: c42e sw a1,8(sp) 420003a6: 3fc80537 lui a0,0x3fc80 420003aa: 63c52583 lw a1,1596(a0) # 3fc8063c <_ZN12esp_riscv_rt3CNT17hcec3e3a214887d53E.0> 420003ae: 0585 addi a1,a1,1 420003b0: 62b52e23 sw a1,1596(a0) } } 420003b4: 4532 lw a0,12(sp) 420003b6: 45a2 lw a1,8(sp) 420003b8: 0141 addi sp,sp,16 420003ba: 30200073 mret ``` (disassembly via `riscv64-unknown-elf-objdump -C -S --disassemble ./esp32c3-hal/target/riscv32imc-unknown-none-elf/release/examples/gpio_interrupt`) This outcome is superior to hand-coded interrupt routines which, lacking visibility into any non-assembly body of the interrupt handler, have to be very conservative and save the [entire CPU state to the stack frame][full-frame-save]. By instead asking LLVM to only save the registers that it uses, we defer the decision to the tool with the best context: it can more accurately account for the cost of spills if it knows that every additional register used is already at the cost of an implicit spill. At the LLVM level, this is apparently [implemented by] marking every register as "[callee-save]," matching the semantics of an interrupt handler nicely (it has to leave the CPU state just as it found it after its `{m|s}ret`). This approach is not suitable for every interrupt handler, as it makes no attempt to e.g. save the state in a user-accessible stack frame. For a full discussion of those challenges and tradeoffs, please refer to [the interrupt calling conventions RFC][rfc]. Inside rustc, this implementation differs from prior art because LLVM does not expose the "all-saved" function flavor as a calling convention directly, instead preferring to use an attribute that allows for differentiating between "machine-mode" and "superivsor-mode" interrupts. Finally, some effort has been made to guide those who may not yet be aware of the differences between machine-mode and supervisor-mode interrupts as to why no `riscv-interrupt` calling convention is exposed through rustc, and similarly for why `riscv-interrupt-u` makes no appearance (as it would complicate future LLVM upgrades). [clang-attr]: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#interrupt-risc-v [full-frame-save]: https://github.com/esp-rs/esp-riscv-rt/blob/9281af2ecffe13e40992917316f36920c26acaf3/src/lib.rs#L440-L469 [implemented by]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b7fb2a3fec7c187d58a6d338ab512d9173bca987/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVRegisterInfo.cpp#L61-L67 [callee-save]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/973f1fe7a8591c7af148e573491ab68cc15b6ecf/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVCallingConv.td#L30-L37 [rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3246
2023-05-23 15:08:23 -07:00
"riscv-interrupt-m" | "riscv-interrupt-s" => Err(AbiDisabled::Unstable {
feature: sym::abi_riscv_interrupt,
explain: "riscv-interrupt ABIs are experimental and subject to change",
}),
"C-cmse-nonsecure-call" => Err(AbiDisabled::Unstable {
feature: sym::abi_c_cmse_nonsecure_call,
explain: "C-cmse-nonsecure-call ABI is experimental and subject to change",
}),
"wasm" => Err(AbiDisabled::Unstable {
feature: sym::wasm_abi,
explain: "wasm ABI is experimental and subject to change",
}),
_ => Err(AbiDisabled::Unrecognized),
}
}
impl Abi {
2021-07-08 21:58:05 +02:00
/// Default ABI chosen for `extern fn` declarations without an explicit ABI.
pub const FALLBACK: Abi = Abi::C { unwind: false };
#[inline]
2018-08-09 15:42:43 +02:00
pub fn index(self) -> usize {
rustc_target: add "unwind" payloads to `Abi` ### Overview This commit begins the implementation work for RFC 2945. For more information, see the rendered RFC [1] and tracking issue [2]. A boolean `unwind` payload is added to the `C`, `System`, `Stdcall`, and `Thiscall` variants, marking whether unwinding across FFI boundaries is acceptable. The cases where each of these variants' `unwind` member is true correspond with the `C-unwind`, `system-unwind`, `stdcall-unwind`, and `thiscall-unwind` ABI strings introduced in RFC 2945 [3]. ### Feature Gate and Unstable Book This commit adds a `c_unwind` feature gate for the new ABI strings. Tests for this feature gate are included in `src/test/ui/c-unwind/`, which ensure that this feature gate works correctly for each of the new ABIs. A new language features entry in the unstable book is added as well. ### Further Work To Be Done This commit does not proceed to implement the new unwinding ABIs, and is intentionally scoped specifically to *defining* the ABIs and their feature flag. ### One Note on Test Churn This will lead to some test churn, in re-blessing hash tests, as the deleted comment in `src/librustc_target/spec/abi.rs` mentioned, because we can no longer guarantee the ordering of the `Abi` variants. While this is a downside, this decision was made bearing in mind that RFC 2945 states the following, in the "Other `unwind` Strings" section [3]: > More unwind variants of existing ABI strings may be introduced, > with the same semantics, without an additional RFC. Adding a new variant for each of these cases, rather than specifying a payload for a given ABI, would quickly become untenable, and make working with the `Abi` enum prone to mistakes. This approach encodes the unwinding information *into* a given ABI, to account for the future possibility of other `-unwind` ABI strings. ### Ignore Directives `ignore-*` directives are used in two of our `*-unwind` ABI test cases. Specifically, the `stdcall-unwind` and `thiscall-unwind` test cases ignore architectures that do not support `stdcall` and `thiscall`, respectively. These directives are cribbed from `src/test/ui/c-variadic/variadic-ffi-1.rs` for `stdcall`, and `src/test/ui/extern/extern-thiscall.rs` for `thiscall`. This would otherwise fail on some targets, see: https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/commit/fcf697f90206e9c87b39d494f94ab35d976bfc60 ### Footnotes [1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md [2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74990 [3]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md#other-unwind-abi-strings
2020-08-27 11:49:18 -04:00
// N.B., this ordering MUST match the AbiDatas array above.
// (This is ensured by the test indices_are_correct().)
use Abi::*;
let i = match self {
rustc_target: add "unwind" payloads to `Abi` ### Overview This commit begins the implementation work for RFC 2945. For more information, see the rendered RFC [1] and tracking issue [2]. A boolean `unwind` payload is added to the `C`, `System`, `Stdcall`, and `Thiscall` variants, marking whether unwinding across FFI boundaries is acceptable. The cases where each of these variants' `unwind` member is true correspond with the `C-unwind`, `system-unwind`, `stdcall-unwind`, and `thiscall-unwind` ABI strings introduced in RFC 2945 [3]. ### Feature Gate and Unstable Book This commit adds a `c_unwind` feature gate for the new ABI strings. Tests for this feature gate are included in `src/test/ui/c-unwind/`, which ensure that this feature gate works correctly for each of the new ABIs. A new language features entry in the unstable book is added as well. ### Further Work To Be Done This commit does not proceed to implement the new unwinding ABIs, and is intentionally scoped specifically to *defining* the ABIs and their feature flag. ### One Note on Test Churn This will lead to some test churn, in re-blessing hash tests, as the deleted comment in `src/librustc_target/spec/abi.rs` mentioned, because we can no longer guarantee the ordering of the `Abi` variants. While this is a downside, this decision was made bearing in mind that RFC 2945 states the following, in the "Other `unwind` Strings" section [3]: > More unwind variants of existing ABI strings may be introduced, > with the same semantics, without an additional RFC. Adding a new variant for each of these cases, rather than specifying a payload for a given ABI, would quickly become untenable, and make working with the `Abi` enum prone to mistakes. This approach encodes the unwinding information *into* a given ABI, to account for the future possibility of other `-unwind` ABI strings. ### Ignore Directives `ignore-*` directives are used in two of our `*-unwind` ABI test cases. Specifically, the `stdcall-unwind` and `thiscall-unwind` test cases ignore architectures that do not support `stdcall` and `thiscall`, respectively. These directives are cribbed from `src/test/ui/c-variadic/variadic-ffi-1.rs` for `stdcall`, and `src/test/ui/extern/extern-thiscall.rs` for `thiscall`. This would otherwise fail on some targets, see: https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/commit/fcf697f90206e9c87b39d494f94ab35d976bfc60 ### Footnotes [1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md [2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74990 [3]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md#other-unwind-abi-strings
2020-08-27 11:49:18 -04:00
// Cross-platform ABIs
Rust => 0,
C { unwind: false } => 1,
C { unwind: true } => 2,
// Platform-specific ABIs
Cdecl { unwind: false } => 3,
Cdecl { unwind: true } => 4,
Stdcall { unwind: false } => 5,
Stdcall { unwind: true } => 6,
Fastcall { unwind: false } => 7,
Fastcall { unwind: true } => 8,
Vectorcall { unwind: false } => 9,
Vectorcall { unwind: true } => 10,
Thiscall { unwind: false } => 11,
Thiscall { unwind: true } => 12,
Aapcs { unwind: false } => 13,
Aapcs { unwind: true } => 14,
Win64 { unwind: false } => 15,
Win64 { unwind: true } => 16,
SysV64 { unwind: false } => 17,
SysV64 { unwind: true } => 18,
PtxKernel => 19,
Msp430Interrupt => 20,
X86Interrupt => 21,
AmdGpuKernel => 22,
EfiApi => 23,
AvrInterrupt => 24,
AvrNonBlockingInterrupt => 25,
CCmseNonSecureCall => 26,
Wasm => 27,
rustc_target: add "unwind" payloads to `Abi` ### Overview This commit begins the implementation work for RFC 2945. For more information, see the rendered RFC [1] and tracking issue [2]. A boolean `unwind` payload is added to the `C`, `System`, `Stdcall`, and `Thiscall` variants, marking whether unwinding across FFI boundaries is acceptable. The cases where each of these variants' `unwind` member is true correspond with the `C-unwind`, `system-unwind`, `stdcall-unwind`, and `thiscall-unwind` ABI strings introduced in RFC 2945 [3]. ### Feature Gate and Unstable Book This commit adds a `c_unwind` feature gate for the new ABI strings. Tests for this feature gate are included in `src/test/ui/c-unwind/`, which ensure that this feature gate works correctly for each of the new ABIs. A new language features entry in the unstable book is added as well. ### Further Work To Be Done This commit does not proceed to implement the new unwinding ABIs, and is intentionally scoped specifically to *defining* the ABIs and their feature flag. ### One Note on Test Churn This will lead to some test churn, in re-blessing hash tests, as the deleted comment in `src/librustc_target/spec/abi.rs` mentioned, because we can no longer guarantee the ordering of the `Abi` variants. While this is a downside, this decision was made bearing in mind that RFC 2945 states the following, in the "Other `unwind` Strings" section [3]: > More unwind variants of existing ABI strings may be introduced, > with the same semantics, without an additional RFC. Adding a new variant for each of these cases, rather than specifying a payload for a given ABI, would quickly become untenable, and make working with the `Abi` enum prone to mistakes. This approach encodes the unwinding information *into* a given ABI, to account for the future possibility of other `-unwind` ABI strings. ### Ignore Directives `ignore-*` directives are used in two of our `*-unwind` ABI test cases. Specifically, the `stdcall-unwind` and `thiscall-unwind` test cases ignore architectures that do not support `stdcall` and `thiscall`, respectively. These directives are cribbed from `src/test/ui/c-variadic/variadic-ffi-1.rs` for `stdcall`, and `src/test/ui/extern/extern-thiscall.rs` for `thiscall`. This would otherwise fail on some targets, see: https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/commit/fcf697f90206e9c87b39d494f94ab35d976bfc60 ### Footnotes [1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md [2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74990 [3]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md#other-unwind-abi-strings
2020-08-27 11:49:18 -04:00
// Cross-platform ABIs
System { unwind: false } => 28,
System { unwind: true } => 29,
RustIntrinsic => 30,
RustCall => 31,
PlatformIntrinsic => 32,
Unadjusted => 33,
RustCold => 34,
feat: `riscv-interrupt-{m,s}` calling conventions Similar to prior support added for the mips430, avr, and x86 targets this change implements the rough equivalent of clang's [`__attribute__((interrupt))`][clang-attr] for riscv targets, enabling e.g. ```rust static mut CNT: usize = 0; pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() { unsafe { CNT += 1; } } ``` to produce highly effective assembly like: ```asm pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() { 420003a0: 1141 addi sp,sp,-16 unsafe { CNT += 1; 420003a2: c62a sw a0,12(sp) 420003a4: c42e sw a1,8(sp) 420003a6: 3fc80537 lui a0,0x3fc80 420003aa: 63c52583 lw a1,1596(a0) # 3fc8063c <_ZN12esp_riscv_rt3CNT17hcec3e3a214887d53E.0> 420003ae: 0585 addi a1,a1,1 420003b0: 62b52e23 sw a1,1596(a0) } } 420003b4: 4532 lw a0,12(sp) 420003b6: 45a2 lw a1,8(sp) 420003b8: 0141 addi sp,sp,16 420003ba: 30200073 mret ``` (disassembly via `riscv64-unknown-elf-objdump -C -S --disassemble ./esp32c3-hal/target/riscv32imc-unknown-none-elf/release/examples/gpio_interrupt`) This outcome is superior to hand-coded interrupt routines which, lacking visibility into any non-assembly body of the interrupt handler, have to be very conservative and save the [entire CPU state to the stack frame][full-frame-save]. By instead asking LLVM to only save the registers that it uses, we defer the decision to the tool with the best context: it can more accurately account for the cost of spills if it knows that every additional register used is already at the cost of an implicit spill. At the LLVM level, this is apparently [implemented by] marking every register as "[callee-save]," matching the semantics of an interrupt handler nicely (it has to leave the CPU state just as it found it after its `{m|s}ret`). This approach is not suitable for every interrupt handler, as it makes no attempt to e.g. save the state in a user-accessible stack frame. For a full discussion of those challenges and tradeoffs, please refer to [the interrupt calling conventions RFC][rfc]. Inside rustc, this implementation differs from prior art because LLVM does not expose the "all-saved" function flavor as a calling convention directly, instead preferring to use an attribute that allows for differentiating between "machine-mode" and "superivsor-mode" interrupts. Finally, some effort has been made to guide those who may not yet be aware of the differences between machine-mode and supervisor-mode interrupts as to why no `riscv-interrupt` calling convention is exposed through rustc, and similarly for why `riscv-interrupt-u` makes no appearance (as it would complicate future LLVM upgrades). [clang-attr]: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#interrupt-risc-v [full-frame-save]: https://github.com/esp-rs/esp-riscv-rt/blob/9281af2ecffe13e40992917316f36920c26acaf3/src/lib.rs#L440-L469 [implemented by]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b7fb2a3fec7c187d58a6d338ab512d9173bca987/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVRegisterInfo.cpp#L61-L67 [callee-save]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/973f1fe7a8591c7af148e573491ab68cc15b6ecf/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVCallingConv.td#L30-L37 [rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3246
2023-05-23 15:08:23 -07:00
RiscvInterruptM => 35,
RiscvInterruptS => 36,
};
debug_assert!(
AbiDatas
.iter()
.enumerate()
.find(|(_, AbiData { abi, .. })| *abi == self)
.map(|(index, _)| index)
.expect("abi variant has associated data")
== i,
"Abi index did not match `AbiDatas` ordering"
);
i
}
#[inline]
2018-08-09 15:42:43 +02:00
pub fn data(self) -> &'static AbiData {
&AbiDatas[self.index()]
}
2018-08-09 15:42:43 +02:00
pub fn name(self) -> &'static str {
self.data().name
}
}
std: Rename Show/String to Debug/Display This commit is an implementation of [RFC 565][rfc] which is a stabilization of the `std::fmt` module and the implementations of various formatting traits. Specifically, the following changes were performed: [rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0565-show-string-guidelines.md * The `Show` trait is now deprecated, it was renamed to `Debug` * The `String` trait is now deprecated, it was renamed to `Display` * Many `Debug` and `Display` implementations were audited in accordance with the RFC and audited implementations now have the `#[stable]` attribute * Integers and floats no longer print a suffix * Smart pointers no longer print details that they are a smart pointer * Paths with `Debug` are now quoted and escape characters * The `unwrap` methods on `Result` now require `Display` instead of `Debug` * The `Error` trait no longer has a `detail` method and now requires that `Display` must be implemented. With the loss of `String`, this has moved into libcore. * `impl<E: Error> FromError<E> for Box<Error>` now exists * `derive(Show)` has been renamed to `derive(Debug)`. This is not currently warned about due to warnings being emitted on stage1+ While backwards compatibility is attempted to be maintained with a blanket implementation of `Display` for the old `String` trait (and the same for `Show`/`Debug`) this is still a breaking change due to primitives no longer implementing `String` as well as modifications such as `unwrap` and the `Error` trait. Most code is fairly straightforward to update with a rename or tweaks of method calls. [breaking-change] Closes #21436
2015-01-20 15:45:07 -08:00
impl fmt::Display for Abi {
2019-02-08 21:00:07 +09:00
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
2023-04-09 23:08:39 +02:00
write!(f, "\"{}\"", self.name())
}
}